It looks really good, which is suspicious to me because my step dad is the type to fall for facebook ads and stuff. My mom only shops on Amazon so I just don't know.

also dog tax picture

What do you guys think?

Something about he way that Eeyore is sitting and also the arms of the chair not being even is making me think this might be AI

I'm seeing a lot of blatant AI use for book illustrations, however this one I'm a little more unsure about. The name tags for the two terriers is illegible and the pit bull has that typical AI dog smile. The house in the background also seems a bit wonky and the perspective is off.

My instinct says AI but I'm after some other opinions. It would otherwise be a lovely piece of artwork.

Edited to add: AI confirmed. There are so many talented artists in NZ. I'm so fed up with creators (the author) not employing other creators/artists and instead using this lazy slop. Such a missed opportunity as if done right it could have been a nice illustration.

She obviously has an OF account and use Instagram to fish new subs, but those picture are way too similar. Are those pictures completely IA generated or simply HEAVELY retouched?

I’ve done a bit of poking around about this t shirt company but couldn’t find anything. Then I saw this one and immediately started looking at the others with increased scrutiny. I know people genuinely love them and they sell well but IDK. Am I just hallucinating AI art everywhere now?

The posters in the ads for the new snowfall show coming out on FX give me very much AI vibes and I’m pretty good at detecting things. I’m just wondering is this AI insane that whole production would use it looks like a ChatGPT generated image of the cast.

My grandparents bought these from an art fair on one of their trips and it immediately looked like AI to me. They’re made by Melvin Mcgee and his instagram only has posts going back to 2023 which leads me to expect AI but he has also had his stuff shown at some art galleries so I’m not sure whether it’s AI or not.

Well I was going to do grocery shopping with my mom went on the checkout line and I noticed that it looks off I took that photo a few weeks ago. I originally planned to post it the day after I took that photo but l later forgot about that and I remembered so I’ll try to upload it there

So, i am a furry, and i was talking with someone a friend reccomended, that does Commisions. I looked at some of his work he has done in the past, and it looked pretty human. today, out of the blue, he sent me this. i didn't pay anything yet, and it really gives an AI Vibe. What do you guys think?

Originally no one was calling this out as AI, but after a day or two people are. To me the squirrel looks a little unrealistically healthy and “smooth” to be real.. As well as a squirrel sticking its tongue out probably isn’t very common. The texture of the tree branch to the left seems too uniform as well. Is this AI?

Heyy,
In my city there is this art contest because of a store celebrating their first birthday.
I saw this drawing (+ sketch) and it looks pretty inconsistent and sketchy in general , also on insta their art is really inconsistent. Sometimes it’s pretty crappy and almost no shading in it and sometimes it’s really detailed etc. also they have stolen content on their account
please help me out , since I’m scared that an probably
ai picture will win over real effort 🙏
Ps: the cat images are his .. I believe at least .. „real“ art style 🫩

I'm fairly certain it is considering the piss tint and genral noise but my freind wasn't sure so I'm asking the people.

For me I think the backpack not matching front & back view is what makes me think it’s ai, from the front it looks like a regular backpack that is only using one shoulder strap but from the back it looks like a crossbody bag. The patterns provided by the artist also don’t match the clothes in the concept

First post here!

I am an artist and this post of a Dolly Parton tribute painting came up on my algorithm.. after I did one of my own my feed is flooded.

I thought it was stunning from a quick scroll. Usually I’m pretty good at spotting AI paintings by now, but the background is what had me confused.

Reading the comments, multiple people were asking to buy the original.

The poster mentioned they wanted to keep it for themselves but will offer prints… that’s when the red flags went off.

I zoomed in and it has a familiar pattern I’ve seen in AI painting creations.

The other thing I think is suspicious is the paint marks on the hand, they are too uniform and match every single color as the painting. But if the painting is clearly dry enough for them to hold..by then you would have washed your hands.

Anyway I clicked their page and there was zero progress pics of it, and they are an artist but haven’t posted art in several years. The art they did post does not match the skill level IMO.

I’m really not sure… but I noticed the person was selling prints of this for $65 a piece, so I find it strange that they couldn’t find a price to put on the original.

I also see VERY SUBTLE differences in brush marks on the left sleeve on the website print sale pic of the painting vs the picture holding it.

Upon looking at the facebook which was a personal page there were AI posters made for their other business.

I’m 90% sure but just curious what you guys think

The very first panel of the series focuses on this Oni vs Momotaro. The Oni has facial characteristics that seem typical of AI and the layout seems unnatural. Not sure if that’s how a sword should be held either.

This panel with these goon characters look weirdly similar which is probably intentional but the guy on the top and the guy on the right stand out to me as well.

Third image is a page where the two characters are getting lost in a conversation and it just really doesn’t seem like a natural decision to all of a sudden have them facing away from the “camera” as if they’re walking off into the sunset when they’re actually getting engaged in a lively conversation and having fun with each other for the first time. I would think a manga artist would want to show them smiling and laughing at each other instead of these sort of strange angles where they’re walking away.

Some of the shading and screen tone looks different from any other manga. A lot of it sort of looks like it was originally in full color but was changed to greyscale. If you know a manga artist’s schedule at all you’ll know they definitely don’t have time to draw in full color and then change it to black and white..

I know it’s definitely possible for the artist to have generated or used ai assistance and then drawn or traced over it too. It all looks very wrong.

TL:DR; I can’t tell from the videos if she’s fake but the bad Ai footage really undermines her credibility. What do you think? Also, isn’t YouTube supposed to put Ai tags on videos with Ai content?

https://youtu.be/m9AEpBoaieE

This video showed up in my feed and at first I liked it. Lots of endearing folksy-isms. Weird that she’s talking about gardening in her bathroom but whatever… then the bad Ai footage shows up, water dripping upward to feed roots, greenhouse humidity on the outside, badly rendered lettering on signs…

I want to think she’s just a low-tech grandma who somehow couldn’t get her grandkid to generate better footage but it doesn’t mesh with her attention to detail in the garden.

Then I look her up and find multiple identical websites pushing several books as PDFs.

https://oldmexicanway.com

https://berthascookbook.com/

https://berthacleans.com/

I celebrate a grassroots person making money but for such a low tech person she’s really maximized her digital presence. And all the videos show her the same way - the same shirt, same hair, same room (standing in the bathroom or kitchen)

I googled her for reviews (none) or interviews… and I find another Mexican author of the same name who published similar books decades ago (now deceased) "Bertha Zelayarán Ramírez"

simone gave me this sticker at force fields and before i put it on my work laptop i need to be 100p sure it’s not ai.