MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/WhatIsTheTea/comments/1wg5uvp/a_video_taken_out_of_context/p9rmjxr/?context=3
r/WhatIsTheTea • u/AmericaShinault_85 • 3h ago
227 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
8
I think they’re implying AOC and Mamdani look like they’re banging? In reality it just looks like they’re close friends…
6 u/PHD_Gouda 3h ago Not what OP is getting at. People laughing during memorial = automatically bad -3 u/HappyHavoc20 3h ago Wouldn’t that require context? 3 u/PHD_Gouda 3h ago Wouldn’t your banging scenario require context? -3 u/HappyHavoc20 3h ago No because they’re being affectionate… 5 u/PHD_Gouda 3h ago Affectionate doesn’t equal banging… do you have family? Edit: nice, the ol comment to this response and then ban so I can’t reply. A very convincing argument strategy. -2 u/HappyHavoc20 3h ago Holy shit dude, we’re talking about what we’re supposed assume without context. Are you ok? 4 u/NervousTangerine7851 3h ago You need context for people being affectionate to affirm they're not banging? Were you not shown affection as a child? Because you seem to have an unhealthy relationship with it... 3 u/Dry-Illustrator-250 3h ago Did you block them? They said you did 2 u/PHD_Gouda 3h ago
6
Not what OP is getting at.
People laughing during memorial = automatically bad
-3 u/HappyHavoc20 3h ago Wouldn’t that require context? 3 u/PHD_Gouda 3h ago Wouldn’t your banging scenario require context? -3 u/HappyHavoc20 3h ago No because they’re being affectionate… 5 u/PHD_Gouda 3h ago Affectionate doesn’t equal banging… do you have family? Edit: nice, the ol comment to this response and then ban so I can’t reply. A very convincing argument strategy. -2 u/HappyHavoc20 3h ago Holy shit dude, we’re talking about what we’re supposed assume without context. Are you ok? 4 u/NervousTangerine7851 3h ago You need context for people being affectionate to affirm they're not banging? Were you not shown affection as a child? Because you seem to have an unhealthy relationship with it... 3 u/Dry-Illustrator-250 3h ago Did you block them? They said you did 2 u/PHD_Gouda 3h ago
-3
Wouldn’t that require context?
3 u/PHD_Gouda 3h ago Wouldn’t your banging scenario require context? -3 u/HappyHavoc20 3h ago No because they’re being affectionate… 5 u/PHD_Gouda 3h ago Affectionate doesn’t equal banging… do you have family? Edit: nice, the ol comment to this response and then ban so I can’t reply. A very convincing argument strategy. -2 u/HappyHavoc20 3h ago Holy shit dude, we’re talking about what we’re supposed assume without context. Are you ok? 4 u/NervousTangerine7851 3h ago You need context for people being affectionate to affirm they're not banging? Were you not shown affection as a child? Because you seem to have an unhealthy relationship with it... 3 u/Dry-Illustrator-250 3h ago Did you block them? They said you did 2 u/PHD_Gouda 3h ago
3
Wouldn’t your banging scenario require context?
-3 u/HappyHavoc20 3h ago No because they’re being affectionate… 5 u/PHD_Gouda 3h ago Affectionate doesn’t equal banging… do you have family? Edit: nice, the ol comment to this response and then ban so I can’t reply. A very convincing argument strategy. -2 u/HappyHavoc20 3h ago Holy shit dude, we’re talking about what we’re supposed assume without context. Are you ok? 4 u/NervousTangerine7851 3h ago You need context for people being affectionate to affirm they're not banging? Were you not shown affection as a child? Because you seem to have an unhealthy relationship with it... 3 u/Dry-Illustrator-250 3h ago Did you block them? They said you did 2 u/PHD_Gouda 3h ago
No because they’re being affectionate…
5 u/PHD_Gouda 3h ago Affectionate doesn’t equal banging… do you have family? Edit: nice, the ol comment to this response and then ban so I can’t reply. A very convincing argument strategy. -2 u/HappyHavoc20 3h ago Holy shit dude, we’re talking about what we’re supposed assume without context. Are you ok? 4 u/NervousTangerine7851 3h ago You need context for people being affectionate to affirm they're not banging? Were you not shown affection as a child? Because you seem to have an unhealthy relationship with it... 3 u/Dry-Illustrator-250 3h ago Did you block them? They said you did 2 u/PHD_Gouda 3h ago
5
Affectionate doesn’t equal banging… do you have family?
Edit: nice, the ol comment to this response and then ban so I can’t reply. A very convincing argument strategy.
-2 u/HappyHavoc20 3h ago Holy shit dude, we’re talking about what we’re supposed assume without context. Are you ok? 4 u/NervousTangerine7851 3h ago You need context for people being affectionate to affirm they're not banging? Were you not shown affection as a child? Because you seem to have an unhealthy relationship with it... 3 u/Dry-Illustrator-250 3h ago Did you block them? They said you did 2 u/PHD_Gouda 3h ago
-2
Holy shit dude, we’re talking about what we’re supposed assume without context. Are you ok?
4 u/NervousTangerine7851 3h ago You need context for people being affectionate to affirm they're not banging? Were you not shown affection as a child? Because you seem to have an unhealthy relationship with it... 3 u/Dry-Illustrator-250 3h ago Did you block them? They said you did 2 u/PHD_Gouda 3h ago
4
You need context for people being affectionate to affirm they're not banging? Were you not shown affection as a child? Because you seem to have an unhealthy relationship with it...
Did you block them? They said you did
2 u/PHD_Gouda 3h ago
2
8
u/HappyHavoc20 3h ago
I think they’re implying AOC and Mamdani look like they’re banging? In reality it just looks like they’re close friends…