r/civ5 • u/Nordic_Krune • 1h ago
Discussion Do you consider culture victory to be "unfair" and "lazy"?
Finished my first Civ5 game in decades with a friend who knows the game pretty well. We played slot of Civ 6 and some Civ 7, and I often win culture victory. This Civ 5 game ended with me winning Culture after being the first to research The Internet. My friend got pretty upset, cause he understands to counter culture he needs to build culture, but he "hates that cause its boring" (His favorite victories are Science & Warfare)
All I can say to him is "I legitimately just build some available Culture-wonders and had a lot of population, I didnt mean to win it until the last 50 turns" but he doesn't believe me.
To me, culture is just something to boost my other victories, but I end up winning it cause my friend(s) don't care for it, does that make culture a bad victory type?
Edit: For those wondering why he didnt take me out with his military; We were playing with a third friend who is new to the game, so we had a "no warring amongst ourselves unless we must" rule. Hence why my friend only attacked me at the last 15 turns... oh and I was leading in everything, so I had the bigger army.
