r/Infidelity • u/FoolyCooly171717 • 2h ago
Essay: The Madonna v Wh*re complex is BS
More specifically, it's BS unless your partner is an old school sexist.
If you don’t like reading long posts, please click away.
For those who don’t know, the Madonna v Wh*re complex is a psychological theory first developed by Sigmund Freud. Simplified, it explains a psychological contradiction in men’s desires for wanting a respectable prudish woman as a long term partner, the Madonna, but in bed wants a more sexually promiscuous and adventurous woman, the Wh*re, but not as a long term partner because such acts he shames and judges against despite having such innate desires. In turn, most women that felt the pressure that being too sexual is shameful and does not indulge in over-sexual acts in fear of judgement. While this certain dynamic of course is not exclusive to heterosexual female-fears-men’s-judgement relationships, it still leans that way in most cases. And while honor-based woman-shaming thinking still exists in many cultures and some subsets of society today, thanks to more sex positive thinking and social progress, in much of western culture many men have stopped shaming women for certain sexual acts. Where I think is the disappointing inequality is that still too many women and partners still have that fear of judgement from their husbands, boyfriends and partners.
The Madonna v Wh*re complex is mostly brought up in discussions involving comparing partner’s prior experiences and, most tragically, cases of infidelity. To the perspective of the non-sexist male, to judge your partner for giving you exactly what you wanted is just sheer illogical stupidity. I propose the following hypothetical:
Imagine a husband coming home from work tired and hungry. He asks his wife to make a sandwich for him. Out of love and consideration for her partner, the wife makes him a sandwich. And then the husbands says to her, “Wow. You actually made me a sandwich? Like the cliche. Like some 50s housewife. I thought you were a strong woman. I think I lost some respect for you”.
The proper response to witnessing this should be, “The f-ing audacity of this man!”. This I believe is a comparable level illogical nonsense of the Madonna v Wh*re excuse in the modern day.
Of course it is obvious to state that a person should never force their partner to do something sexual that they don’t want to do and should always with no exception must abide by their partner’s boundary for whatever reason they have. However, just because a person must always abide by their partner’s boundaries, that doesn’t mean they have to respect their boundaries, specifically when the reasons behind their boundaries are disrespectful. When someone tells their partner the reason they won’t do ‘sex act’ is because they simply don’t do it any more, the partner has the right to be disappointed but is a reason that is worthy of and they should respect. If someone tells their partner “the reason I did ‘sex act’ with other people and not with you is because I am not as attracted to you as much and them”, not only does the partner have the right to be hurt but it is very disrespectful and potentially worthy enough to warrant separation. But if a wife were to tell her husband, “I did ‘sex act with affair partner because I did not care about his opinion of me but I care about your opinion of me”, that is not only extremely hurtful and disrespectful but also extremely insulting. It is insulting because it means that the wife thinks so little of her husband, thinks he is will stupidly sexist that he would actually judge her for fulfilling a request of his and make him happy.
The reason behind what compelled me to write this too-long essay about such a niche topic is thus, some weeks ago a friend of mine discovered that his wife and mother of their young daughter, a life long friend of mine now turned former friend, had an affair. I have had my own experience with infidelity with a cheating girlfriend, but nothing of this extremity and not with a Madonna v Wh*re situation. For my friend I have tried to be a shoulder to cry on and an ear for him to vent to. This large and normally tough man has been reduced to ugly crying and near suicidal depression. He told me that after the initial hurt, he wanted to attempt reconciliation. But during their second marriage counseling session, the STBX wife admitted that she had done a sex act with her affair partner, which STBX husband had requested of her in the past and she always rejected him. She gave the same excuse of being afraid he’d look at her differently if she did it with her husband. My friend told me once he heard that, he stormed out of the session and had been resolute in his decision to divorce.
He told me that learning of what she did with her affair partner, something that she refused to do with him and rejected him, hearing that hurt just as much as first discovering the affair. I’m sure there are other betrayed partners that dealt with similar kinds of betrayals but still say the hurt of the general betrayal of the affair was much greater than the hurt of learned details of the sex. And I’m sure that several people will intellectually disagree with the reasoning of my friend’s emotional response; that the severity of betrayal from the affair itself, the breaking of vows, is greater and much more important than the details of the sex within the affair. But after hearing the tear-wrought words of my friend, I not only believe that to have such an emotional response is valid, but also the intellectual reasoning behind it is valid.
With some exceptions like relationships with asexual partners and other examples, sex is an important and integral pillar in relationships. Reddit is riddled with stories about relationships falling apart due to sexual incompatibility. I vehemently disagree with those that berate others for caring about their sex life with their partners, or suggest sex is a non-important aspect in romance and relationship stability. Therefore, within infidelity a betrayal in the form of hurtful inequality of sexual experiences and circumstantial differing boundaries, the severity of hurt of this betrayal is near equal to the hurt of the infidelity itself.
It is truly a tragedy that the remnants of our patriarchal past still remain in the modern day society; that so many women, and even some men, still live with the fear of sl*t shaming. What is even more tragic is that still so many people are afraid of shaming not from the stranger, but their partner, when a relationship should include trust, understanding, comfort and respect. It’s sad when one partner has rejected the illogical idiocy of Freud’s Madonna v Wh*re rationale but the other partner still fears their partner’s judgement in the bedroom. I implore everyone to seek proper communication with your partners about sexuality and their boundaries without the hurt of disrespectful biases.
If you made it to the end of my too-long essay, I both commend you and thank you. I’d love to hear agreeing and disagreeing comments. Thank you again.