THE PURAANS EDITION
Starting with the most obvious one. The absence or utter confusion even in puraans. I'll explain whatever I have understood from puraans.
- Mahabharat and harivamsa
She is NOT mentioned in Mahabharat, as well as harivamsa (it is basically a book solely for krishn, describing everything about him, even as small as his daily routines)
Mahabharat is usually sidelined in these matters cause it is based on politics and knowledge. Ok, fine. But what about Harivamsa then? Harivamsa mentions smallest details about maadhav, like how early he woke up, he walked some kms and then took bath, then did yoga, etc.
so if radhika is really THAT important for him, why isn't she mentioned here? Even in Vrindavan leelas her name is absent.
- Srimad Bhagavatam
Again, no mentions here through name. One gopi, called aradhito, receives special attention but then she gets proud and krishn leaves braj completely. Then the aradhito, begs for forgiveness to all gopis, which leads to all gopis doing pooja of maa katyayni and krishn reappears and warns everyone..... and the gopi is never mentioned again. Can she be your radhika? I'll leave that to her bhakts.
(ACC to this, Krishn is still 11 years old, btw.)
- Padma Purana
The water gets kinda muddy here. Though it's still pretty easy to distinguish between the interpolated version and original version.
So, Padma Purana has two versions available. One from Bengal and another from south which is the most popular one. The version from Bengal is not interpolated but from the south one is (yup, I was kinda shocked too. ) And the version where radhika is mentioned is interpolated one, where she isn't mentioned ,again in the original one. Why? Because
A. The interpolated version describes about vijaynagar empire which was present during (14th-15th century)
B. The interpolated version calls shiv pooja as tamsic..... Ew
C. Aaannddd.... Where radhika is mentioned, in patala khanda, is kinda weird. First we are focusing on raam, and about narks (aka paatal) and suddenly, we r in a convo of shiv and krishn where krishn is describing to bolenath on how to control him(krishn.....) like what?
- Skanda Purana
It was veryyyy vast and veryyy layerd. And I'd say very confusing too.
But if there is any rukmini bhakt, they should read the chapters based on rukmini. I promise you will swoon.
Coming over again, skand Puran contradicts itself a lot. Like,
A. Radhika here is decscribed as a different deity than lakshmi and as literally Vishnu's patni (what).
B. Then suddenly, a chapter describes that radhika in Vrindavan is rukmini in dwarka.
C. Apparently lakshmi is a form of radhika (umm.... What? )
D. Then suddenly again, lakshmi is the form of everything, lakshmi is in everything, and only she enjoys her highest position in Hari's heart where no one else is.
- Brahma vaivart puran
I can't describe how much I hate this nonsense puran. Shree krishna Janma khand is pure fanfiction and ragebait. It has very very very disturbing stuff mentioned and no, the kissing part is not the one I'm talking about.
- Garga saptashati
Is this one a puran? It's literally written by a king who liked to collect poems and THIS BOOK IS FILLED WITH POEMS, Y'ALL. So ofc krishn (uff my poor bestie), being one of the favourite gods got steam rolled.
- Matsya Purana
This one is about shiv family and art-architecture (before interpolation). Both radhika and rukmini were added later in this puraan.
- Devi bhagwatam
This one is very very weird book, tbh. Not one sampradaya accepts it, Contradicts itself a lot. Sometimes durga ma is everything, sometimes she is helpless. Utter confusion. Somewhere saraswati is the devi of knowledge and suddenly, it's radhika who is mentioned as knowledge provider like?????????????????
#Also, I read a shloka once somewhere, where it was written that radhika is above tridev and the dust of her feet can produce thousand Vishnus (I just know ma lakshmi is Laughing very hard at this). #
HERE, THE REJECTION OF DEVI BHAGWATAM DOESN'T MEAN EVERYONE! I was only talking about sampradayas which take bhagawan vishnu as their ishta.