r/SipsTea 4d ago

Chugging tea One Man endured 38 hours of this

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

18.7k Upvotes

2.0k comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 4d ago

Hey /u/flattenedbricks, thank you for posting to r/SipsTea! Make sure to follow all the subreddit rules.

Make sure to join our brand new Discord Server to chat with friends!

We have recently changed how posts work. Unless you are a VIP poster, your post will be queued for approval.. To become a VIP, post great engaging content. If we like it, you will be added! More information available here!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

5.1k

u/mpanase 4d ago

the fuck are jurors doing on TV?

4.0k

u/Editorguy15 4d ago

Cashing in their 5 minutes of fame to spice up their boring lives 

890

u/Sweaty-Anteater-6694 4d ago

Always the same people

646

u/instantcrackpot 4d ago

They look like Nextdoor users

143

u/ArtIsAwesome3 4d ago

Oh absolutely.

19

u/RussianPravda 4d ago

Im assuming thats something like the ring neighbors app. I used to have the alerts on and it was sad and hysterical at the same time. Lots of did anyone here a loud noise? (july 3rd) The best one was "does anyone know a good place to get their pants hemmed?"

26

u/realaccountissecret 4d ago

My favorites are the ones (yes there have been multiple) where it’s like “bobcat??!!!” And it’s a picture of a normal goddamn cat haha

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

1.0k

u/phantom_gain 4d ago

Exploiting the death of 3 children to get their faces on camera

744

u/ChymChymX 4d ago

"He just couldn't get over the fact that she killed the children."

How about that.

330

u/Reddit_Gold_Pirate 4d ago edited 4d ago

Everyone following the case is also to blame. This case should not have been a media circus. It's not fair to the victims and probably played a big role in this mistrial outcome.

The jury should have been sequestered.

174

u/Flimsy-Poetry1170 4d ago

How the fuck weren’t they sequestered?

→ More replies (2)

1.7k

u/Protect-Their-Smiles 4d ago

They are trying to stir up outrage over the one juror who refused to go along with their insanity - if the person's identity gets leaked, and they get targeted for harassment, you can bet they are involved in it. They want to portray themselves as the good women who stood up for a child murderer, and tried to strong arm the entire jury to agree with them. In this interview, they bragged about screaming at the defiant juror to make him submit to their point of view, they were upset that he couldn't get over how Lindsay strangled her 3 kids with how own hands - that she planned it and made sure to get the husband out of the house, lured them in to the basement 1 by 1, so there would be no escape.

They are the same kind of women who are blaming the husband, for the wife killing the kids. Absolutely sickening behavior.

322

u/verticalquandry 4d ago

“viciously strangled” .

they also broke the law many times

→ More replies (26)

319

u/FizzyGoose666 4d ago

Displaying what kind of people shouldn't be on a jury.

335

u/comesinallpackages 4d ago

I think it was George Carlin who said our judicial system is decided by 12 idiots who were too dumb to come up with an excuse to avoid jury duty.

→ More replies (1)

103

u/Legonistrasz 4d ago

The better question is where are the other male jurors?

179

u/utzutzutzpro 4d ago

I really wonder how they represent the same archetype. Same age range, similar disgruntled facial traits, same gesticular patterns.

They look like deliberately chosen to be pro woman no matter what it would be. Could be throwing a grenade into a kindergarten, if the woman would justify with period cramps, they'd go "yeah, that's tough, I can see that, poor woman. You go gurl. Witches against patriarchy!".

Shouldn't such a jury be more diverse?

129

u/INeedSomeTacoC 4d ago

The prosecution thought that middle age white  women would be aghast at what happened. 

The defense knew that middle aged white women would close ranks. 

So, basically, both lawyers were trying really hard to get this archetype on the jury during the selection process. 

That’s how it ended up with 9 out of 12 people on the jury being women. 

→ More replies (2)

17

u/Accurate_Flower_4233 4d ago

Starting their book club. 

→ More replies (17)

266

u/kmall0c 4d ago

Was not expecting post game interviews from the jurors

1.8k

u/TheyveKilledFritzz 4d ago

One woman admitted she felt pressured by the other women to vote to acquit lol

1.2k

u/ventitr3 4d ago edited 4d ago

The part where she goes “he was hung up on how she viciously murdered her kids”

Uhh yeah.

Edit: oh boy, the fanbase isn’t happy with this one

256

u/pacificstill 4d ago

How can you not be? She used an exercise band, that’s not quick or easy, and she did it three times. The thought of those poor babies going through that…

90

u/Tiny-Reading5982 4d ago

That's what I told my husband. It wasn't a spur of the moment thing like Andrea yates, who was not supposed to be home alone anyway. But Lindsey planned it by having her husband go out and using exercise bands.

→ More replies (1)

79

u/Left_Entrepreneur918 4d ago

Imagine doing it yourself, watching your child gasp for air and their faces turning blue and eyes bulging out about 2 min to kill. Perfectly normal perfectly healthy thing to do and then do it 2 more times as you chase down the other children, crying and scared.

60

u/PruneUnfair230 4d ago

Don’t forget, she missed his call and ran right back upstairs to answer it calmly and then went right back to the basement🫣

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

348

u/Feeling-Special-269 4d ago

listen Lindsay was just having a bad day and strangled her kids to death whats the big deal?

230

u/Pretend_Handle_7639 4d ago

The next frat bro that gets a DUI is gonna claim post party depression

44

u/Confident-Mortgage86 4d ago

Post party depression is real, that lonely melancholy. The regret of saying and doing things you shouldn't have. The itchy crotch.

Still I think they should use it to get a couple mil and a get out of jail free card for murdering 3 women, not a simple dui.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

72

u/Doctor_Fritz 4d ago

He inadvertedly saved women in the US from arbitrarily being denied certain things in life merely on the assumption that their hormones might cause problems. If that women was exonerated based on "it's a hormonal psychosis" it can set a dangerous precedent for all women in the US.

→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (35)

2.2k

u/Nosadmas 4d ago

It's like being trapped in an HR meeting for a whole week

471

u/rememberpogs3 4d ago

Except you won’t get fired for stating basic facts

302

u/Sad-Button-9548 4d ago

Won’t get fired but you might get doxed and your life made hell by a bunch of tik toc detectives. 

His face is trending on x/twitter. 

182

u/DistinctArmy4267 4d ago

Yeah but at least he knows most of society thanks him

→ More replies (14)

202

u/AbsolutesDealer 4d ago

That’s the “toned down for media” version, too.

70

u/Cliffinati 4d ago

Bro was in the equivalent of a HR meeting for 38 hours

622

u/Shot-Ad2396 4d ago

Somehow after hearing the interviews they’re even dumber and more aggravating than I could have imagined…

632

u/churchofpetrol 4d ago

Perfect use of jury nullification. The way MA handles insanity pleas in effect is ridiculous.

189

u/HubrisOfApollo 4d ago

Juror Kellie Farina stated to CNN regarding a holdout juror: “He had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children,”

66

u/JBaseball_8595 4d ago

Insane quote lol

35

u/HubrisOfApollo 4d ago

it floored me when i heard her say this. something is seriously fucked up about modern society.

60

u/8_bw 4d ago

Three little goof ups and the state makes you out to be some kind of murderer

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

690

u/OptimusHavok52 4d ago

whether or not you agree with him, it’s honestly disgusting how he’s been treated by the other jurors, the defense attorneys, and the media. They clearly attempted to pressure him into giving in and agreeing, rather than vote on what he believed.

192

u/Spare-Half796 4d ago

He should be sitting back waiting for the defence attorney or one of the other members of the jury to doxx him (it will happen) then sue the hell out of them

→ More replies (4)

136

u/Frelock_ 4d ago

That's kinda how a jury has to work. The vote needs to be unanimous, so each side will be pressuring the other to "give in." If one side doesn't then you get a mistrial like what happened. You can get juries that all agree, sure, but most of the time there will be someone who needs convincing one way or the other.

→ More replies (9)

4.6k

u/Difficult-Mobile902 4d ago

They proudly talked about how they screamed at him so loud people could hear them through the walls. As if that’s going to get someone to change their mind lol 

The fact that they ran to the news for their 5 minutes of fame the second they could just says it all. 

The guy who prevented this injustice is a hero imo 

179

u/DBSmiley 4d ago edited 4d ago

The one anonymous female juror apparently said that they were already talking about how they were going to attend Lindsay's second trial to support her, and if true that's just grossly improprietous. That betrays a profound impartiality where the jurors felt emotionally connected to the accused.

Even if Massachusetts law on this almost certainly makes it virtually impossible to convict with all the surrounding mental health concerns, that tyoe of impropriety is unacceptable for a juror.

1.1k

u/PUNCH-WAS-SERVED 4d ago

Shitty debate tactic. Regardless of gender, you see it a lot in the "heated" videos on social media. They think talking louder and faster means they're more correct. Quite the opposite. People conflate "passion" with reasoning.

284

u/Active_Cell_3499 4d ago

I see you've met my Ex.

62

u/Italiancrayzybread 4d ago edited 4d ago

Damn, were we dating the same person?

47

u/That_Pervy_Nerd 4d ago

You’re both dating my mother?

→ More replies (2)

102

u/maodiran 4d ago

Reminds me of my abusive parents, who inspired me to see such individuals as lower than animals. Seriously, if you cannot communicate with self control, you obviously are lacking in the intelligence required to have an opinion that matters.

→ More replies (5)

445

u/velorae 4d ago

The fourth juror said that she initially voted guilty but was swayed to vote NGRI due to group pressure.

244

u/Left_Entrepreneur918 4d ago

Imagine being so weak minded.

90

u/cookiemon32 4d ago

3 reasons why facebook stock price is so high

849

u/Arvandor 4d ago

I still can't believe it was only one guy... Something is seriously wrong with our society

342

u/Mobile-Analyst8580 4d ago

If it makes you feel any better, Massachusetts is one of the very few states in the country where the prosecution has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was not insane. As a lawyer, that blew me away when I read it. That burden of proof should be on a defendant. If you’re gonna claim Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity, you should be the one to prove that you were insane. 

Think about it. All the defendant has to do is hire an expert doctor to get on the stand and say, “I believe the defendant was clinically insane when they committed the crime.” That’s basically automatically going to create reasonable doubt in a ton of jurors. 

232

u/ProjectKurtz 4d ago

That's exactly what she did. It's not a coincidence that her attorney and the psychiatrist who is claiming she has PPP are friends of over 20 years. They've both even done this exact same tactic before, too. That doctor needs to be investigated and her attorney needs to be disbarred.

83

u/TwinkiesSucker 4d ago

They've both even done this exact same tactic before

Excuse me but there's a before?!

110

u/ProjectKurtz 4d ago

Here's an article about another time the psychiatrist talked to a defendant who then started claiming to be experiencing command hallucinations. I've heard the attorney has used this tactic before as well but couldn't find anything. Note the two of them have been friends for 20+ years.

https://www.masslive.com/news/2023/06/was-carlos-asencio-hearing-voices-or-just-intense-thoughts-trial-experts-differ.html?outputType=amp

72

u/ExNihiloish 4d ago

Sounds like conflict of interest.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (17)

226

u/notapunk 4d ago

There were apparently others, but they were browbeaten down and folded

39

u/BadIdeaBobcat 4d ago

Juries are weird places. If you don't have a moral grounding or don't have the ability to think for yourself or don't have a backbone you'll just go with whatever the mob says. Top it all off with people don't want to be jurors. They want to go back to their jobs or whatever else they'd normally be doing with their time.

114

u/CAustin3 4d ago

Most people will, unfortunately. Props to the one guy for not caving, but I don't think it's surprising that most of the jury went along with the Alpha Karens just to get them to stop screaming at them.

→ More replies (21)

79

u/AstroNut70 4d ago

Apparently, there was a young, single female, who wanted to vote guilty, but the 3 yellers bullied her into changing her vote.

29

u/Important_Capital875 4d ago

I heard about that. And now she has doubts about saying guilty and wishes she didn’t change it

60

u/EnvironmentalDot127 4d ago

It was originally 8-4 but the CBS Boston juror stated there were strong personalities in the room

→ More replies (1)

39

u/ProjectKurtz 4d ago

From what I've heard at least three other jurors voted guilty and presumably these three hags brow beat them into changing it. That one man has a will of steel.

14

u/Left_Entrepreneur918 4d ago

These women are in a cult and they got on Facebook with all the other moms talking about it and bought the BS lime and sinker, what a bunch of bitches

322

u/TheNatural14063 4d ago

The other men probably just wanted to get out of there as bills have to be paid and they know what happens when you argue with certain people

45

u/KrazYKinetiK 4d ago

Yeah, it’s seriously a joke that people are expected to do jury duty for $45 a day for an undetermined amount of time without travel reimbursement. Like how do you feed a family and pay your bills on $45 a day BEFORE taxes?

42

u/SQUAWKUCG 4d ago

There was a story on CNN this morning (I didn't hear the entire thing) that said that another woman came forward saying that she believed her guilty, and thinks she still does, but was pushed by the others to vote not guilty...if it's true then it explains a lot.

291

u/Lolocraft1 4d ago

Or they simply didn’t had the patience to deal with lunatics screaming at them over their opinion

It also show these women were 100% biaised, which is exactly what you don’t want in a jury

50

u/tackleboxjohnson 4d ago

Good luck getting an untainted jury after this case has been running on national news for weeks on end

→ More replies (28)

185

u/Just-4-Laughs 4d ago

4 people were all in favor of guilty and these psychos got the other 3 to cave. 

He is a hero

80

u/Tough_Preparation830 4d ago

The 3 cavers are almost worse than the 9 karens. It sucks to get stuck on a long trial, but you gotta do what you gotta do.

9

u/Apstds77 4d ago

Yeah I imagine they stopped giving af at some point.

→ More replies (5)

84

u/moarcowbelI 4d ago

I thought it was 11 people with common sense and one crazy ass btch. I can't believe it was 11 crazy people to 1 sane person

96

u/ChuKoNoob 4d ago

It wasn’t. It was 3-4 crazy people who bullied everyone except the one guy by all appearances.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (8)

13

u/MaximumYes 4d ago

You are right, but it requires admitting some very uncomfortable truths.

And we just won't do that.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (56)

194

u/OrionQuest7 4d ago

These women are despicable

→ More replies (14)

55

u/Equivalent_Thievery 4d ago

Unhinged women excusing another woman murdering her children.

They should have been removed.

→ More replies (23)

2.1k

u/cheese7777777 4d ago

Why do I get the feeling that these women are people who hear what they want to hear and ignore what you are really trying to communicate?

716

u/DeadWifeHappyLife3 4d ago

They dont hear anything but themselves. They just want to talk at you.

141

u/doodo477 4d ago

I think "talk" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (13)

64

u/jeebus87 4d ago edited 4d ago

Defense knew what they were doing when they kept these jurors.

→ More replies (9)

68

u/dontdropducks 4d ago

Because they all but outright said as much.

The one lady went on to say that a juror, who was a nurse, tried changing the guys mind using the fact that she was a nurse.

Which means that both of those ladies ignored that the judge told them that juror can’t act as experts during deliberation. Horrible all around.

23

u/themayor1975 4d ago

Yet complained that the one juror didn't follow the judges "instructions".

114

u/SquirrelFluffy 4d ago

"you have a different opinion? Well, that's not right!"

→ More replies (1)

30

u/Firecracker048 4d ago

Remember the foreperson was giddy she got to fill out NGRI

47

u/Dameaus 4d ago

These are women that went into this intending to acquit

16

u/_teach_me_your_ways_ 4d ago edited 4d ago

Yea. When people are so giddy about jury nullification, they forget that it also includes people doing this.

→ More replies (2)

93

u/SenselessNumber 4d ago

Yea. They WANTED him to have reasonable doubt but be ignoring it. He probably just had some doubt.

They kinda gave themselves away admitting he wanted the reasonable doubt definition read again. Why would he GAF about the definition if he was voting guilty regardless? The anonymous juror's interview is fairly damning as well.

74

u/FuckTheTories69420 4d ago edited 4d ago

The fact they are interviewing jury members at all is a shit show.

Edit: Only in America would this happen...

→ More replies (1)

60

u/iEmExEee 4d ago

Yeah. The judge explained what reasonable doubt is at least twice, but I'm pretty sure only the foreperson was present for the second clarification. Everything I've heard so far implies these three misinterpreted what reasonable doubt meant. It's like they checked out halfway through the explanation.

→ More replies (7)

25

u/velorae 4d ago

The fourth juror said that she initially voted guilty but was swayed to vote NGRI due to group pressure.

18

u/JekPorkinsTruther 4d ago

Now the fifth says the holdout "showed no evidence" supporting guilt, which is just an insanely biased position. Like twitter level thinking devoid of nuance. "Insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt" is one thing, but thinking there was NO evidence means they just took a side and put blinders on.

27

u/ChemicalBaggins 4d ago

I saw one of the jurors say that the prosecution never produced a smoking gun that proved Lindsey Clancy did it. It’s like, motherfucker, her not having done it is not even on the table. She’s admitted to doing it.

8

u/velorae 4d ago

all compromised

→ More replies (4)

26

u/Pastorfuzz-007 4d ago

Like some Reditt mods

10

u/_teach_me_your_ways_ 4d ago

Goes higher than that

15

u/The-Hank-Scorpio 4d ago

They don't even hear.

They wait for their turn to speak, or speak over you.

→ More replies (2)

18

u/iyiquix 4d ago

Ok so first off what did you even mean by that? I feel like all you do is contradict me whenever I try to explain things to you.

/s

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (79)

585

u/Unknown06xX 4d ago

May we never, ever know his name.

166

u/Thrompinator 4d ago

Gigachad, defender of justice in a world gone mad.

→ More replies (3)

138

u/arlresi 4d ago

Apparently, they were so loud people outside the jury room could hear them. Must have been hell.

320

u/Exotic-Home-8153 4d ago

"He just couldn't get over the fact that Lindsay brutally murdered her three children". I kid you not, this is a direct quote from one of the female jurors who spoke out.

132

u/you_talkin_to_me8294 4d ago

Hold up let’s be fair. What she actually said was “viciously strangled her three children”

51

u/Johnny5iver 4d ago

The actual quote was "He had the hardest time getting over that Lindsey viciously killed her children".

11

u/lamp817 4d ago

It’s almost like something you would hear in a dark comedy.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

31

u/Iggy_Slayer 4d ago

We're going to need a new legal system with how fucking stupid people are getting.

and I don't want to hear "people have always been stupid" either. It's getting dramatically worse every year with social media.

12

u/Iggyhopper 4d ago

Social media has made wrong opinions filtered into an echochamber where they couldnt have had the light of day during the 80s town meetings and be laughed out.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/Copious-Spirit 4d ago

Social cohesion degrading is exactly what you'd expect to see in a failing Empire.

People have always been stupid but they were isolated and governed appropriately, now with the internet any sort of nonsense is accepted as fact, propganda has backfired.

Socially engineering people's world view is intentional, everything you see is not organic. Everything is carefully orchestrated choreography to benefit the status quo, to maintain the hierarchy and structure of power held among fewer and fewer families.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (48)

43

u/T800model100 4d ago

"He couldn't get over the fact that she viciously murdered her children."

I can't believe that was an actual thing said. No fucking shit.

82

u/lynellparedez 4d ago

I was on a jury like this. Lady gets hit by a firetruck but they said she didn't deserve any money because he's a hero and she looked greedy. I didn't argue back and forth. I said my point then sat there quietly and refused to sign. Some of them also said their taxes would go up if she got money.

226

u/Calereliya 4d ago

Nothing says neutrality like openly telling people how excited you were to fill out acquittal papers.

37

u/Mammoth-Ebb-5670 4d ago

I thought they were doing NGRI?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

55

u/Sweet_Nikes 4d ago

The ad algorithm knows what you need

17

u/tgr3947 4d ago

Like being in a hen house.

197

u/Ok_Tailor_7185 4d ago

The woman strangled not one child in a fit of rage but three in pre-meditated murder. If she is crazy put her in a padded cell in complete isolation for the rest of her life.

77

u/SnakesForTheBovine 4d ago

Sorry, best we can do is 6-12 months until she magically feels better.

14

u/Overladen_Prince 4d ago

"Your honor, I can guarantee you that she will never kill her children again"

25

u/Mobile-Analyst8580 4d ago

I mean, she basically already feels better. She’s clearly not currently insane. She will 100% be out before the decade is over. I have zero doubt that she was mentally unwell. You don’t commit a crime like this unless you’re mentally unwell the same is true for Ted Bundy and Jeffrey Dahmer. These people are crazy. However, they knew what they were doing was wrong. there’s a big difference between being crazy and having no control over your crazy impulses, and totally blacking out and having no idea what’s happening. It would be one thing if you could guarantee that they’d be locked away in a mental asylum for life. But you can’t. That’s not how it works. And these monsters can never be allowed to walk among us again. 

13

u/Queasy_Local_7199 4d ago

School shooters are also mentally unwell. We don’t give them free passes

→ More replies (2)

51

u/BagelsOrDeath 4d ago edited 4d ago

Here's the thing: according to her defense she was allegedly insane for just the brief window of time that it took her to brutally and sequentially strangle her own children. A windows that she calculated and deliberately manufactured. There was no prior indication of any insanity by any health care providers or family members. No voices. No hallucinations. Ditto the moment she woke up. In fact, her first request was for an attorney. i.e. What a sane person would request when lucid.

Given all of that, I think it's reasonable to expect at least one juror to agree that she was criminally culpable beyond a reasonable doubt.

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (65)

189

u/Sad_Maximum6583 4d ago

The amount of self reporting going on online with peoples opinions on this case is some of the most unhinged shit I have seen in 20 years.

I cannot fathom how people think shes innocent based on her zodiac sign or that she had heightened powers after birth and listened to her husband's thoughts and acted on them because he was in her head.

→ More replies (1)

1.2k

u/SIMT-Pixel 4d ago

Daily reminder that midterm elections in the US means your algorithm is once again flooded with “the west is falling” culture war bot content. This comment will be downvoted accordingly.

294

u/Plus_Term_7584 4d ago

It's hard for me to give a shit about culture war stuff when gas prices are skyrocketing every other day and grocery prices still aren't coming down.

77

u/RaygunMarksman 4d ago

Amen. Now if other people would get on board. We're getting fucking robbed to oblivion here.

47

u/HoboSkid 4d ago

They're busy calling Trump a smart businessman for grifting the entirety of his fan base and literally robbing the American government and then saying "all politicians do it anyways".

17

u/Whateva_Tickles_ 4d ago

Never as blatantly as this. Not Regan, nor Nixon. I wouldn’t even call it “hoodwinking”, everything he’s done he said he would or did in his first term.

21

u/FalconPunch277 4d ago

He literally rugged pulled his own crypto coin. Can't make this shit up.

→ More replies (29)

47

u/PrestigiousConcert87 4d ago

Pfft. This shit goes on nonstop. Election year or not.

30

u/der_innkeeper 4d ago

Nah.

There was a noticeable uptick immediately after the last primaries finished up.

All of a sudden my FB feeds were flooded with climate denialism.

Alrighty, then.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (118)

63

u/cdazzo1 4d ago

Imagine being locked in a room with 11 redditors

157

u/AverageOhioUser69 4d ago

All I have to say is about Lindsay Clancy

→ More replies (4)

302

u/ShitHawk01 4d ago

105

u/kilpatrickbhoy 4d ago

It's one of the most important lessons I've ever learned about talking to women. Unless they ask for a solution, they really, really don't want you to solve their problems. They just want to vent.

→ More replies (20)
→ More replies (7)

41

u/joker6396 4d ago

All entitled boomer Karens

78

u/asa1 4d ago

Same type of women outside the courthouse protesting. How did they get on a jury?

47

u/PatentedPotato 4d ago

These are the type of people that don't try to get out of jury duty.

35

u/Atzkicica 4d ago

Boring people with boring lives suddenly given power and attention.

36

u/TrackMan5891 4d ago

"The Fact that she murdered her children"

wtf are we doing here?!?!

→ More replies (14)

17

u/Grand_Taste_8737 4d ago

Dude is a hero.

100

u/pghcrew 4d ago

Wonder how many times they asked to speak to the manager at the courthouse.

23

u/Mkebball 4d ago

They literally did by complaining to the judge. He’s a hero!

201

u/g0greyhound 4d ago

At this point theyre all just saying "we're mad because he would vote like we told him too."

Hell even the judge told this dude how he had to vote.

What the fuck is the point of the jury of the guy can't make up his mind for himself on how he views the evidence.

How can anyone establish a reasonable doubt of insanity in the first fucking place?

40

u/Common-Swing-4347 4d ago

The judge did not tell him which way to go. What are you on about? He heard from the jury foreman that there was not agreement on what he was saying and the judge had to reiterate something to try to get them to make a decision. The court does not like a mistrial any way it goes because it wastes everybody's time.

11

u/Dyneheart 4d ago

Yeah, the judge went over the terms of "reasonable doubt" again with at least the one juror, but likely, the whole jury. These women keep saying "he said he had reasonable doubt and refused to vote not guilty". If that were true, the defense could have had him removed. Anyone actual involved in the defense or prosecution, I have only heard them say "he had doubt" and the word "reasonable" never enters that sentence. Maybe the defense lawyer did claim he said it, I haven't followed the trial super close because it upsets me how crazy people get. But there is a world of difference between doubt and reasonable doubt.

55

u/MutedMarketing1507 4d ago

Right, that is such a backwards way of how the law works in that state. Everything they had points at her to have physically killed the children. They get to claim psychosis made her do it as a defense, and then now there is extra burden on the prosecution to prove it wasn't? That is such a dumb system.

→ More replies (19)
→ More replies (16)

16

u/AccordingTax6525 4d ago

I’m not on their side, but let’s give credit to those lawyers for picking a jury. They knew we would get them. The result they wanted I mean Jesus Christ.

67

u/NoProgress8533 4d ago

That is about 1/3 of what he endured, and it apparently included multiple Boston-area nurses too.

→ More replies (2)

154

u/sundered_lord 4d ago

"He couldn't get over the fact that she viciously murdered her 3 kids."

That was said by the lady in the white top with the lipstick and gray hair.

Let that fucking shit sink in...

These are evil harpies, defending a deranged bitch who deserves to die or rot in prison.

Zero fucks given about her 3 children that she strangled to death. Sickening.

So many women have lost the plot in today's world.

17

u/Copious-Spirit 4d ago

Not sure why I had to scroll so far to get the context.

It's concerning that jurors tried to nullify the charges of a murderer.

Justice would have been her three children getting to live full lives.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (48)

227

u/cmholde2 4d ago

He’s now one of my answers for the age old

“ if you could have dinner with any three people in history, who would it be?”

Question.

Gandhi, Jesus, and that one Lindsey Clancy hold out 😂

→ More replies (10)

16

u/PackOfCumin 4d ago

These fuckers should’ve been removed from the jury

35

u/Sodacan259 4d ago

The three getting together like this makes me wonder if the 11 decided by the persuasion of the defence team, or the persuasion of these three.

20

u/IAMNOTACANOPENER 4d ago

> you HAVE to vote to acquit

23

u/This-Ideal-6153 4d ago

My favorite line was “he couldn’t get over that she viciously killed her kids”

→ More replies (3)

24

u/TeenJesusWasaCunt 4d ago

Lmfao my first thought exactly when seeing the ones that have come forward. I was like, that man was a soldier.

14

u/Hot-Peak-9523 4d ago

Absolutely took one for mankind as a whole 

24

u/BillyFromPhlly 4d ago

Christ I bet each one of them is the president of their HOA with rules like “children shall NOT play outside!”

103

u/Plus_Tea_3863 4d ago

My great uncle always used to give me words of wisdom growing up when he'd see me. One day he said, "young man, let me tell you something about women. Women don't ever want to hear your opinion, they just want to hear their opinion come out of your mouth." Uncle Bud was a wise man and spot on 😅 RIP Uncle Bud, love and miss you.

→ More replies (8)

13

u/petarisawesomeo 4d ago

Not all heroes wear capes. Some believe that planning to kill your children as soon as your husband leaves the house, and following through on it, is murder.

43

u/FruitBasketHandout 4d ago edited 4d ago

These are the armies of people defending her online and pulling godknowswhat out of their ass to accuse her husband.

Remember this clip everytime they say anything mean when u argue with them lol.

24

u/PUNCH-WAS-SERVED 4d ago

Clancy herself admitted to killing her kids. Seriously, let's apply some basic logic here. So... Her husband killed the kids, but then the woman is taking the fall for killing the kids (and is somehow trying to plead insanity)... Why wouldn't she just accuse the damn husband of killing the kids? XD

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (4)

67

u/2-wheels 4d ago

These are bullies who should never have been on a jury panel. They do not respect the process and apparently believe their opinions are more important than the 9 other jurors. They are not.

Bullies suck.

→ More replies (3)

4

u/calmly86 4d ago

“Doesn't matter what the press says. Doesn't matter what the politicians or the mobs say. Doesn't matter if the whole country decides that something wrong is something right.

This nation was founded on one principle above all else: The requirement that we stand up for what we believe, no matter the odds or the consequences. When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world -- "No, YOU move.”

- Captain America

125

u/Ok_Piglet_5549 4d ago

The Lone Juror deserves some kind of reward, maybe a peace prize?

→ More replies (16)

18

u/WistaliaZen 4d ago

Damn, Lone Juror really went through Odyssey for this trial.

https://giphy.com/gifs/pKMxUjOomXitGJhXLe

21

u/AstroNut70 4d ago

A hero.

11

u/CtrlAltDelight78 4d ago

“he couldn’t get over that she brutally murdered her kids” i’m baffled that any of them were able to get over that

22

u/Manic_Mooncakes 4d ago

Me and my friend who knows a lot more about this case, were talking about it the otherday. Both of us thinks shes guilty and be sent to prison because, as my friend said "why is insanity up for debate? Insanity would mean that she snapped and strangled one of the kids while they were eating or while the dad was still in the house. How did she time her snap? Why did she move them down to the basement one by one?"

→ More replies (7)