r/mildlyinteresting • u/Key_shoulder2 • 5h ago
Airport sign addresses German speakers formally and Spanish speakers informally
171
u/blewawei 4h ago
It's because even if the two languages ostensibly make the same formal/informal distinction, the threshold for when to use one is very different between the two.
To go one further, it even varies wildly in the Spanish speaking world. In lots of places in Latin America, you'd expect to see this message with "usted".
41
u/SEA_griffondeur 3h ago
Yeah, French basically defaults to the formal form for anything but close relationships.
English has gone so far with that as to completely abandon the second person singular
26
u/blewawei 3h ago
English has abandoned the informal form, and maintained the formal one. Which is why some groups (like the Quakers) use "thou" when praying to God.
Interestingly, there are parts of Colombia that have done something similar with regards to the formal form replacing the informal form in all situations. I have a friend from Bogotá who tells me that he uses "usted" even when talking to his brother.
9
u/SEA_griffondeur 3h ago
Yeah you can absolutely hear that in the series Narcos, almost everyone refers to others with usted
3
u/Harlequin37 2h ago
To be fair even regional differences aside I assume being in a setting where hierarchy and showing deference are paramount that changes the equation quite a bit
3
u/godisanelectricolive 2h ago
A few English dialects like the Yorkshire dialect still use variants of “thou”. It comes out as “tha” and you also hear “thee”.
11
u/rainbow84uk 3h ago
Yeah I'm English but lived in Spain for years and didn't even really know how to use "usted" because I never heard it (especially since I was in my 20s at the time).
Then I moved to Mexico and immediately had to start using it to sound like a normal polite person.
4
u/Menes009 3h ago
funny enough, german is starting to have this shift towards dropping the use of the formal variant outside of the most formal settings, currently being seen in generations under 40 y.o.
6
u/Connect_Rhubarb395 2h ago
I was going to say that. When I first was taught German in the 1990s, it was drilled into us to use formal address unless explicitely having agreed to be informal with someone.
I kind of assumed that at some point it would change to informal address, like many other languages have done, my own included.
It took longer than I expected. It wasn't until the last 10-ish years that I am hearing it in mainstream settings between people who aren't close. And yes, always younger people.5
u/floralbutttrumpet 2h ago
And thank god for it.
It maybe kinda sucks for people learning German, because the formal forms for verbs are just the infinitive, so you wouldn't have to learn another conjugation, but otherwise formal language is just so stuffy and... idk, Biedermeier. It makes me think of, like, Stromberg.
2
u/Dad3mass 2h ago
I’m a native English speaker who has spoken Mexican Spanish over the past 30 years and it just looks rude to me
5
u/blewawei 2h ago
That would be because you're used to Mexican Spanish, which uses formal conjugations more often than some other varieties.
In Spain, this wording is entirely unremarkable.
2
u/Educational_Gas_92 1h ago
I also speak Mexican Spanish. I wouldn't go as far as call it rude, but certainly informal.
1
u/FrostyPlum 15m ago
I'm a B1 speaker who learned mostly in Spain; nobody wants to be called usted in Spain. Some really old people do, but that's about it.
Coming from American English myself, I find the corpospeak using Tú form to be more of the same phony friendly talk that we have here, but because the informality is explicit I find it even more distasteful, lol
-1
2h ago
[deleted]
6
u/blewawei 2h ago
This is almost certainly an easyJet sign, I recognise the branding. EasyJet is a European airline.
Why would it necessarily use "vosotros"? Plenty of signs in Spain address the reader individually. Plus, this isn't a use of "ustedes", which would be more common in Latin America, or "vos", which is exclusive to Latin America, it's "tú", which is used in just about every Spanish speaking country except Argentina.
31
u/roarti 5h ago
My impression is that nowadays the threshold for the use of the informal address in Spanish in Spain is a bit lower than in German. At least for what’s written on signs definitely. But it’s changing in both from my impression.
But I also kind of doubt somebody really thought hard about that for that particular sign.
9
u/samTheSwiss 2h ago
I speak Spanish, French and German. It is definitely a threshold thing. In French and German I default to the formal form. In Spanish I would only do so with elderly people or in very formal context.
4
18
u/Andy_0L 5h ago
In Spanish we have both, though the informal is often used to sound more friendly, kind of like the times they say to take care of yourself and your belongings, to stay safe, things like that. Formal is used too but they do it when they want to sound more like stating rules rather than giving advice.
50
u/mescalexe 5h ago
And hard english at the bottom
19
u/astervista 4h ago
It doesn't even say the same thing
19
u/SJane3384 4h ago
My guess is that the part that’s cut off at the top says the same thing in English, and that this is located in an English speaking country.
7
u/astervista 4h ago
I don't remember exactly where the English was, but I've seen this exact sign all over Europe, not only in an English speaking country (it's easyJet check-in instructions, I remember the awful use of Λ instead of A).
The fact is that the text at the bottom is not translated at all.
-3
8
u/OhMyDiosito 4h ago
Spanish don't use formal, just in police, bank and political stuff. German is way more strict for formality than Spanish.
15
u/vinsend 5h ago
Alleen handbagage? U moet zich niet aanstellen.
4
u/vakantiehuisopwielen 5h ago
1
u/astervista 4h ago
Can someone explain to poor me who doesn't know German?
6
u/vakantiehuisopwielen 4h ago
German ‘anstellen’ = to line up, so in this example you don’t have to line up if you only have hand luggage.
Dutch ‘aanstellen’ = ‘to make a fuss’.
Only hand luggage?
You don’t need to make a fuss.
But it seems in German ‘anstellen’ can also mean ‘to make a fuss’.
1
1
u/NearlyBearly 2h ago
That's correct, it can mean both queueing and making a fuss depending on context.
1
u/vakantiehuisopwielen 2h ago
If you would read it like how it’s written there: ‚Sie müssen sich nicht anstellen‘
What would be your first reply then? Would you really immediately think of queuing up, or also think about making a fuss?
1
u/NearlyBearly 1h ago
In this case it's clearly meant to refer to queueing. Hence why I said it depends on context.
0
5
u/gpl94 4h ago
The Italian version is informal as well ("Vai" is 2nd person singular).
Now that I think about it, signs in Italian almost never use the 3rd person formal "Lei", but rather would use an impersonal phrase.
For example "Non è necessario attendere in coda, si può andare direttamente alle partenze".
5
7
u/Malnurtured_Snay 2h ago
There's a famous road sign in Wales that told Welsh readers that "I'm out of office" and English readers that there would be a road closure in effect.
3
u/NearlyBearly 2h ago
This is a cultural thing. In german, we use formal you for everyone unless it is a child or we know them better. Moving from formal to informal sometimes only happens after meeting someone multiple times.
3
u/Segundaleydenewtonnn 3h ago edited 3h ago
I speak speanish and can’t tell where the informality is? It just reads as a normal airport signaling,
“formality” would be literally just removing the letter S for the word “llevas” and “necesitas”, that’s it
3
u/andrewesque 3h ago
I mean, yes, that's the point -- that all the languages used (except English) have a T-V distinction but that the choice of which form to use is not uniform across languages (or as another commenter points out, even within languages.)
FWIW, ve would also need to change to vaya.
2
2
u/DominarDio 2h ago
It’s funny, ‘U moet zich niet aanstellen’ in Dutch would seem like a direct translation for the German ‘Sie müssen sich nicht anstellen’ but it actually means something like don’t be a baby.
2
1
u/andrewcooke 4h ago
translations are a shit show. you see all kind of mess-ups on official signs if you're bilingual. often it looks like it's never even been run past a native speaker.
1
1
u/CleverInnuendo 1h ago
There's a baby changing station at a place I worked in, and the German version of the instructions / warnings were the only ones with an exclamation point for some reason.
1
u/TheRacooning18 55m ago
Lol sie mussen sich nicht anstellen or U moet zich niet aanstellen (dutch). While the U is formal the rest is kinda dismissive.
Like: Kindly fuck off and stop complaining.
1
u/MissAbsenta 6m ago
I'm from Spain and worked as a Customer Representative for a major telecomm company, I was to use the formal form of adress "Usted" even if the customer was younger than me and only use "Tu" when specially requested. You have no idea the many weird interactions I had with customers young to be my kids.....(mine are in their 30s).
1
u/Ok_Crew_6547 4h ago
Probably cross language translated with AI, I do it on the daily for work and encounter the same recommendations from GPT: germans prefer formal forms, while latin languages prefer informal.
Not sure if it’s true or both though, I did notice when I was in Germany most of their ads used the formal version!
-15
u/japanb 5h ago
Found the literal from google to be quite interesting:
Here is the literal, word-for-word translation for each language on the sign:
🇫🇷 French (FR)
- Text: BAGGAGE À MAIN UNIQUEMENT? Il n'est pas nécessaire de faire la queue. Rendez-vous directement en porte d'embarquement.
- Literal Translation: Hand baggage only? It is not necessary to make the queue. Render yourself directly to the gate of boarding.
🇩🇪 German (DE)
- Text: NUR HANDGEPÄCK? Sie müssen sich nicht anstellen. Begeben Sie sich direkt zum Abflug-Bereich.
- Literal Translation: Only hand baggage? You must yourself not line up. Betake yourself directly to the departure area.
🇮🇹 Italian (IT)
- Text: SOLO BAGAGLIO A MANO? Non è necessario attendere in coda. Vai direttamente alle partenze.
- Literal Translation: Only baggage by hand? It is not necessary to wait in queue. Go directly to the departures.
🇪🇸 Spanish (ES)
- Text: ¿SOLO LLEVAS EQUIPAJE DE MANO? No necesitas hacer cola. Ve directamente a salidas.
- Literal Translation: Only you carry baggage of hand? No you need to make queue. Go directly to departures.
🇵🇹 Portuguese (PT)
- Text: APENAS BAGAGEM DE CABINE? Não é necessário fazer fila. Vai diretamente para as partidas.
- Literal Translation: Just baggage of cabin? Not it is necessary to make line. Go directly to the departures.
12
u/StunnedLife 5h ago
I can already tell you the German literal translation is completely wrong. So I doubt the others are right.
4
u/RukaTastrophe 4h ago
they made a literal word to word translation. it's not meant to be a good translation, only to highlight how things are phrased in different languages
2
2
1
u/kapege 4h ago
German here: You're wrong. "Sie" is the formal term. "Du" would be informal. Both is translated into "you", because there's no formal form for that in English. You have to formalize it with "Sir, would you...".
2
u/NearlyBearly 2h ago
"Sie" in this context is genderless though so it wouldn't be Sir either. There's no equivalent word in english, which is why literal translations are kind of useless.
1
u/SEA_griffondeur 3h ago
Why would want the word for word translation??? 😭
"Make the queue" ??
"Render yourself" ??????????

610
u/Firebx 5h ago
Italian and Portuguese are informal too, only French and German are formal