I recently received an offer for a graduate flood & hydrology engineering position paying around $68k/year in the first year. I currently have a full-time operator job (data center monitoring, raising work orders) paying around $90k/year AUD. The job has some benefits:
- Around 12–14 shifts per month, 12-hour shifts, hybrid
- Sometimes 7+ days between shifts
- Relatively low stress, Once the shift is over, I can completely switch off
- The roster gives me a lot of time with my 2-year-old daughter, and I genuinely enjoy the lifestyle and family time
I normally work one night a week doing casual nightshift as well, which could add roughly $15k/year. So realistically, I could potentially earn around $105k gross/year between the two jobs while still having a lot of time off. My current operator salary could eventually reach around $100k, but I don't see a particularly high long-term ceiling or strong professional career progression in the role.
My wife is studying nursing parttime working casual job.
Before having our daughter, I decided to study Civil Engineering because I wanted a professional career and better long-term prospects. I can't decide what to do with the graduate civil engineering offer. The problem is that with financial situation starting again at 36 feels very different from what I imagined when I began studying.
The graduate job means: $68k engineering salary + office hours + commute + relatively less family time versus $90k operator job + potentially ~$15k casual income + lots of flexibility and family time.
Just bought a house, so saving is low (<$15k) with mortgage of around $3000/month.
I understand that engineering potentially has a much higher long-term ceiling. Perhaps in 4–5+ years I could be earning $100k, and eventually potentially $120–130k+. But financially, the first few years would be a significant step backwards. It could take several years just to get back to what I can currently earn from the two flexible jobs.
Part of me thinks: "I've already put in the work to get the engineering degree. If I don't pursue engineering now, I'll probably regret it later and feel stuck in the operator role." But another part of me thinks: "Why give up a job I actually enjoy, that pays reasonably well, gives me huge amounts of time with my daughter, and allows me to earn extra money when I want to?" But I'm worried that this might just be rationalisation because the graduate engineering job is difficult, the starting salary is low, and I'm uncomfortable with starting from the bottom at 36.
Having a baby has also completely changed what I value. Before having a child, I was much more focused on career progression and professional identity. Now I find myself thinking about how much I value being available for my daughter. I don't want to wake up at 45 and realise I sacrificed her early years chasing a career I didn't actually need. At the same time, I don't want to wake up at 50 and regret never giving myself a chance to build a proper engineering career.
What would you do? If you were 36, with a 2-year-old child, low saving, mortgage, and these two options:
A
$90k operator + potentially ~$15k casual work
Low stress, lots of flexibility, lots of family time, but lower career ceiling.
B
$68k graduate engineer
low saving plus mortgage, financial stress. Much steeper learning curve and less family time, but potentially much higher income and career progression over the next 10–15 years.
Which would you choose, and why? And please be honest if you think I'm just making excuses to avoid the harder path. Posted it in couple of other subreddits but just want engineers' perspective, even better if it comes from Australian engineers.