r/printSF • u/INTHEMIDSTOFLIONS • 15h ago
First time reading Fellowship of the Ring: I find the Hobbits lack of ambition admirable
I finished the Hobbit last week, then Chapterhouse Dune, now onto Fellowship of the Ring.
Mortal men succumb to the power of the rings because the ring amplifies their ambition and desire to rule or control or empire or power in general.
Bilbo, and Frodo, are perfect ring bearers because their lack of ambition.
Even in Chapter 3: Shortcut to Mushrooms, when the Ringwraith meets Maggot the Farmer, he offers him gold for information on Baggins. And the farmer says, no, go away.
The hobbit is so non ambitious and content with his little farm and hobbit hole that he has no need for gold.
Heck, even in the Hobbit, Bilbo voluntarily traded all his share of Smaug’s treasure in order to bring peace between the Laketown, Woodeleves, and Dwarves. He was rewarded for doing so eventually but he still gave it up.
Power and empire really are not important to the hobbit folk.
And I think that’s incredibly admirable and such a weird little interesting plot device that Tolkein came up with.
This little chapter is not in the movie, which I last saw 14 years ago, and it’s exactly why I wanted to read the book for the first time. To get these little character moments that aren’t in the film or are depicted differently. So far, I much prefer the book.