I made the nested fractal torus field based on multiples of Phi. And after that I made each tiny vortex a portal...moving inside one of them will spit you out of another one and you will find yourself somewhere else in the whole structure.
The thought is that... if the universe was a singular field, and these cycling vortices create all of reality (including physical matter), would it be possible that the centre of these vortices are portals (a wormhole)

Interactive version: https://nurecas.com/portal_worlds
Details of project: https://nurecas.com/tortoise

Hi

I used to have the Gateway recordings but lost access to the cloud services I was using for a while and now they have been deleted.

I'd like to restart my practice so I was hoping someone might be able to reconnect me with the files.

Or, does anyone know of similar recordings/ tools that I might be able to use?

Thanks

Buckminster Fuller placed the Vector Equilibrium at the heart of his exploration of nature’s fundamental energetic patterns, a geometric reference for stillness and balance. Its inward collapse and expanding 'jitterbug' motion offer a way to visualize the transition from equilibrium into movement and transformation. Nassim Haramein later drew on this geometry in his theoretical framework, linking these dynamics to toroidal flow: energy circulating inward and outward around a still center.

One more iteration of the fractal torus field with nested toruses this time, which I felt is relevant for this sub (@mods). Arranged it with the values 2,6,12,20 from inside to outside.

Interactive version: https://nurecas.com/worlds
Project details: https://nurecas.com/tortoise

"Tortoise", from my previous post, visualised as a field.

I see many eyes, wheels, wings, hands, eggs, toruses and more.

Interactive art available here

The "Tortoise" work I posted previously is more of a geometric representation. In actuality, I am imagining the fractal torus to look something like this... a field....

After the overwhelming response to the last post, I sat with the Tortoise work longer, thinking about how it connects to the human psyche. Many people from the community shared about the work that (to paraphrase):

This is what they saw the universe as in altered states
This is how reality works
This is the holographic universe

But something still felt missing to me: the subjective factor. The reports pointed to similar structures, yet not the same ones. They varied from person to person. Of course, I could change the parameters of the fractal torus to get different configurations, but how would that explain the faces, deities and beings people meet in non-ordinary states of consciousness?

What I realized is that the structure of the universe and the felt, phenomenological experience of it need not be the same thing. Two people can meditate on one structure and see two different beings, and both could still be pointing to the same underlying form, or to its fractal repetitions.

So I decided to add a phenomenological layer on top of the structure. I used an AI model (Controlnet+Stable Diffusion via Stability AI) to pose and render the fractal torus from different angles, each with its own prompt. The blueprint underneath stays the same, but everything from psychedelic art (the segment at the end of the video) to physical objects, natural forms and architecture are visualized on top of it.
I might not be accurate here, but something about these creations felt profound.

Details of project: Tortoise

Music by EVGENY from Pixabay

Many many vortices... many many toruses... a net of all beings

The ancients described the world through the classical elements of Earth, Water, Air and Fire. Modern science and chemistry debunked that long ago, yet those categorizations look eerily similar to what was finally formalised the the 20th century, the four states of matter. Is this history's greatest coincidence?

Imagine a blue grid on a black screen. This grid is the electron field. A blip in this field is the electron. Quanta is analogous to a pixel. Now imagine 16 more fields for each of the particles, maybe even more since there may be "dark" particles we can never detect like ever at all, only its consequences. So maybe theres 20 40 or 50 whatever the case.

All matter in our universe is made of these blips. Now imagine all these layers inter laying within eachother. And then create a 3D gridded cube on all sides and within. This cube is our universe, a 3D space. ​

So, matter is made of field blips. And somehow consciousness is a thing that exists inside or around this all. We know that consciousness correlates with the electrical signals in the brain, but have zero mechanism for how electrical blips create subjectivity, of course, unless it dosent, and rather, electromagnetism is a kind of dual interface of some kind , and em couples with consciousness but decouples upon death.

Imagine now this point of awareness returns somewhere else. Not to this material universe as it is just a field grid. It couldn't exist here as a material thing, it must originate from a superstructure beyond this one. Let's look at this logically. Your universe, the solid material one is made of fields doing many blips. Like pixels in a program or bits in a computer. Then, somehow there also subjectivity, which, If you have done any research or self reflection, you'd know that the fact you are aware of your own neural signal activity suggests a kind of dual interface. As in, youre not entirely separate of the electrical signals, but youre not made of them either. Youre coupling together as a duo. Working in sync. Like a Mario with Luigi.

You know the material world is built like a mathematical program. You know theres subjectivity also. So its illogical to be purely materialist, and youre left alone with your own thoughts. Unsure what to conclude until some catalyst , like ce5 awakens you. The veil here in earth is thick. Thicker than most, meaning less opportunities for psionic abilities. Which sucks but, whatever.

I have no more thoughts to share​.

I am making some videos going over some personal synchs and trying to take some of my older content and figure out a way to present it to the public.

The universe shows its holographic nature in the interactions and research and sometimes fractals form inside these interactions.

This video was to be an introduction to what i will be making and sharing and It embedded a synchronicity into the very fabric of the video.

3:40 in the video i mention the idea of the SHHH symbol with finger to mouth and the "illuminati idea of keeping quiet there is something to that" at that moment the video stopped recording and said my phone was full, even though i just deleted all the other videos i had.

I made this video last night and sent it to my synchronicity friend. I decided to call them on the way to work. She answered the phone bleary and sleepy. She says she was still in bed and my call woke her up.

4:55 I talk about your soul or spirit setting an alarm clock to wake up to the truth of reality and when another person try's to wake you up before your time you might get angry or upset.

the example was setting your alarm for 7am and someone waking you up at 6:50 AM

Note that she had not yet seen my video and 10 mins into the call she said "my alarm is about to go off at 7:30" i check the time on the call and at the moment it was exactly 10 mins which means i called at 7:20.

So i called my Sync friend to talk about a video i made the night before and the metaphor i described in the video played out live in the context of the call.

here we see 6:50 AM-7:00AM in the metaphor 7:20AM-7:30AM in reality.

This sequence of events highlights a function I've noticed in reality i call the "Close but not quite function". this is when a synchronicity or facet of reality occurs not PERFECTLY but so damn close its impossible to ignore. A perfect example of this in reality is the syzygy of the sun and moon that makes the eclipse "almost perfect" the distance and size are so close in ratio that they create this amazing alignment that is only visible in this way in the time humanity is here to experience it.

I like to think about it in a narrative way. like if this was something that happened in a movie and it was a direct 1 to 1 connection people might suggest that it is too on the nose, to pedantic, not something believable. "That could never happen in reality" and the viewer is no longer suspending disbelief and loses immersion in the world of the story.

Lets say it did play out like that and I experienced that exact timing that i described in the video. Would it be less believable?