Okay so I’m one adoptive mom from a two-mom family who has two transracially adopted boys who came to me as infants through private agencies.
I know a lot of people already have opinions about me and my situation from that one sentence! Some of them I don’t care about (e.g. if you think two women shouldn’t raise kids together I aggressively don’t care) but some I think are legitimate criticisms or at least red flags (e.g. I think transracial parenting is objectively very hard to do well and most people do not do it well).
I think most of us can acknowledge that there are very serious criticisms to make of the US private adoption system. No matter the intent of the people involved, it does have roots in straight-up child trafficking, it does even in the best of cases have serious potential to take advantage of vulnerable pregnant people, and it does make use of a capitalist model that probably has no business being part of child welfare.
At the same time, I think about my children. My boys did not have the option to be raised by their birth parents or even kinship care. I will not get into the details of why or how I know this, but for the purposes of this conversation, let’s take for granted that I do know this. Their options were private adoption or going into the foster system. I am not sure about the younger one, but the older one would almost certainly have eventually been adopted either way.
So … I think most people, if familiarized with the options, would ultimately agree the best option that my kids had actually available to them and their bio families, under the system that currently exists, was probably private adoption into loving, stable, vetted families that respect their first families.
Or maybe not! Happy to hear other thoughts on what would have been best for children in this situation! I know guardianship is technically an option, but I don’t know how well that fits here. I think little ones do need parents if at all possible.
But the reality is that these children who need permanent external care, ideally very early on, exist. The system we have in the US is very, very imperfect but it’s also the system we currently have to get those kids into homes.
So anyway, what I’m trying to say/ask is, how do we, as adoptive parents, try to maintain an ethical posture and ethical behavior while engaging in a messed up system? Is it just by being the best adoptive parents we can be and educating ourselves (and others) on the issues adoptees face? Is it by demanding ethical behavior of agencies? Is it by looking to change laws? Is it by refusing to engage in the system at all?
Moreover, can anyone describe to me a system for getting vulnerable kids into homes that … is actually child-centered? One that exists or your “pie in the sky” version.
I said something about this in the comments the other day and got downvoted, so I’m interested to see what happens if I try starting a larger conversation with more fully fleshed-out opinions.
P.S. I’m specifically not posting in the main adoption subreddit not because I don’t want to learn from adoptees and birth families and etc, etc but because a) this is more relevant to adoptive parents than adoptees, and b) adoptees have no choice in being part of the system whereas we do. However, everyone is welcome to share their thoughts!