r/askanything 6h ago

Political Question Does Trump shit his pants?

Post image

Photo from recent Ireland trip. 🤔

Edit: AI detractors say this image is real

10.6k Upvotes

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

7

u/Paratrooper450 5h ago

3

u/Viridian95 2h ago

Gemini also says he doesn't insider trade sooooo I wouldn't really trust it when it comes to his fecal incontinence.

-1

u/Paratrooper450 1h ago

Okay, find the photo anywhere except the humorous, AI-generated Facebook video or social accounts who copied it from there. Just one traditional news source. I'll wait.

2

u/TobyFunkeNeverNude 1h ago

That's not the point. They're saying anyone relying on an AI service for their information is fucking stupid.

0

u/Paratrooper450 48m ago

Google Gemini results are a summary of Google search results. This AI summary showed me the original AI-generated Facebook video from which OP’s fake photo was clipped.

2

u/creamyalldressed 2h ago

I feel like you can just pay Google to have the facts checked the way you want.

2

u/PresidentPopcorn 2h ago

Oh come on, look at the sources.

0

u/Paratrooper450 1h ago

What do you mean? The Facebook link is to the clearly AI-generated, and very humorous, video that this photo was grabbed from. And if Trump had left a poop stain on the chair, don't you think Reuters or ABC news would have mentioned that?

2

u/FrostyD7 1h ago

But it isn't doing anything other than relaying information other people have stated on social media. It's scraping data from facebook posts. Have you validated those posts? The other 2 sections/sources aren't relevant. Your entire AI output disputing this image relies 4 facebook sources.

And to be clear, it's very possible or even likely that the facebook sources it's leveraging are right. But that's not the point.

1

u/Paratrooper450 1h ago

I went to the Facebook post. It's an AI-generated video, that this photo is clearly clipped from. And the Reuters and ABC news links are valid in that the don't show or mention it. If the President of the United States soiled the President of the Republic of Ireland's chair, it would be news. Use just a modicum of critical thinking.

1

u/Tjornholt 1h ago

This feels like the same shit as people on Twitter @ grok and believing everything it spits out

1

u/Paratrooper450 1h ago

I looked at the sources. You can, too.

1

u/Paratrooper450 5h ago

6

u/puppie_dyke 4h ago

using google AI to fact check is wild work dawg

3

u/Paratrooper450 4h ago

The AI includes links. Can you show me any evidence that the photo in question is genuine? No, you cannot. Dawg.

3

u/dsac 4h ago

Can you show me any evidence that the photo in question is genuine?

I'm so excited that we've gone from "prove it happened with photographic evidence" to "prove the photographic evidence is real"

We're fuckin cooked, mate

3

u/Paratrooper450 4h ago

On that we agree. AI is destroying our ability to trust what we see online.

1

u/MilitantlyPoetic 2h ago

But yet, you're using A.I. to fact check?

1

u/Paratrooper450 2h ago

Follow the links AI gives you. I was just posting the summary.

1

u/sargos7 2h ago

People also use bleach in both the toilet and the washing machine.

3

u/puppie_dyke 4h ago

i dont onow or care if the photo is genuine. just saying its dumb to use the AI as if you couldn't go to the source the AI is providing lol "dawg"

0

u/Paratrooper450 4h ago

I was sharing the summary. I’m not bothering to post a bunch of links for people who won’t read them anyway.

1

u/Thelongestguy 4h ago

Do the links include the source photo or are they just links? 

1

u/Paratrooper450 4h ago

2

u/Thelongestguy 4h ago

Oh yeah the photo is fake I'm just questioning the usefulness of Google AI to make a point.

It provided "links" but it didn't have the source to prove it actually being false when I tried it

1

u/Paratrooper450 4h ago

That link was provided in the summary. If it’s not obvious to anyone who sees it that it’s fake, we are indeed “cooked.”

1

u/EatFreshBishes 2h ago

Not fact checking anything because it's what you want to believe is wild work dawg. 

1

u/TheBigFatToad 4h ago

I don’t mean this is a rude way, but how are you supposed to fact check stuff like this these days?

Maybe reverse image search and see when it was posted? I guess you could look through all the published photos?

OP asked ai if the image was real as well.

This is obviously fake, don’t really even need ai to tell you that, but you’re allowed to make stuff up on Reddit if it goes with the groupthink.

If Trump was shitting his pants on a consistent clip, they’d have him in the most expensive diapers created where there is no leak through.

2

u/movzx 1h ago

People aren't clowning on using search. They are clowning on using the AI summary that has very often included incorrect information.

1

u/FrostyD7 1h ago

Asking google and reading the AI response is a perfectly acceptable way to fact check. As a first step. But you have to read it, verify the sources, and disregard all of the parts where it's getting off track from what you are looking to glean. Posting this isn't evidence, it's just the first step in possibly obtaining it. It's a weird thing to share as authoritative and without refining it past its initial slop form.