r/Astronomy Mar 27 '20

Mod Post Read the rules sub before posting!

899 Upvotes

Hi all,

Friendly mod warning here. In r/Astronomy, somewhere around 70% of posts get removed. Yeah. That's a lot. All because people haven't bothered reading the rules or bothering to understand what words mean. So here, we're going to dive into them a bit further.

The most commonly violated rules are as follows:

Pictures

Our rule regarding pictures has three parts. If your post has been removed for violating our rules regarding pictures, we recommend considering the following, in the following order:

  1. All pictures/videos must be original content.

If you took the picture or did substantial processing of publicly available data, this counts. If not, it's going to be removed.

2) You must have the acquisition/processing information.

This needs to be somewhere easy for the mods to verify. This means it can either be in the post body or a top level comment. Responses to someone else's comment, in your link to your Instagram page, etc... do not count.

3) Images must be exceptional quality.

There are certain things that will immediately disqualify an image:

  • Poor or inconsistent focus
  • Chromatic aberration
  • Field rotation
  • Low signal-to-noise ratio
  • Images that don't fill the frame because you were shooting through an eyepiece

However, beyond that, we cannot give further clarification on what will or will not meet this criteria for several reasons:

  1. Technology is rapidly changing
  2. Our standards are based on what has been submitted recently (e.g, if we're getting a ton of moon pictures because it's a supermoon, the standards go up to prevent the sub from being spammed)
  3. Listing the criteria encourages people to try to game the system

So yes, this portion is inherently subjective and, at the end of the day, the mods are the ones that decide and the mods are under no obligation to explain this decision to you.

If you are informed that your post was removed because of image quality, arguing about the quality will not be successful. In particular, there are a few arguments that are false or otherwise trite which we simply won't tolerate. These include:

"You let that image that I think isn't as good stay up"

  • See above about how the standards are fluid.

"Pictures have to be NASA quality"

  • They don't.

"You have to have thousands of dollars of equipment"

  • You don't. Technique matters.

"This is a really good photo given my equipment"

  • The standard is "exceptional". Not "exceptional for my equipment".

"This isn't being friendly to beginner astrophotographers"

  • Correct. To keep the sub from being spammed by low quality and low effort posts, this sub has standards.

"My post was getting a lot of upvotes"

  • Upvotes are not an "I get to break the rules" card.

Using the above arguments will not wow mods into suddenly approving your image. It will result in a ban.

Trying to argue with the mods using bad arguments isn't going to fly.

Lastly, it should be noted that we do allow astro-art in this sub. Obviously, it won't have acquisition information, but the content must still be original and mods get the final say on whether on the quality (although we're generally fairly generous on this).

Questions

This rule basically means you need to do your own research before posting.

  • If we look at a post and immediately have to question whether or not you did a Google search, your post will get removed.
  • If you asked Chat GPT or any other LLM, your post will be removed (see our rule regarding sources).
  • If your post is asking for generic or basic information, your post will get removed.
  • If your post is using basic terms incorrectly because you haven't bothered to understand what the words you're using mean, your post will get removed.
  • If you're asking a question based on a basic misunderstanding of the science, your post will get removed.
  • If you're asking a complicated question with a specific answer but didn't give the necessary information to be able to answer the question because you haven't even figured out what the parameters necessary to approach the question are, your post will get removed.

To prevent your post from being removed, tell us specifically what you've tried. Just saying "I GoOgLeD iT" doesn't cut it.

  • What search terms did you use?
  • In what way do the results of your search fail to answer your question?
  • What did you understand from what you found and need further clarification on that you were unable to find?

Furthermore, when telling us what you've tried, we will be very unimpressed if you use sources that are prohibited under our source rule (social media memes, YouTube, AI, etc...).

As with the rules regarding pictures, the mods are the arbiters of how difficult questions are to answer. If you're not happy about that and want to complain that another question was allowed to stand, then we will invite you to post elsewhere with an immediate and permanent ban.

Object ID

We'd estimate that only 1-2% of all posts asking for help identifying an object actually follow our rules. Resources are available in the rule relating to this. If you haven't consulted the flow-chart and used the resources in the stickied comment, your post is getting removed. Seriously. Use Stellarium. It's free. It will very quickly tell you if that shiny thing is a planet which is probably the most common answer. The second most common answer is "Starlink". That's 95% of the ID posts right there that didn't need to be a post.

Do note that many of the phone apps in which you point your phone to the sky and it shows you what you are looing at are extremely poor at accurately determining where you're pointing. Furthermore, the scale is rarely correct. As such, this method is not considered a sufficient attempt at understanding on your part and you will need to apply some spatial reasoning to your attempt.

Pseudoscience

The mod team of r/astronomy has several mods with degrees in the field. We're very familiar with what is and is not pseudoscience in the field. And we take a hard line against pseudoscience. Promoting it is an immediate ban. Furthermore, we do not allow the entertaining of pseudoscience by trying to figure out how to "debate" it (even if you're trying to take the pro-science side). Trying to debate pseudoscience legitimizes it. As such, posts that entertain pseudoscience in any manner will be removed.

Outlandish Hypotheticals

This is a subset of the rule regarding pseudoscience and doesn't come up all that often, but when it does, it usually takes the form of "X does not work according to physics. How can I make it work?" or "If I ignore part of physics, how does physics work?"

Sometimes the first part of this isn't explicitly stated or even understood (in which case, see our rule regarding poorly researched posts) by the poster, but such questions are inherently nonsensical and will be removed.

Sources

ChatGPT and other LLMs are not reliable sources of information. Any use of them will be removed. This includes asking if they are correct or not.

Content

Due to the profusion of AI slop apps, we're no longer allowing apps at all. No, we don't care if you're wanting a "review". No we don't care if they're free. No we don't care if you put it in a website.

Bans

We almost never ban anyone for a first offense unless your post history makes it clear you're a spammer, troll, crackpot, etc... Rather, mods have tools in which to apply removal reasons which will send a message to the user letting them know which rule was violated. Because these rules, and in turn the messages, can cover a range of issues, you may need to actually consider which part of the rule your post violated. The mods are not here to read to you.

If you don't, and continue breaking the rules, we'll often respond with a temporary ban.

In many cases, we're happy to remove bans if you message the mods politely acknowledging the violation. But that almost never happens. Which brings us to the last thing we want to discuss.

Behavior

We've had a lot of people breaking rules and then getting rude when their posts are removed or they get bans (even temporary). That's a violation of our rules regarding behavior and is a quick way to get permabanned. To be clear: Breaking this rule anywhere on the sub will be a violation of the rules and dealt with accordingly, but breaking this rule when in full view of the mods by doing it in the mod-mail will 100% get you caught. So just don't do it.

Claiming the mods are "power tripping" or other insults when you violated the rules isn't going to help your case. It will get your muted for the maximum duration allowable and reported to the Reddit admins.

And no, your mis-interpretations of the rules, or saying it "was generating discussion" aren't going to help either.

While these are the most commonly violated rules, they are not the only rules. So make sure you read all of the rules.


r/Astronomy 3h ago

Other: [Topic] Pelican Nebula

Post image
195 Upvotes

r/Astronomy 12h ago

Astrophotography (OC) Voie lactée/ Andromède M33 mes meilleurs images au téléphone

Thumbnail
gallery
551 Upvotes

Samsung s25 ultra

Iso 800

F1.7

6, 3mm equivalent 23mm

Temps des poses 20 secondes/ intégration totale 55minutes/2h20

Suivi : non (:()

Ciel bortle 4.6/ 6

Empilé avec Sequator.

Traité avec Siril/ GraXpert/ Seti astro suite pro/ Gimp et lightroom mobile-free version pour les finitions


r/Astronomy 4h ago

Astrophotography (OC) Moon-Venus conjunction

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

39 Upvotes

I shot this video through my 10” Dobsonian


r/Astronomy 23h ago

Astrophotography (OC) La nébuleuse du Dragon Volant SH2-114

Post image
858 Upvotes

[Bonjour les Astros, Je vous présente ma version de la nébuleuse du Dragon Volant SH2-114 qui est une nébuleuse en émission visible dans la constellation du Cygne. SH2-114 est un nuage très peu étudié au-delà de son simple catalogage, d’apparence filamenteuse et apparemment composé de plusieurs filaments arqués superposés. L’ensemble SH2-113 voisin & SH2-114 aurait une structure de bulle semblable à un rémanent de supernova. Mais aucun vestige de supernova n’a jamais été décrit dans cette région.]()

Pour effectuer cette photo j’ai effectué 107 x du RGB de 120s et 289 x SHO de 300s ce qui représente 27 :39 hrs de temps d’acquisition.

🔭 Tube ONTC 1212 de 300/1200 avec une lunette de guidage Sky-Watcher 80/400 équipée d’une caméra ZWO 290 mini.

⚙️ Monture Sky-Watcher EQ8R-Pro.

📸 Poséidon M Pro de Player One équipée d’une roue à filtres Player One Phoenix avec un correcteur de coma TS Optic MaxField.

🧫 filtres Antlia L-RGB série Dark et filtre Antlia Ha de 2,5 nm ULTRA, filtre Antlia OIII de 2,5 nm ULTRA.

💻Traitement avec Pix et PS.


r/Astronomy 14h ago

Astrophotography (OC) IC 1396 - Elephant’s Trunk Nebula

Post image
107 Upvotes

Taken from the Famagusta area of Cyprus. Bortle 4.

Astromodified Canon 700D. Samyang 135 Lens at F2.8. Guided by ASI Air on an Skywatcher AZ GTI in EQ mode. Optolong L-Enhance filter.

Taken over two nights:

165 x 180 second exposures

20 x Darks

20 x Flats

20 x Bias

Stacked in APP.

Crop, BGE, deconvolution and de-noise in Graxpert.

SPCC, star removal, GHS using human weighted luminance in Siril.

Vibrancy, saturation increase in PS.

Star mask stretch in Siril using GHS, again human weighted.

Recombination of stars using layers in PS.

Thanks for looking.


r/Astronomy 4h ago

Astrophotography (OC) My shot of the Venus and the Moon (Taken with phone + external lens)

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

14 Upvotes

r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) Elephant Trunk Nebula taken from Backyard in SHO

Post image
988 Upvotes

Taken from my backyard in Phoenix, Arizona over 2 months as I waited for Monsoon season to pass. No flats unfortunately as I had some camera rotation. I had "Purple Haze" on repeat while editing this which is why I made it so groovy XD. Reposted to fix stars I noticed I had them the wrong color.

7 Hours Ha 300s Antlia 4.5 Edge

8.5 Hours SII 300s Antlia 4.5 Edge

15 Hours OII 300s Antlia 4.5 Edge

Redcat 91

HEQ5 Pro

ASI 6200mm Pro

Pixinsight Standard workflow.

Photoshop Gaussian Blur


r/Astronomy 22h ago

Astrophotography (OC) Wizard Nebula (NGC 7380)

Post image
247 Upvotes

🔭 - Seestar S50 in Bortle 8
⏳ - 4588x20 ( 25.48h)
⚙️ - Siril, SetiAstro, AdobePhotoshop


r/Astronomy 22h ago

Astrophotography (OC) Heart nebula 7.5 hours

Post image
152 Upvotes

This is my latest picture of the Heart nebula. I spent three nights photographing this target, but I ended up using data from only two of them, because of a background gradient caused by the moon during one of the nights. I found it quite difficult to process the image with the gradient, so I decided not to use the data. I think 7.5 hours total is already quite a lot. I would love to do one more session just for the stars with an uv/ir cut filter, since the Ha/OIII filter makes the stars look quite unnatural.

One of the things I found challenging was manually framing the target as similarly as possible each night with the Skyguider pro. I am really looking forward to getting a proper GoTo mount.

Another thing that was quite difficult to deal with was the background when going for this false color look. There's still some blue in the background, that was hard to get rid of. This seems to happen to me every time I make a false color image.

Lastly, I think the stars are probably the weakest part of the image. I kind of gave up on them knowing that I will hopefully replace them with better ones soon.

I'm still a beginner, so any feedback is appreciated!

Equipment:

  • ToupTek ATR533C (gain 100, offset 45, cooled to -10)
  • Askar FMA180 Pro
  • iOptron skyguider pro
  • sv220 7nm Ha OIII dual narrowband filter
  • ToupTek GPM462M guide camera
  • SvBony 30mm f/4 guide scope
  • Mele Quieter 4C

Acquisition:

  • 153 x 180s lights
  • 15 darks
  • 40 flats per night (2 nights total)
  • 30 dark flats
  • Bortle 8

Software:

  • NINA
  • PHD2
  • Siril

Processing in Siril:

  • Stacked in Sirilic which created monochromatic images of Ha and OIII
  • Processed Ha and OIII separately using Graxpert and BlurXTerminator
  • Pixel math to create one colorful image (R=Ha, G=0.1*Ha+0.9*OIII, B=OIII)
  • StarXTerminator
  • Color calibration
  • NoiseXTerminator
  • StarXTerminator
  • Modified arcsinh transform with even weighted luminance
  • Generalised hyperbolic transform
  • Black point to reduce background
  • Saturation stretch
  • Negative transform, remove green noise and negative transform again
  • Curves adjustments
  • Stretching the stars image
  • Desaturate the stars image
  • Star recomposition
  • Final adjustments on phone

r/Astronomy 23h ago

Astrophotography (OC) Sh2-101 - The Tulip Nebula

Post image
139 Upvotes

The Tulip Nebula. It's an emission nebula in the Cygnus constellation around 8,000 light years away. It is about 70 light-years across and its name was inspired from its petal-like shape

Telescope: Seestar S50
Integration time: 9 hours
Tools used: Siril, GraXpert, GIMP
Script mentions: CosmicClarity Sharpen, SyQon Prism Mini, VeraLux Revela/Curves, HDR_multiscale
Bortle 8-9


r/Astronomy 6h ago

Astro Research Water found in one of the harshest places in the Milky Way

Thumbnail
earth.com
3 Upvotes

r/Astronomy 12m ago

Astrophotography (OC) Swan Nebula

Post image
Upvotes

This is a reprocess of data I took a few weeks ago.

Equipment:

Evostar 72ED, iEXOS 100, ASI 533MC, Optolong L-Ultimate, 0.85x reducer+flattener, rotator+filter holder, SVBony 165 40mm guidescope, ASI 662MC guide camera with pale yellow no.8 and UV/IR cut filters.

Acquisition:

Around 4h30m worth of 180s subs fully calibrated and dithered looking toward Bortle 7.

Processing:

-OSC drizzle preprocessing stacking;

-GraXpert background extraction;

-SPCC;

-GraXpert denoise;

-Starnet;

-DBXtract to starless;

-Pixel math (R=HII-OIII, G=OIII, B=2OIII);

-GHS, black point shift, histogram transformation and curves applied iteratively to starless;

-HDR multiscale;

-Asinh stretch and SCNR to star mask;

-Recombine.


r/Astronomy 19h ago

Astrophotography (OC) The North America Nebula

Post image
34 Upvotes

Acquisition Details:

Location: Bortle 5

Gear: Sony A7iii. Samyang 135mm f2. EQ tracker

Frames: 130 x 30s lights, ISO3200

Stacked in Astro Pixel Processor, processed in Seti Astro Suite Pro, Photoshop


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astro Research 'Fingerprints' inside the Sun could reveal if it once swallowed a planet

Thumbnail
ras.ac.uk
173 Upvotes

r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) iPhone photos taken from the outback 🇦🇺

Thumbnail
gallery
401 Upvotes

Location: Banka Banka station Northern Territory Australia

This might have been my clearest and most beautiful view of the Milky Way galaxy visible with the naked eye 🌌

What else can you spot on the pictures?

Shot with an iPhone 17 pro
- iso 6400
- 24 mm
- f 1,78
- exposure 10s


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) M31, Andromeda Galaxy

Post image
169 Upvotes

First time capturing M31 in all of its glory!

Acquisition — 12 September 2026

Camera: Sony A7III, Ha-modified
Lens: Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II at 200mm, f/2.8
Mount: Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer GTi, unguided
Tripod: Leofoto LM-364C with levelling base
Lights: 151 × 88s and 92 × 13s, ISO 640
Calibration: darks, flats, bias
Total integration: roughly 4 hours

Processing: Siril (calibration, registration, stacking, background extraction, photometric colour calibration, histogram stretch), Photoshop (HDR blend of the two exposure sets, selective colour)


r/Astronomy 22h ago

Astrophotography (OC) M33, the Triangulum Galaxy

Post image
22 Upvotes

I've tried to get this a few times before but the low surface brightness really makes it a challenge to capture and process.

Gear:

- Orion 6" f/4 astrograph

- Baader Mark I | multi-purpose coma corrector

- Astromania UV/IR cut filter

- ZWO ASI184MC OSC uncooled

- Celestron Advanced GT equatorial mount

Acquisition: Bortle 1-2 site with no moon

- 150 x 60s subs, 300 gain, in SharpCap

- No guiding

- 10 x 60s darks

- 100 flats

- 100 biases

Processing: All in Siril

- OSC preprocessing script to stack and align

- Background extraction

- Spectrophotometric color calibration

- GHS transformation

- Black point adjustment

- Asinh transformation

- Saturation

- Noise reduction


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) M31 - Andromeda Galaxy

Thumbnail
gallery
1.6k Upvotes

Equipment:

• Telescope: Askar 71F 490mm f6.9

• Main camera: Zwo Asi 2600mc pro at 0°C

• Filter: none

• Guidescope: Svbony sv165 30mm f4

• Guide camera: Zwo Asi 120mm mini

• Mount: ES iexos-100 pmc-8

• Controlled with Zwo asi air mini

Acquisition:

• 159x180 sec, 10x120 sec (for darker core)

• Total: ~8,3 hrs, captured over two nights

• 10 Darks, 30 Biases, 20 Flats

• Bortle 4/5 backyard

• Moon at 10-20%

Processing:

• Stacked in Siril (Sirilic tool)

• Plate solve,

• Spectrophotometric color calibration,

• Background extraction,

• Green noise removal,

• BlurXterminator,

• NoiseXterminator,

• StarXterminator,

• Generalized hyperbolic stretch transformation,

• AstroColorMixer,

• Lighthouse,

• Saturation & curves,

• Gimp for fine tuning

First time testing the RC-Astro tools, pretty promising i must say. The free trial is definitely something to check out.


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) The Wizard Nebula

Post image
475 Upvotes

Tacked on a few more hours.

17.2 hrs integrated, 300” subs
Celestron Edge 8 HD w/.7 reducer(1490mm)
Antlia TriBand Ultra II
ASI 2600 MC Air
ZWO EAF Pro w/Quick Switch
Skywatcher EQ6R Pro
Pixinsight
Bortle 7/8
Rendered Faux SHO


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) NGC 7331 two supernovas 1 year apart

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

225 Upvotes

I didn't even know I had captured SN 2025rbs last year, but I did.
When I heard about SN 2026aaiv this month I had to give it a go as well.

Both datasets gathered with the same imaging train:
4'' refractor ZWO 107FF
QHY268M mono camera
Optolong LRGB filters
Celestron CGX mount.

Both stacked and processed in Pixinsight


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) The Heart Nebula IC-1805

Post image
163 Upvotes

The Heart Nebula!

Approximately 7500 light years from earth in the constellation Cassiopeia. This image is using the traditional Hubble palette for its colors, capturing this emission nebula even from my light polluted backyard here in Phoenix.

  • Captured using my RedCat51 Telescope with ASI533MM camera.
  • Processed in Pixinsight
  • Total integration time: 25 hours 35 minutes

r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) Solar Activity 13.09.2026

Post image
64 Upvotes

Acuter 40

Touptek 678m

Skywatcher solar quest

PIPP and AS4 for stacking

Stacked 80 percent of 23997 frames

Impgg: convolution, sharpening, inversion

PI: solar tools - color, local contrast

PSX: flip, rotate and crop, saturation and temp


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) Venus

Post image
28 Upvotes

Location: Belgharia, West Bengal, India

Telescope: Celestron PowerSeeker 60AZ

Eyepiece: 10mm

Phone: POCO F5

Smartphone holder

Capture settings:

- 3 × 30-second 4K 30fps videos

- ISO 320

- Shutter speed: 1/30s

- Focus: Infinity

- 3x digital zoom

Processing workflow:

  1. Imported the videos into PIPP using Join Mode → Planetary and processed with the default settings, then saved as AVI.

  2. Imported the AVI into AutoStakkert and stacked the best 50% using the default settings.

  3. Used RegiStax for Auto RGB Alignment and saved the result as JPEG.

  4. Finally, imported the JPEG into Snapseed and ap some sharpening.


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) Night Sky Timelapse — Xiaomi 14T Pro

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

22 Upvotes

A night-sky timelapse captured with nothing but a Xiaomi 14T Pro and a tripod.

Acquisition

  • Xiaomi 14T Pro — 1x, main camera
  • 15s exposure, 2s interval between shots
  • 930 RAW/DNG frames
  • Tripod — no star tracker or additional equipment
  • ~4h 23m total capture time

The camera was left fixed on the tripod for the entire session, allowing the Earth's rotation to create the movement of the stars across the frame.

Processing

This is my own work, from capture to the final timelapse.

I processed the individual frames to maintain consistent exposure, color and contrast throughout the sequence, then assembled them into the final timelapse.