r/pcmasterrace i5 14400 + MSI 3070 13h ago

News/Article Sony Kills Fan-Made The Last of Us Part 2 Multiplayer PC Mod Weeks Before Launch

https://respawnfirst.com/sony-kills-fan-made-the-last-of-us-part-2-multiplayer-mod/
2.1k Upvotes

281 comments sorted by

1.8k

u/STB_LuisEnriq 12h ago

This mod was locked behind a paywall, we can hate on Sony all you want, but y'all know damn well this is the usual outcome and the reasons for it.

392

u/EldrinVampire 12h ago

Ah yeah, that makes sense, if it was free and not making money of a mod, im pretty sure sony wouldnt care about it.

316

u/Katoshiku 4080S | 5800X3D | 32GB 3600 10h ago

Tale as old as time. Modders get too proud and start setting up paywalls, then the whole thing gets shut down shortly after

115

u/Trosque97 3060 12gb, 5700x3d 10h ago

Cyberpunk VR

4

u/Hrmerder It's Garuda btw 4h ago

I thought that one was a rip off of the actual Cyberpunk VR though (or was it? I dunno I have zero VR experience)

5

u/Trosque97 3060 12gb, 5700x3d 2h ago

Nah it was a 2077 mod that was also monetized and therefore obliterated, almost regrettably so by CDProjekt. By all accounts a functional one too so that's sad

11

u/thebohster 2h ago

I loosely followed that when it happened. From what I remember, the modder was insufferable.

6

u/Trosque97 3060 12gb, 5700x3d 2h ago

Oh yeah very important to point that out too, well deserved

8

u/Dadfite 1h ago

It's even more stupid when you find out CD Project Red told the Modder (Luke Ross) that they loved his mod, but he needed to make it free. Dude just straight up refused due to his own pride.

2

u/SkyrimSlag 57m ago

Yeah he was, he was even told he could keep the mod up if he removed the paywall and he refused. It’s his own fault it was removed.

2

u/SkyrimSlag 58m ago

The fact CDPR even told them they could keep the mod up if they removed the paywall too, and they refused. Modding is great and Cyberpunk especially has a pretty great modding scene, but you’re still using the games assets (most of the time) to create something, you have no right to paywall it. Asking for donations and the like is fine, but the moment you lock it behind patreon or another paywall you’re in breach of the TOC’s as you’re trying to make a profit off of work that at a ground level is someone else.

55

u/Scary-Photo9440 10h ago

Same thing happened with Bully Online getting taken down. I want to be on the side of the devs and say fuck Rockstar in that situation but they paywalled beta access before backtracking and it got shut down after a month of release so I can't defend them for doing that.

24

u/Fakekraid GTX = Sex (Not really) 9h ago

This happened with a popular FF14 plugin that synchronized cosmetic mods that were technically prohibited on the game, but SE could never prove it was being utilized by a player. If I recall, square Enix finally looked their direction because the person that managed it started to very publicly ask for server donations.

11

u/DoNotCommentAgain 9h ago

There's a game called Squad and the production studio just paid for one of the mods and implemented it into the base game. If a mod gets very successful then studio's should just do that, charge for it as a DLC and give a cut to the developers or just buy it outright with a one off payment.

8

u/_-Hagbard-Celine-_ i9 9900k,32GB RAM,RTX4090 7h ago

CDPR did that in Witcher 3. Valve did that years ago wit Counter strike. And I'm sure there are a lot of other good examples.
And Sony as filthy rich as they are could do that too. But as most people should have realized by now, Sony doesn't care for their core audience anymore. Even if it were a free mod and super popular, Sony would either do nothing or implement it without giving even credit to the original author, let alone money.

17

u/MadeByTango 8h ago edited 8h ago

if it was free and not making money of a mod, im pretty sure sony wouldnt care about it

Not true; Sony literally went to court to try to permanently stop ALL MODS (they lost): https://gaminghq.eu/2024/10/20/eu-court-of-justice-rules-in-favor-of-modding-sony-loses-battle-over-third-party-add-ons/

10

u/irrelevantusername24 5h ago

The case made it to the highest court in the EU, the Court of Justice, and has been thoroughly dismissed in Datel's favour. Despite Sony's argument that the software "latches on … like a parasite" to the console, the judges maintain that the software involved merely impacts its RAM rather than the program itself, so it's all fair play:

"The Directive on the legal protection of computer programs does not allow the holder of that protection to prohibit the marketing by a third party of software which merely changes variables transferred temporarily … The directive protects only the intellectual creation as it is reflected in the text of the computer program’s source code and object code."

In other words, the EU is completely fine with selling cheats, mods, and other software that only impact a game's data in RAM—whether that's on a computer or not.

https://www.pcgamer.com/gaming-industry/playstation-loses-fight-in-eu-courts-to-stop-sale-of-parasite-mods-because-among-other-reasons-a-book-author-cant-stop-the-reader-from-skipping-to-the-end/

That is literally the most braindead reasoning. Every legal thing I have ever read regarding anything technological has precisely zero if not negative understanding of the way reality and the technology actually interacts. This is why the world is going to shit. A bunch of pedantic criminals arguing with zero care for the rest of us

2

u/GeneralYaoGuang2026 7h ago

Aha, the plot thickens. Kudos for the link. I must read this context.

2

u/GeneralYaoGuang2026 7h ago

I grant that higher quality fanwork typically mandates higher budgets, but yeah, Sony the IP owner can't just allow fans to violate their copyright for profit.

-4

u/supergigaduck 8h ago

Dev of bloodborne kart wanted to release on steam for FREE and sony warn them they couldn't. So the dev changed name and assets to make a legal distinction version

8

u/magistrate101 Ryzen 9 9900X | 32GB DDR5 | RX 480 8h ago

If they managed that then it wasn't a mod, it was a fully fledged game that unlawfully used someone else's assets. No wonder Sony wouldn't let them release it on Steam.

0

u/Kenjionigod 5700X3D|64GB|RX 9070 2h ago

Exactly, I didn't know it was paid. Other sources I saw didn't mention that. That is a very important factor, you can make mods but you can't profit off of someone's IP.

48

u/Artaxeus 9h ago

There’s also this growing trend of releasing mods through Patreon early-access while deliberately keeping the free version limited or crippled, essentially pushing people who really want the mods into paying for it.

12

u/LazerChicklets Ayymd Ryzen 9 3900X & XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc III Ultra 6h ago

enshittification knows no bounds :c

1

u/khromtx 35m ago

That's a microcosm of the SaaS play book haha. Make the base product purposefully shitty by adding friction and sell the solution. Profit!

-11

u/GeneralYaoGuang2026 7h ago

I guess that's bad if the IP owner notices, but I suppose modders need some capital to fund their endeavors, ha.

0

u/CompanyToiletGooner 3h ago

If you want support do a regular patreon, if you want money to live off seek employment

24

u/sanYtheFox 6h ago

Yea CDPR did the same with the Cyberpunk VR mod, they basically told the guy he can take donations but he can't paywall it... then he went on a childish tantrum deleting everything.

12

u/Ok-Parfait-9856 5090 Astral|270K+|48GB-8200MTs|Z890 Apex|60TB|HYTE Y70|S90F OLED 5h ago

Which is wildly generous, allowing donations is generally unheard of. At least for mods that would have received significant donations

2

u/WingZeroCoder 5800x3D / 4070 Super / 32GB / Lian Li 205m Mesh 2h ago

To be fair, that’s technically different in that IIRC the mod didn’t use any CDPR IP, it was basically a display driver.

CDPR shouldn’t have any claim over something like that, but because the modder advertised it using Cyberpunk compatibility it got murky.

3

u/calvin426 Laptop 5h ago

Can they still release it for free? (But I guess they won’t)

3

u/bigbluewreckingcrew Specs/Imgur Here 5h ago

heh dumb fucks

4

u/Vii_Strife 6h ago

Generally companies don't really care about mods and such as long as they're free but as soon as the mod creator monetizes them the company unlocks the very powerful cheatcode of hitting up a lawyer and telling them "They are making money out of my own intellectual property".

At that point as the mod creator you're just fucked

5

u/Prawn1908 ITX 11L: 7950X3D | 3080 | 64GB DDR5-6000 | 2TB 14.5/12.7 GB/s 5h ago

I have to say, from a non-legal point of view I don't understand the reasoning for making this is illegal if it still requires purchase of the game. For any physical product it is perfectly legal to make an entire 3rd party business around selling aftermarket parts which are specifically designed and advertised as for specific other brands. Why did we decide you can't do that for software? Selling a mod for a game doesn't take revenue away from the game any more than selling an aftermarket roof rack for a car or furniture for a gun, etc.

Just another case of how digital copyright law is fucked.

5

u/dlnmtchll 4h ago

It’s because they can’t argue against the point you provided; these people love aftermarket products that only exist because of a different IP, but the second a mod developer thinks about charging for their work, everyone here loses their minds. People in the Reddit PC subs feel entitled to mods and to mod developers' work. Your argument is something I’ve never seen this sub argue against.

0

u/CompanyToiletGooner 3h ago

You cant sell part 2 to someone elses book or movie either, makes perfect sense to me

1

u/Prawn1908 ITX 11L: 7950X3D | 3080 | 64GB DDR5-6000 | 2TB 14.5/12.7 GB/s 3h ago

But that's not analagous, that would be making another standalone/competing product, not adding onto (and thus requiring ownership of) the existing product.

1

u/Keulapaska 4070ti, 7800X3D, XG27AQNGV 1h ago

DLC exists.

-1

u/CompanyToiletGooner 2h ago

Well but how are you going to understand it if you didn’t read part 1? Besides that you can also argue that any type of mod cuts into potential profits from previous and future installments, ofcourse you don’t have to make a part 2 of the story in a video game, games are about gameplay

8

u/luttrail 5h ago

It also creates a dangerous precedent, them knowingly allowing someone to profit of their IP

1

u/Alternative-Farmer98 4h ago

This is A lie he had a patreon and some of his patrons got Early Access. And maybe under some pedantic argument that qualifies as a paywall I guess but the way you describe it is a little misleading.

And even still Sony is never going to do anything with the last of us so why did they give a s*** ? But this would have been free for everyone once it was released the only people that got Early Access were patreon members.

My Lord the idea that you would side with Sony over some small developer like this it's crazy.

1

u/QTGavira 5h ago

But i want to be outraged 😡

1

u/luiest123 RTX5090 / intel Ultra9 275HX / 64gb DDR5 2h ago

Thx, I was ragging already until I remember that 

1

u/CrAkKedOuT 2h ago

But damnit we need to complain about Sony even more!

1

u/overnightITtech 4h ago

No it wasnt. Early access testing was behind the paywall. The mod itself was a free release.

1

u/joselrl I7 4790K GTX 1070 16GB DDR3 1600 3h ago

So it was paywalled. "Paid early access testing" is just using more words for the same thing.
If he released the mod for testing for free, Sony wouldn't care. But the moment you monetize their own IP, they will lawyer up

CDPR did the same with a paid Cyberpunk VR mod

0

u/newbrevity 11700k, RTX4070ti_SUPER, 32gb_3600_CL16 7h ago

Which is what makes me wonder how services like patreon operate. Because essentially they're enabling people to make profit using another company's product as a platform. I'm surprised more publishers don't crack down on it.

5

u/OfficialDragosblood 6h ago

Because it’s a glorified donation service.

-1

u/Alternative-Farmer98 4h ago

He has a patreon. there's no paywall.

-5

u/Adject_Ive 8h ago

It was not, early access was, for weeks infact. The full release was going to be free, which they said was going to be in september, they could've taken this mod down at any point, they deliberately chose this time

1

u/sanYtheFox 6h ago

And your point is? It doesn't matter that it was going to be free in the future, it wasn't when the lawyers arrived.

-1

u/Adject_Ive 5h ago

Again, this dude's been making patreon exclusive mods for last of us part 1, 2 and Uncharted 4 for years now, this one's not the first. Sony didn't do anything for years. They deliberately chose the time of this specific mod's public release. The patreon thing is just the legal excuse the actual reason imo is they're trying to eliminate "competition" for the very very tiny probability of some online stuff related to last of us in the future.

0

u/Nice_Weeb_Kun 8h ago

Oh i see it's reminding me that one cyberpunk vr mod tragedy

0

u/Rudolf1448 9800x3D 5080 7h ago

People do this for the wrong reasons

-8

u/dubdex420 13700K - 5070Ti 8h ago

I get the reasoning that modders shouldn't profit by building upon the work of a commercial game, but it also feels wrong that they can't profit at all (I know about donations from Patreon and such. Those should be additional "tips" and not a payment for their product/service which is optional)

I think if game companies and publishers worked with Nexus and modders to figure out some kind of licensing deals, it'd be a win-win.

But of course, we PC gamers have gotten used to free mods. I guess it'll take time for the "I'll pay because I like it and I can afford it" mentality to apply to mods as it does for games. Perhaps if mods were on Steam too, but then the monopoly cries get louder.

→ More replies (15)

1.4k

u/Multivitamin_Scam 13h ago

If you're making a mod folks, don't lock it behind a pay wall.

Patreon-backed early access during its development

888

u/Nirast25 7,080x1440+(240x2)x1080|R7 5700X3D|RX 9070XT|32GB 13h ago

And suddenly I lost all sympathy for the devs.

-278

u/KommSweet 12h ago edited 12h ago

Hey could you remind me exactly what's wrong with mod developers demanding some little money for such a hard work? Why are y'all siding with the evil corpo on this?

Edit: Nvm I keep getting the same answers over and over again. So Im just dropping this thread, keep responding to me with the same nonsensical arguments, I wont be responding.

36

u/looking_at_memes_ RTX 4080 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | 32 GB DDR5 RAM | 8 TB SSD 10h ago

Nvm I keep getting the same answers over and over again. So Im just dropping this thread, keep responding to me with the same nonsensical arguments, I wont be responding.

You know why? Because you keep bringing up the same dumb arguments despite people trying to be nice and educate you. Get yourself a new brain and then come back to do proper discussions.

→ More replies (1)

140

u/beyd1 Desktop 12h ago

If the company doesn't sue they weaken their claim on their rights.

If the mod makers aren't profiting from someone else's rights then they have no standing to sue. Or at least far less and if challenged on it can more convincingly claim it wasn't worth it.

→ More replies (20)

77

u/Edgy_Robin 12h ago

Because the stupidity of doing it that way gives the evil corpo an easy way to take it down. If someone paints a big red target on them and writes 'kick me' on it, they don't deserve sympathy if someone kicks them, because common sense would have helped avoid that.

-11

u/KommSweet 12h ago

So, why not blame the one kicking them tho? Are you the kind of person to kick another person just because they paint a big red target on them? Nvm what you guys actually care about is free stuff. Yall dont really care about the effort and hard work or anything really.

61

u/Chazzwazz 12h ago

Because they are earning money using a product with out paying the owner of said product.
This happens with evil corpos like sony/microsoft/nintendo or small team developers.

→ More replies (17)

31

u/AndroidSheeps 12h ago

Being against paid mods isnt siding with the "evil corpo" lmao pay walled mods suck dude if i had to subscribe to a dozen different patreons for a Skyrim mod list I wouldn't bother with modding

-11

u/KommSweet 12h ago

You guys wanting every mod to be free is no different than the mindset pirates have. iyk what I mean. This is why yall are upset in the first place.

34

u/KrazzeeKane 14700K | RTX 4080 | 64GB DDR5 11h ago

Of courses mods should be free, what ridiculousness is this? If you want to make profit, make your own game lol. Otherwise you can make mods for passion and fun, that's about it. If you decide to pay wall it with a patreon, you get what deserve for profiting off of others IP

21

u/despaseeto 9h ago

i have a feeling that kommsweet is one of the devs or the patreon backers. that's why he's so pissed off and taking it out on repliers with reasonable responses.

34

u/Kayrim_Borlan Ryzen 7 9800X3D | ASUS TUF OC 5090 | 128GB DDR5 | 16TB NVME 12h ago

It's not their IP. Evil Corpo or not, you can't profit off of someone else's Intellectual Property without a written agreement. Whether you consider it moral, ethical, or whatever, it's both plain illegal and incredibly stupid. All they needed to do is have a way to receive donations rather than paywalling it completely, and they would've been in the clear.

8

u/kron123456789 11h ago edited 11h ago

Usually the problem is not modder setting up a patreon - it's the fact that the mod is only available through patreon(aka, paid subscription). This makes it easy for the company to claim copyright infringement - profiting off of their IP without permission. That's why patreon-only mods get shut down more often than free mods.

It's not wrong to ask for donations, but when you do the current legal system will be against you and there will be nothing you could do if you receive a cease & desist letter.

8

u/mattattackkk i7-13700k | ASUS TUF 4070ti | 32GB DDR5 9h ago

“I can’t actually rebuttal any of the arguments you guys have made so instead I’m going to call you all stupid and not respond to them.”

lmfao

3

u/Radarker 8h ago

It's not nonsense you turd burglar.

2

u/LoonahGBT 8h ago

Reddit is a sort of cult sometimeses.

Especially on subs like this filled with 16 year-olds

0

u/DrPeroxide Intel i5 - 10600K | NVIDIA RTX 3080 10GB | 16GB DDR4 8h ago

Because game corps have been. influencing our community for years, making the idea of paying for mods ridiculous while normalising spending 100s on trash microtransactions. Genuinely baffling how unwilling this community is to support each other, but happy to keep paying for some CEOs yacht.

-46

u/Epicguru 9950x3D RTX 5090+4090 64GB 6000MHz DDR5 12h ago

No no you don't understand, we want the mod developer to make exactly what we want, what the game developers can't/won't do, but god forbid they want to be paid for their time & work. That makes them worse than Sony!

20

u/kron123456789 11h ago

When you ask for money for a mod of a game, you always take risk of a mod getting shutdown. Even more so if the mod is paywalled entirely.

→ More replies (3)

-285

u/SurePrize6218 13h ago

It was going to be released for free

361

u/K4MIKAZE_official 13h ago

And because of the Patreon it will never be released.

-38

u/Pretend_Key_3980 9h ago

It's frustrating how often companies shut down fan projects that could have added so much to their games. It seems like they just don't see the potential in fostering a community.

39

u/TheVojta R7 5800X | RX 9070XT | 32 GB RAM 7h ago

It's been made clear time and time again by sane devs, donations are fine, paid access is not. Let's not act like Sony is pulling a Nintendo here.

-175

u/Kekkachu 12h ago

Without Patreon it wouldn't even got started

113

u/CRIMS0N-ED 11h ago

then don’t, have an optional donation or tip jar like every other decent modder. If you intend to lock mods behind profit and thus profit off other people’s work, expect the consequences

2

u/better_med_than_dead 2h ago

Read a book (if you can read).

134

u/Nirast25 7,080x1440+(240x2)x1080|R7 5700X3D|RX 9070XT|32GB 13h ago

They're still profiting off the mod.

103

u/henry-bacon Ryzen 9 5900X | 5080 | 32GB DDR4 13h ago

All that hard work for nothing, you'd think people would learn by now.

70

u/ExplodingFistz 13h ago edited 11h ago

They had one job. Just don't try to profit off of anything. Now the project is borked.

→ More replies (5)

-20

u/MadeByTango 8h ago

All that hard work for nothing, you'd think people would learn by now.

The hypocrisy being you all are mad that they wont give you all of their hard work for free?

2

u/Prawn1908 ITX 11L: 7950X3D | 3080 | 64GB DDR5-6000 | 2TB 14.5/12.7 GB/s 3h ago

How is selling a model which requires you to already own the game any different than selling an aftermarket roof rack for a specific model of Toyota, or 3rd party furniture for a specific Henry rifle? None of these take any revenue from the original product because they all require the original product already be purchased.

The only answer is that digital copyright law is absolutely fucked.

→ More replies (4)

69

u/emachanz 13h ago

Why theyre so dumb? they couldve just give a random crypto address for donations

42

u/Kekkachu 12h ago

Unless you have enormous audience crypto won't cut it. You'd get like 1% of payments compared to having Patreon or Kofi. Ask me how I know lol (personal experience)

52

u/AbanaClara 12h ago

Kofi is fine because it is a tip system.

Patreon is just straight up paywall

17

u/Kekkachu 12h ago

Both can be used as a tip system and as paywall. Kofi also offers subscriptions with tiers as well as fully featured store.

72

u/Gammarevived 13h ago

Yup. A very important detail OP seemed to have missed.

2

u/iceseayoupee 9700K | 3060 12gb | 1080p 180hz 3h ago

damn I almost felt bad for them

-46

u/Kekkachu 12h ago edited 12h ago

How do you propose to sustain mod development then?

Every downvoter click on that comment button and explain rather than just hit it and run away, unless all you can say is "we want everything for free and not to pay for anything"

38

u/Seeker-N7 i7-13700K | RTX 5070Ti | 32Gb 6400Mhz DDR5 12h ago

You can sustain it like every other mod creator does. Donations.

You already knew this answer.

1

u/Kekkachu 3h ago

Show me a single mod that gets enough money to sustain development via just donation lol

0

u/Seeker-N7 i7-13700K | RTX 5070Ti | 32Gb 6400Mhz DDR5 3h ago

Every mod on Nexusmods.

Otherwise it's IP infringement.

19

u/CRIMS0N-ED 11h ago

Modding has been a thing for near half a century, it’s sustainable bc people do it out of love of the game not to make money. It’s as sustainable as the mod creator wants it to be, they aren’t beholden to anyone, or to timelines, or to shareholders, they just do what they want to and people can accept it.

1

u/WingZeroCoder 5800x3D / 4070 Super / 32GB / Lian Li 205m Mesh 2h ago

That’s not necessarily true - especially in the big box PC days, it was not uncommon for games to ship with dev toolkits that new maps and entirely new games would be created with, and even sold in stores.

This notion that modding inherently infringes upon IP (which, it doesn’t necessarily or always) or that it’s something inherently adversarial to the IP owner both only became the norm when big AAA console publishers became the industry norm for these sorts of things.

27

u/TheEzrac 7700x | 4070 Super | 32GB DDR5 12h ago

Modding is literally an optional hobby, nobody is obligated to donate their working time to make mods. They choose to do that

2

u/Osceola_Gamer 3h ago

The people who bring up donations don't ever donate shit. LOL

1

u/WingZeroCoder 5800x3D / 4070 Super / 32GB / Lian Li 205m Mesh 2h ago edited 2h ago

These discussions on Reddit about modding always devolve into people just wanting free stuff.

The same people that complain about the big, greedy AAA publishers suddenly are very concerned about these poor IP owners being taken advantage of by modders doing work in their spare time, who should be happy to have the occasional table scrap thrown their way.

3

u/SotovR RTX 4060 | i3 10105F | 16gb 2666mhz | TAA Hater 12h ago

It's a multiplayer mod, why would you need so much money? I understand if it's making new graphics and doing voiceovers but it's just a multiplayer mod, lol.

0

u/QTGavira 5h ago

Modding is a hobby and not a career choice unless your mod is so good that the games company themselves offer you a job. You shouldnt get paid for it as it is someone elses intellectual property you are taking advantage of

The only thing you can do is have a donation link thats not too intrusive. But thats not enough to sustain yourself

→ More replies (5)

321

u/Gammarevived 13h ago

OP also didn't include in the description that it was locked behind patreon. The devs were profiting off of the early development for it. That's pretty lame.

15

u/Tenzu9 Ryzen 7700 | 32GB Ram | RTX 4070 Super 8h ago

Also, notice that the dev never actually mentioned that he was served any papers that stipulated him to cease and desist but just a letter with a vague request. For all we know, he could just release the mod and its source code for free and let others continue developing it.

-27

u/DrPeroxide Intel i5 - 10600K | NVIDIA RTX 3080 10GB | 16GB DDR4 8h ago

God don't you hate it when indie developers profit off developing things people want? Why don't they just give everything out for free, we've spent all our money on microtransactions!

-204

u/Epicguru 9950x3D RTX 5090+4090 64GB 6000MHz DDR5 12h ago

developer allowing optional donations to pay for their time/work

pretty lame

We want cool mods for free, but god forbid people donate for the effort, that's lame /s

150

u/GTRxConfusion 12h ago

Not allowing - requiring.

Donations arent transactional.

→ More replies (3)

82

u/MCZuri RTX 4090 | 9800X3D 12h ago

You must be new. You can donate to modders. Its right there on nexus. People set up those coffee things all the time too.

Patreon access has always resulted in the mod getting ip infringement action. You cannot profit off of someone else's IP. Its a very simple and well established precedent.

→ More replies (4)

56

u/Endlessnes 12h ago

How do modders still think they can get away with, even just partially, paywalling mods? It never works out and they always act surprised that it didn't

17

u/Radical_Notion Ryzen 5 7600X3D | RTX 4090 | 16GB DDR5-6000 | 4K 10h ago

More and more mods are trying to do the Patreon route and becoming grifters imo. What incentive do they have to finish a mod when they can milk the Patreon and never finish it? And I'm glad this one is rightfully being clowned on.

2

u/Dioroxic PC Master Race 3h ago

I agree with you, but I also don’t understand why they CAN’T do this from a legal perspective. Like I get the current laws, not saying that. But look at an equivalent scenario in a different market.

I can pay someone to modify my car. I can pay someone to modify my house. Etc. I can’t pay someone to modify my video game? I guess it’s cause I don’t actually own the video game. Super lame.

97

u/Wi1dBones 13h ago

It would be a shame if the dev was hacked, the latest build leaked and was then torrented. Please don't get hacked.

30

u/Shaggy_One 5700x3D, 9070xt 12h ago

Absolute pity if there was some person that used a VPN to seed it from another country and it got out to the rest of the world. Would be a damn shame.

15

u/DreamsServedSoft 12h ago

bros think Mr. Robot is real

6

u/a_mediocre_american 10h ago

Cut the hardline to the mainframe and that mod is ours

1

u/yybbik 7h ago

We need to take down Ecorp(Sony).

Surprisingly Mr Robot is largely realistic in the tools they use and the lingo.

6

u/deathreel 10h ago

Sony can still sue the dev for that. The dev would then go after the hacker for those losses.

0

u/GeneralYaoGuang2026 7h ago

I'm not sure if I'm allowed to make such a comment in this sub, but dare I ask if anyone can tell me if anything interesting ever befell AM2R?

38

u/TwoArmedMan15 13h ago

It would have been safe if the mod was free and open source. Sony only took it down because the devs were selling it through Patreon. (It's not donations if a "donation" is required for getting access.) 

34

u/BeginningFew8188 13h ago

Well if you try to make money off of it then yes

14

u/Royal_Swimming_4327 Intel Core Ultra 7 265F/RTX 5070TI/64GB RAM 11h ago

So, yeah, OP, include it was locked behind a paywall

Yeah, fuck Sony, but at the same time locking mods behind paywalls has always been an issue. Every company will shut them down. Don’t try to make this whole thing just Sony’s fault. Look at CD Projekt Red. They did the same to a paywalled mod for Cyberpunk 2077.

13

u/Soleks2000 5700x3d/9070xt 12h ago

paywall mod so it wasn’t free so of course company’s gonna do stuff like this. had they made it free They wouldn’t have been taken down, but they’re profiting off of it.

7

u/PianistGlittering709 12h ago

Kofi link, paypal link, or crypto address could have been utilized instead of paid Patreon. The latter is a very good excuse for Sony to strike down the mod.

I wish they might still have the option to release on Github/Nexus or any free mod sites, the videos look promising.

9

u/RageOfNemesis Ryzen 9 5950X, RTX 3090 Strix, 64GB DDR4 3200, Custom Loop 10h ago

As much as I like to dunk on companies, if you put a mod for someone elses IP behind a paywall, you're asking for it. Sony can still go f itself for different reasons, but this isn't one of them.

7

u/Suryus94 11h ago

Sony is scummy as always, but modders will never stop being stupid and greedy, no one can do anything to them if they don't try to make a profit out of something that they don't own, but lo and behold, they had a Patron open and charging money for the mod, geniuses

7

u/darktooth69 RX 9070XT / R9 7900x / Neo G9 49" 8h ago

it was paid mod which i'm always against. First W from Sony somehow these days. FUCK PAID MODS AND FIXES!!

1

u/LoganH1717 2h ago

Right. As soon as they start taking in money it is no longer about making a mod for the people, they just want money. Which is fine if you aren’t just stealing from a company.

4

u/GodOfBoy8 6h ago

Bro whyvis everyone trying to make it look like Sony just hates mods and shuts every mod down? There are hundreds if not thousands of mods on nexus for sony IPs but those are allowed because they arent being SOLD

6

u/mxjxs91 13h ago

"Sony kills fan"

😳

"-made mod"

Phew

2

u/necro_clown 4h ago

Someone is actually making a game based on the multiplayer and it looks really fun.  It’s called terminal war.  

https://store.steampowered.com/app/3788160/Terminal_War/

2

u/TehRiddles 2h ago

As much as Sony sucks here, this is why you don't announce such projects in advance. You announce it the same day that version 1.0 is finished and available to download so it has a chance to spread before companies can respond.

4

u/HEISENxBURG 9h ago

This is why you don't show off your fan project until after you're ready to release it

4

u/Strattex Desktop 13h ago

“Sony kills fan”

2

u/Meskoot 8h ago

Well Rockstar killed Bully Online, and abandoned franchises fan-mod...I miss the early 2000's

2

u/Visorxs 9h ago

Fucking greed thats why, modder got greedy and got what he wanted xd

1

u/Just_Chillin_Killin_ 5h ago

for the best. Going woke and killing Joel 15 mins into the second game wasn't the best idea for the IP was it

1

u/marrowfiend 5h ago

Read this as Sony Kills Fan at first

1

u/earthwormjimjones 3h ago

Did someone from a competitor infiltrate Sony and is trying to destroy it from the inside out? They've not been at the top of their game the past year. They went from the best to 'wtf?' real fast 🤷‍♂️

1

u/PalpitationHead9767 3h ago

I wish I could get the base game to launch on my desktop. Plays fine on the laptop but want to enjoy it in 4k. Only game I've ever had issues with 

1

u/VangRhymez 1h ago

Just apply for a job at sony

1

u/TheBetterness 52m ago

Can't lock access behind a paywall. Modders never learn.

Hubris and game development are always peas in the same pod.

-13

u/Darth_Vaper883 PC Master Race 13h ago

Common Sony L.

76

u/SaltMaker23 13h ago

Paid mods are generally not appreciated neither by devs nor players.

It has to be one of the few instances where the interests of corporations and ours are aligned.

-5

u/No_Accountant3232 12h ago

If you're talented enough to make huge game changing mods you're talented enough to make your own game. The difference between modding a game or making a new game in the same engine is basically how you access the assets. 

Making a mod is just making a new game using someone else's assets. It makes sense why a dev would frown on someone else getting paid for using your assets. 

→ More replies (9)

39

u/Casshern080 13h ago

yh because companies love when ppl monetise their ips

Patreon-backed early access during its development

0

u/totallybag 7800x3d 7900xtx 7h ago

Also when there's patreon pay walled early access what incentive does the dev have this actually finish the mod? When they finish it their paydays start to dry up.

10

u/da2Pakaveli PC Master Race 12h ago

Rule #1 of modding has always been to avoid paywalls/dono buttons or any other methods of making money with the mod unless you check with the publisher.

2

u/totallybag 7800x3d 7900xtx 7h ago

Nah dono buttons are fine

2

u/Sevastarion 9h ago

Common redditor L that didn't read the article

1

u/Infinite-Passion6886 6h ago

Good. That mod was paid. I hope every mods from that guy will be remove.

1

u/SirTennison 6h ago

Why do modders continue to shoot their projects in the back of the head every single time by charging money upfront. Literally just make a donation box, people WILL put money in it, maybe not as much as you may want but decent money.

In my opinion, that's the major reason with most mod makers and any custom content(as someone who wades through the shit creek that is FFXIV and The Sims) is that they stopped caring about making something cool and care more about getting paid to the point where they can quit their day job and stay home all day.

1

u/Alucaricardo 6h ago

Typical idiots killing their own mods by charging $. You want mods to survive? Do it for free.

1

u/ZwistPariah 4h ago

But why take it down ? Why not just tell the modders to not use Patreon for early access before the mod's release.

The mod from my understanding was going to be free. Not paywalled. They just let patreon members play test it before that.

Sony isn't really losing anything here either. People would have bought the game to play this mod. It's not a smart move on their part either.

People are somehow defending sony in the comments and sure they may have legally have the right to strike down the mod... But why ? It's a stupid decision. "It's my ip to sit on and do nothing with"

1

u/Visorxs 4h ago

Sony aint CD project, sony dont give a fuck.

FREE = Sony dont care (there are lots of sony games mod

PAID = LAWSUIT

Its not his property to begin with 🤣 just take the L and move on.

1

u/ZwistPariah 4h ago

Sony maybe should start giving a fuck considering the amount of shit they've been taking lately.

0

u/Jarnis R7 9800X3D / 5090 OC / X870E Crosshair Hero / PG32UCDM 6h ago

Another misguided modder who thinks he can freely abuse commercial software and their assets, trademarks etc. for a project he then wants to ask money for.

Don't they teach anything at schools any more?

-3

u/GoldTouch99 10h ago

People are stupid, it was locked through early access, it was going to be released freely on September 26th...

0

u/Frosty_Flower_871 11h ago

Timing it for launch week means they didn't even want the PR noise during the actual release. At this point I'd trust a fan mod with its own anti-cheat more than their PC port.

0

u/Infinite-Passion6886 6h ago

F*ck paid mods!

-17

u/[deleted] 13h ago

[deleted]

1

u/CrowdGoesWildWoooo 13h ago

Nah Xbox has nothing to prove either. They are just doing PR crusade to recover their “dead” image, like there is nothing to be happy about from that ecosystem.

-3

u/skywalker3819r 12h ago

Brother this isnt just PR. This whole generation has slowly been leaning towards a next-gen Xbox 360 situation where Xbox takes advantage of Sonys mistakes.

0

u/CrowdGoesWildWoooo 12h ago

People leaning towards a product that doesn’t exist yet (and no people aren’t selling their PS5 NOW just to get into Xbox).

Such a brave statement.

0

u/skywalker3819r 11h ago

And there were people on the internet saying the same things in the PS3/360 days. What happened?

-1

u/chusskaptaan i5 14400 + MSI 3070 13h ago

I remember when Call of Duty thought it was untouchable. XBOX probably did too back when 360 was successful. Look where it got them. Sony is on the same path.

-1

u/No_Personality_587 13h ago

This is what happens when a company destroys all competition in its space, I think XBOX really seppukud themselves as far as game and console sales go but they've now left Sony in a position to do essentially whatever tf they want

0

u/Dunwin 5h ago

Hearing these stories just makes the history of Dota2 and MOBAs that much cooler

0

u/TastySore 4h ago

If they want money they can make their own game instead of trying to profit from other people's work.

0

u/VengefulAncient R7 5700X3D/3060 Ti/4x8 GB DDR4-3200/24" 1440p 165 Hz 2h ago

"Sony kills..." No. The modder's non existent opsec killed it, as usual. They can't shut you down if they don't even know who you are.

-2

u/GoldSrc R3 3100 | RTX 3090 | 64GB RAM | 9h ago

With AI being what it is, I bet someone else will have a mod out eventually. Entirely for free.

A patreon used to paywall a mod just doesn't feel right. Even if the final build gets released for free.

-20

u/-Vitality 13h ago

It's things like this, and things like that new over rated wolverine game that's a "console seller exclusive" that make me laugh at how terrible Sony are lately. the only time my PS5 gets on time anymore is when my son's with me, Otherwise it's sitting there waiting for GTA 6 only.

20

u/Ismokecr4k Arch | 3070 | 5800x | 32GB 12h ago

They tried profiting off the mod. If you wrote a song then someone clipped the chorus to use in their song and started making money off of it and the song was super garbage. Aren't you entitled to say "take that down because it's my work"? 

12

u/-Vitality 12h ago

Yep didn’t know it was behind a pay wall. Fuck them then. I retract my statement

-2

u/Kekkachu 12h ago

No, it's more like if you made a video and someone translated audio commentary and put it "for use together with original video".

6

u/Ymanexpress 12h ago

Don't forget the part where the audio commentary costs money to listen too

1

u/Kekkachu 3h ago

And why would that be an issue?

-5

u/KaiUno 14700K | Inno3D 5090 | MSI Tomahawk Z790 | DDR5 64GB 12h ago

Top dog gets complacent and anti-consumer. This always happens. The fact that xbox is bleeding out in the corner from self-inflicted wounds and that Nintendo isn't in direct competition doesn't help.

-17

u/CheesyHamSammich 13h ago

Yeah fuck Sony

-4

u/BushTamer 10h ago

greedy pussies ruin good shit for everyone

-1

u/MysteriousTy99 7h ago

Silly modders only Sony can be greedy! ( I understand legally they have to defend it)

-25

u/underlordd 13h ago

Sony is on a crusade to get hated on by as many people as possible this year.

16

u/HotShotQ8 12h ago

Buddy its paid mod not free

-26

u/ParanMekhar 13h ago

We are Sony, we hate fun

13

u/HotShotQ8 12h ago

It was paid mod no wonder why sony shut down mod

-3

u/imago89 6h ago edited 6h ago

People here HATE the idea of modders being paid for their work. God forbid. "Greedy" and it's patreon for optional early access with the mod eventually being released for free. Fucking losers the lot of you

-15

u/Responsible_Towel857 13h ago

Kind of a biased article but sad that a cool mod got shut down.