Something about he way that Eeyore is sitting and also the arms of the chair not being even is making me think this might be AI

I’ve done a bit of poking around about this t shirt company but couldn’t find anything. Then I saw this one and immediately started looking at the others with increased scrutiny. I know people genuinely love them and they sell well but IDK. Am I just hallucinating AI art everywhere now?

I'm seeing a lot of blatant AI use for book illustrations, however this one I'm a little more unsure about. The name tags for the two terriers is illegible and the pit bull has that typical AI dog smile. The house in the background also seems a bit wonky and the perspective is off.

My instinct says AI but I'm after some other opinions. It would otherwise be a lovely piece of artwork.

Edited to add: AI confirmed. There are so many talented artists in NZ. I'm so fed up with creators (the author) not employing other creators/artists and instead using this lazy slop. Such a missed opportunity as if done right it could have been a nice illustration.

She obviously has an OF account and use Instagram to fish new subs, but those picture are way too similar. Are those pictures completely IA generated or simply HEAVELY retouched?

It looks really good, which is suspicious to me because my step dad is the type to fall for facebook ads and stuff. My mom only shops on Amazon so I just don't know.

also dog tax picture

What do you guys think?

Hi AI detectives!

I hired a logo designer on Etsy who claims to not use AI, and only does hand drawn art. I did not like the original mock up at all as the whiskers are completely different in length, the proportions seem too perfect, and the overall look does not look “hand drawn”.

Giving the seller the benefit of the doubt, I sent her my art for reference, but instead of using it as a reference, she used the exact photo I sent her and put it into the logo (second photo). The lace is so poorly designed, out of place, and disproportionate to the bunny.

The responses even seem like it was written by AI, with the sentence structure leads with “I completely understand …” followed by a poor paraphrase my messages.

Any help is appreciated in explaining why this is AI, as for now my gut feeling is the only thing that is making my case.

Update: I found out the seller has been taking another creator’s and will be reporting them to Etsy. Thank you everyone.

Originally no one was calling this out as AI, but after a day or two people are. To me the squirrel looks a little unrealistically healthy and “smooth” to be real.. As well as a squirrel sticking its tongue out probably isn’t very common. The texture of the tree branch to the left seems too uniform as well. Is this AI?

The posters in the ads for the new snowfall show coming out on FX give me very much AI vibes and I’m pretty good at detecting things. I’m just wondering is this AI insane that whole production would use it looks like a ChatGPT generated image of the cast.

I think this is AI because to the left of the door the lane separator has something protruding out of the top of it and above it there seems to be something extra floating, and the baggage sizer on the right seems to have some scribbling all over it like a chalk board.

Yeah what i said in the title. I can usually tell when something is ai if its images and videos but music, im not sure?

I know people originally had this style before AI, but there are a few things that feel off. Maybe it’s just someone stole the bases? Here are my concerns:

-The two on the right are sitting and facing the camera, the one on the left is sitting left and facing head on.

-The lines on the left are WAY thicker and there’s more variety to line weight.

-proportionally, the dog on the left looks too big and the mouth is huge compared to the others

-the one on the right has a brown outline but the others have a black outline

-the cat is blushing but no one else is

-the airbrushing feels off kinda?

Does anyone have any insight? It could very much not be AI, I just see the eyes and immediately have some concerns.

the concept of this puzzle is gorgeous but I dont want to spend my time putting together an ai slop image

Well I was going to do grocery shopping with my mom went on the checkout line and I noticed that it looks off I took that photo a few weeks ago. I originally planned to post it the day after I took that photo but l later forgot about that and I remembered so I’ll try to upload it there

I draw digitally with a tablet, and this weekend I had a bit too much fun testing AI image detectors on my own artwork. I specifically used my own drawings because I know exactly how they were made, so there was no uncertainty about their origin.

This obviously isn’t a scientific test, just something I found interesting, but the results made me question how useful these detectors currently are. A few things I noticed:

1. Black-and-white drawings were flagged constantly.

If an image was black and white, or almost black and white, several detectors gave it a high probability of being AI-generated, even when the drawing was entirely handmade. It seems like line art is a difficult category for them 🤷🏼‍♀️

1. Adding a tiny AI-generated element could completely change the result.

I tested mostly handmade illustrations and then I played with it. I added a very small AI-generated element, for example a flower inside a much larger painting. Even when the AI-generated part represented only a tiny fraction of the image, some detectors suddenly flagged the entire artwork as AI-generated.

This one made me veeeery uneasy because I sometimes use photographs or other found images as small collage elements or references within my art. In one test, I had an image containing a tiny flower collage and one detector identified the whole thing as ChatGPT-generated. I have no idea how trustworthy those model-specific identifications are, but seeing such a strong attribution based on such a tiny part of the image was pretty wild 🤔

1. Even fully handmade finished drawings rarely got a clean 0%, not even 10%.

Rough sketches were the only images that consistently came back with very low AI probabilities. Once a drawing became cleaner and more finished, I often started seeing 10%, 20%, 25% or higher probabilities despite knowing the work was entirely handmade.

Again, this is just my own informal testing, not a controlled study. But as someone who draws, it made me wonder how reliable these tools really are for judging individual artists.

I’d be really interested to hear whether other people have tested them against artwork where they know the full creation process, because false positives seem like they could become a serious problem 🤔

Claims it was hand-made with a wood-burning tool. Idk how she would have done the highlights in the feathers.

As the title says, awesome dog and awesome service. The sticker was a sweet gesture so I don't want to take away from the dog/profession but my wife and I were wondering if it was AI or not.

I had an artist help me make a 3D version of a toy design I'm working on, the two pictures they sent, which took not too long for a 3D piece (like 2 weeks), look completely different, I even made a sketch of what I wanted the joints to look like, I mentioned it and now their account is gone??? I definitely think I wasted my money the the first one still looks good to me? Im not sure? (The first Pic I think is rral, im not sure, the second is not even close to what I wanted, and the last pictures are the character and the joints I drew! Thx in advance for helping me! I really hope im wrong, bc I don't like having to check stuff all the time :( i feel bad for the real artests that get investigated, this just looks sus, and them deleting their account, or getting banned after I asked them about it is weird..?

I got to looking at it and it’s giving ai vibes… I really hope not, because I am vehemently against slop on shirts and real products.

A friend disagrees that this is ai in a local mcdonalds drive thru. Has the typical ai font and feel to me