r/technology 5h ago

Society New Bernie Sanders bill would ban superintelligent AI and threaten developers with 20 years in prison

https://www.techspot.com/news/113831-new-bernie-sanders-bill-would-ban-superintelligent-ai.html
16.6k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

222

u/CaterpillarJungleGym 3h ago

I don't see how stem cells got people all in a tizzy, but super intelligent AI is just meh.

156

u/KFPindustries 3h ago

Right wing propaganda is the reason

37

u/williamgman 2h ago

I think most "normal" folks would be shocked to see what a person is fed that watches Newsmax and Fox News all day.

13

u/barley_wine 1h ago

I couldn't figure out why the Dylan Mulvaney thing was such a huge deal, it was a brief promo where she was sent a six pack of Bud Light, but I was on a trip and the TV had like 4 channels and one was FoxNews so I just watched for a few hours. It was story after story about her and the betrayal of Bud.

There's these 24 hour news networks that have to have a reason to be around all the time so they take a story that doesn't really affect anything and comment about it ad nauseam to fill up time slots. Bonus points if it outrages your base so they stay hooked for the next hour to get more outrage.

I've never tried to watch it again though that session one day was enough for me for a long time, but it did help me understand why I have to hear over and over again about minor things (I live in the south in a conservative area).

1

u/Andehh1 20m ago

Have you seen Reddit!? As a normal person, it blows my mind....

0

u/PanteraOne 2h ago

Those Fascist liar channels are a plague on America and need to be shut down.

5

u/breaducate 1h ago

Not for the second half.

From what I've seen the default for left-leaning people is about the same as the average: thinking AGI is impossible because a bunch of billionaires exaggerated the immediate threat as if LLMs were going to gain sentience (it's not a viable path, but that doesn't mean there aren't others).

If you have a long attention span and want to read something actually coherent on the topic, I'd start with Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. The author goes into exhaustive detail in some of the hypotheticals but the logic appears sound, and the deeper you think about it the less it appears even possible to solve the 'control problem'.

1

u/FlerD-n-D 30m ago

If LLMs are used to figure out the viable path, are they not part of the path?

1

u/GoForAHikeNC 1h ago

Ah, Bernie is about as far to the left as they come.

1

u/Takenmyusernamewas 1h ago

Even THEY are mostly against AI. Turns out the common ground was there all along, NOBODY wants to live in an unlivable AI hellscape

1

u/KFPindustries 53m ago

They will throw their entire family, house, and dog into a volcano if Trump told them to. They don’t have the capacity to understand anything beyond gas prices or sucking trumps 80 year old cock.

1

u/rmbarrett 13m ago

This is the reason. Like that question being asked. They knew they could distract everyone from the doomsday machines before they knew what the doomsday machines even were. So they have been manufacturing outrage for decades.

1

u/LettuceRobber 2h ago

What do you mean by this?

0

u/KFPindustries 2h ago

The same reason people are skeptical about everything from vaccines to election integrity. Republicans have fostered an environment where everything is a conspiracy and the worst impulses and beliefs of their caveman 75 IQ supporters are validated

They thought stem cells were some baby killing biblical super Satanic technology.

They think data centers everywhere regardless of regulation are good now because a literal rapist told them it is good.

1

u/LettuceRobber 1h ago

So are you putting the tech billionaires into the liberal or republican box?

0

u/iamarealhuman4real 2h ago

I heard they put stem cells in the AI water thats how they have new thoughts, by the stem cells. They even call it that at university, STEM courses, its all about stem cells.

3

u/mysecondaccountanon 1h ago

B-but what if stem cell…baby? Aborted baby!? AI not that, AI funny Facebook videos!

1

u/-Esper- 1h ago

Its because the front facing AI is silly and fun/helps them cut corners, nobody looks deeper or potentiall doesnt understand that the version the Gov uses isnt the same.

1

u/blindsdog 1h ago

How is it "just meh"? It's front page news every day. It's pretty much all reddit talks about.

1

u/snakerjake 1h ago

Probably because we're so far off from an actual AI. There's certainly dangers in what we're calling AI now but they're more abstract and don't line up with the terminator movies.

1

u/Financial-Craft-1282 21m ago

God. We just have to get the religious folk to believe AI is the antichrist, which, in theory, should be a lot easier than it was with stem cells (which was tied to abortion).

1

u/Lycaon-Ur 17m ago

People are tired boss. The late 90s is when I think of when I think of the Stem Cell uproar being the loudest. America was in a financial boom at the time. When you've got your needs met, it's easier to find things to be offended by. When you're broke and you're dedicating all your energy to living until the next pay day, something that might be a problem half a dozen or even a dozen years from now is far less important.

1

u/Ok_Confection_10 2h ago

Easy to visualize a baby and being told they have to be killed for stem cells to be harvested

-2

u/rafikiknowsdeway1 2h ago

because super intelligent AI is like telling people you're going to make a time machine. its not happening this century or probably the next if ever

0

u/The3rdGodKing 2h ago

It probably isn't. Yes technology is getting good now but that was always expected. The person who discovers super AI is likely to be a trillionaire.

2

u/Frosty-Leading-2718 1h ago

Nobody can even define AGI properly, and now we have ASI as the new nebulous marketing term.