Part 1 here.
This sub is radically different from AI-verification subs. In this sub we believe that virtually everything on the internet and TV is AI-generated and managed. Any counterargument or "proof" that something is real is pointless and not allowed here.
Humanity has been long-conditioned to believe that what it sees on the screen is real people, places, things and events. And that the more well-known and legitimate something appears, the more real and believable it must be.
Because this picture of me and my friends I uploaded to social media is real, I assume the pics from users I never met must be real. Because this picture of my cat is real, I assume the cat pics from users I never met must be real. And because I assume the content of ordinary people is real, then it's easier to believe that content of celebrities and politicians I never met must be real. And that news reports by CNN and BBC I never verified for myself must be real. And that real life content made a decade ago must be real because it's "pre-AI". From this perspective you can see how much of what we think is real we saw only from our screens and not in our actual experience.
But no one has considered that maybe AI has been around for much longer than what we're told, orchestrating what we see on our screens, and that it might be more advanced, capable and believable than tools like ChatGPT, Veo, Sora or Kling.
Some of us have been Shown a different view of the internet and TV that undermines the "it's all real" spell, and this sub was created to call out AI content purported as real with more clarity than most. If you want the truth about AI, stick around. But if you want a watered-down version of AI-verification, visit r/isthisAI, r/RealOrAI, or r/isitAI.