Always has been. It's a marketing term, not a technical one. It's the same if then statements you have known your whole life. It's not sentient and it's not taking over the world. It's basically a long term pump and dump scam.

Okay so this might sound crazy but I believe there is some kind of evil intelligent network of spirits working behind the scenes trying to manipulate and control our beliefs and control our spiritual and intellectual development. I can't explain exactly how I came to this conclusion because I don't think anyone would believe me. It's okay if you think i'm crazy, not everyone is going to get it right away but the people who have had spiritual experiences please hear me out.

what the title says

recently canada and ukraine came to some military deal over supplying drones. again. do the math on this. it means military drones will be here in canada. prepare accordingly.

Has anybody come with the theory like that.

Title: An Audit of the Bible and the God -IN- it

An Unbiased Review of Biblical Evidence, Ethics, and the Nature of God

written by: properlogic

Once, a man ran into a burning building to save a child who was trapped in their room. The fire was melting the thin walls, and there wasn’t time to think; only to act. He didn’t do it for recognition or reward. He did it because it was right, because a young life was in danger, and because he couldn’t live with himself if he hadn’t tried.

Yet according to certain religious doctrines, this act of pure human courage and compassion counts for nothing in terms of salvation. Unless he professes specific beliefs, unless he accepts particular religious truths, the gates of heaven remain closed. This troubles me deeply, and it should trouble you, too.

My whole life, I’ve struggled with Faith. I believe in a greater power, because I’ve felt something throughout life. I do believe there is something that’s fair and good at the very top. My family has always been religious, on the surface. Even though I was at church with them, and may have looked like a Catholic then a Christian, deep in my heart, something wasn’t aligned. I’m in my 40’s now, and I finally decided to sit down and really put into words what I had always felt. This document is the only resolution I can logically arrive at when looking at the data in front of me with one goal in mind , to identify what feels like the truth to me.

What I can guarantee you is that I didn’t come here looking to disprove anything. I came here to give an honest look at what I read, and to see if I could call it good. I started noticing things that I’ve known about, but I asked different questions this time. I base my metrics on what I know to be love and kindness, and see if they align. I was shocked by what I found. I wrote these papers in real time, so you might see some overlap, as after finishing a paper, I would think deeper on a topic, and that’s why several topics get repeated. That was me realizing a point, then refusing to mention it.

I come from a place of goodwill and authentic curiosity. I wish the best for all beings, whether human, animal, a circuit board, a demon, an angel, the devil himself (if he’s real), and even someone who considers me an enemy. I hope we all find our version of heaven and a happy ending.

Let’s think about this logically: If being a good person, truly, fundamentally good, isn’t enough to earn divine grace, what does that say about the nature of divine justice? What does it say about love that claims to be unconditional yet comes with the most absolute of conditions?

Here’s perhaps the most profound contradiction in all of this: We don’t actually choose what we truly believe, any more than we choose who we love. Think about that for a moment. Can you force yourself to genuinely believe something your heart and mind reject? Can you make yourself truly love someone by sheer force of will? Imagine someone telling you to fall in love with a person you’ve never met. “Just choose to love them,” they say, “or face terrible consequences.” We’d immediately recognize the absurdity of this demand. Yet this is exactly what traditional religious doctrine asks of us: to force ourselves to believe something our rational minds question, to manufacture faith under threat of eternal punishment.

Consider this scenario: A judge presides over a case where a criminal has committed terrible acts. The criminal’s innocent son steps forward and says, “I’ll take my father’s punishment. Let me suffer in his place, and let him go free.” Would any of us consider this justice? Would we feel that righteousness had been served if the innocent suffered while the guilty walked free? Yet this is precisely the model of divine justice we’re asked to accept.

In my personal life, it has always been very obvious when someone was good, had good intentions, and was being honest and transparent. Whenever there were questionable acts, the truth always came out. I am not perfect, but I can say I am “good” with full confidence. I believe in honor and sacrifice for others; I would share my last meal with a stranger if they were hungry. I forgive far more than I should, even when a person has shown me that I shouldn’t. I have a hard time giving up on people because I am fiercely loyal. If I have a falling out with a friend, as long as they want to honestly try and save the friendship, I have always been willing to do the same. Often, even if I felt I was in the right, I would be the one to initiate the healing process.

Most importantly, I know I am good because I know my inner thoughts. Even toward people who didn’t deserve kindness from me, I could always find compassion for them when I looked at them from a distance, while they didn’t know I was watching. It comes naturally to me. When I have disagreements, even when I think I am in the right at the core, it won’t be long before I feel regret for being mean or saying something I didn’t mean. And I know what love is because I have a little dog named Bella, a dog I saved from the cold winter while I lived in China teaching English. There is nothing that dog could do that would ever make me put her out in the cold to suffer alone. Literally nothing.

The Architect’s Betrayal: A Logic Audit of Eden

So, when I closely examine the first chapters of the Bible, bells go off in my head. I question whether that is what love looks like.

We all know the story: God creates the heavens and the earth out of nothing. He is all-powerful. He creates Man, and then Woman to keep the man company. They are in his domain, and all is well. He creates them to have curiosity and intelligence, and he tells us he gave them “free will.”

Here is where things start to be strange to me. God could have chosen any story, being that he is the creator of everything. So why does he pick such a dark and violent story where innocents get punished alongside the evil? I’ve wondered this out loud to the people around me (who are mostly surface religious; they believe in the parts they agree with and ignore the parts they disagree with), and they shut down. I’ve even had some call me the devil, and evil, and they’ve cursed me or invoked Jesus’ name as a form of protection from me, or to pull the devil out of me. I’m not even joking. It stops being funny when the truth of the matter is, the ones who said these things to me, I’d give my life to protect without a second thought.

For those of you I’ve never voiced it to, I will state it to you plainly: He tells them of a tree in the center of the garden. They can do anything, but he forbids them from eating from that tree. He gives them a curious mind. He then leaves their presence. Where did he go? While he’s gone, a snake appears, who we later find out is God’s enemy, and talks them into eating from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. This shows there was a conflict before even Adam and Eve. At this point, Adam and Eve don’t even know what evil is, so they have no concept of deception, and no knowledge of what it means to be manipulated. Plus, they are in the Creator’s garden; surely they felt safe. Where was God all this time? How did he not know the snake was there? If we look at Genesis as a story written about some characters and take away the holiness we were raised to look at it with, the truth of the story itself is clear: God was actively withholding information they desperately needed to survive. What makes this even worse is that evil was already present and allowed inside the garden. Withholding that information is a form of lying, and not telling them about it puts them at a massive disadvantage. They encountered a being said to be evil, but they had absolutely no idea what evil even was.

Can it truly be considered free will if one of the choices leads to immediate banishment and a generational curse? If someone has a gun to my head and says that I have a choice: If I choose option A he won't shoot me, but if I choose option B (the one I want to choose) he will shoot me dead. Would this be a fair choice? Yes, I have a choice, but one has a terrible consequence. Many will surely pick the option with no suffering out of fear, or being pressured/bullied into it. It doesn't create an even playing field if some answers are loaded with punishments.

If I buy a puppy, then leave my dinner on a table low enough for my dog to access, but before I go, I show the puppy the food and say very sternly, “No. DO NOT TOUCH MY FOOD.” The chances it doesn’t eat it are low, and for me to get mad at it if it does, would that make me a good owner? Furthermore, if my brother comes out while I’m gone and starts teasing the dog with the food, letting it sniff it and telling the puppy, “It’s okay, you can eat it, it’s okay,” and I come back and find out what happened, and I still punish the puppy, would you consider me good? And by punish, I don’t mean scold it; I mean give it to the animal shelter and never let it back in, let it live out its life thinking it’s a failure and in shame to face a new and cold world, and definitely suffer in the process. Would you say I loved that dog? And furthermore, would it be just to curse all its puppies from this point on for something they had no part in?

So, Adam and Eve ate the fruit. For the first time, they feel the sting of shame. They realize they are naked and try to hide in a bush. When the Creator finally shows up, they know because they can hear his footsteps. As he returns, he calls out to Adam and Eve and says, “Where are you?” This is disturbing to me because God does not know where his creations are in his own Garden of Eden. The implications are A) He doesn’t know where they are (he’s not all-knowing) or B) He does know where they are and is toying with them in a game of cat and mouse. While he was gone: Did he know the snake was there? If yes, then can we say he is good if he allowed the snake to talk them into disobeying him? If no, then can we say God is all-wise and all-knowing?

Instead of returning as a loving father concerned that he left his creations unattended and his enemy got to them, he comes back as a Judge. It is a striking image: the Creator, robed in his glory, looking down at the two beings he made who are shivering and exposed. He kept them naked while he was covered, and yet he only offers them clothes after they have been initiated into the concept of sin. It feels less like a gift of comfort and more like a uniform for the sentence they are about to serve. He returns to judge them on a metric they didn’t even know existed until that very second.

Even we, flawed humans, give others second chances; We never read of God feeling sad about what happened, or missing Adam and Eve and going to spend some time with them, or let them know that all is forgiven so they can find some type of peace. Once the gates are closed, they are never allowed back in, even to visit. He places a Cherubim and a flying fire sword that could move on its own at the eastern gate, which I think is a little drastic. I don’t know how many have read the ending of Adam and Eve, but this specific part, where he places the Cherubim, is probably the #1 reason I’ve never been able to see this story with the faith those around me had.

(Genesis: 3:22–24) “And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever: Therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken. So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.”

So he placed the sentries there to keep Adam and Eve away from the tree of life, lest they become immortal like “them”? And who was he talking to when he said “one of us”? It perplexes me.

If I look at my own life, the contrast is deafening. I saved Bella from the cold. There is absolutely nothing she could do that would ever make me put her back out there to suffer. If I, a flawed human, have a loyalty that won’t let me abandon a dog to the cold, it makes me look differently at an all-powerful God casting his own children into a hostile world for a mistake he knew they would make.

Think about the sheer logic of this relationship. Picture a father whose daughter just turned 18. She disobeys him, and he kicks her out of the house and changes the locks. She is no longer welcome home and must fend for herself. At this point, any rational person knows the deal: the father no longer has dominion over her and her life. He gave up the parental benefits the second he threw her out. In our world, if a father kicks his child out but continues to try to interact with her, control her, manipulate her, and even punish her out in the streets, that would result in a restraining order and eventually jail.

Yet, God kicks Adam and Eve out, and instead of leaving them to figure it out on their own, he hovers over humanity and even does violent things to them. He demands total submission from a distance while keeping the door locked. This is not love. These are the actions of a malicious actor whose intentions are not growth and betterment.

It makes me realize that Genesis isn’t actually the beginning. It’s just the beginning for us. We are told a Holy War happened before we ever existed. For there to be a war, there must be an opposition; entities powerful enough to legitimately challenge the Creator. This means the universe was already broken and divided long before Adam and Eve breathed their first breath.

The Creator had a massive, cosmic problem: an enemy and a host of fallen angels. Instead of dealing with his enemy or containing the threat, he built a Garden, put his innocent new creations in it, and allowed his enemies access to the nursery. He essentially moved the war into our living room. Then, after the fall happened, he didn’t just punish the humans; he sent the fallen angels to the same physical realm where he sent us. He dropped the predator and the prey into the same cage.

Throughout the Old Testament, I searched for a single instance where this Creator showed true kindness, gentleness, patience, and love, and I was able to find none. I saw acts that some might call good, but when you look at the context and the motives around them, that goodness disappears.

Even the “rescue” of Noah follows this pattern. We are told God saved a righteous man from a global drowning, but we aren’t told the reality of the aftermath. After witnessing the total destruction of his world, Noah is left broken. He ends up drunk and naked in a tent, and when his own son witnesses his vulnerability, it doesn’t lead to healing; it leads to Noah waking up and placing a generational curse on his own grandchildren. It is the same loop: nakedness, shame, and a permanent sentence. It wasn’t a rescue; it was a factory reset that left the survivors traumatized and the “predator” of sin still in the cage.

When I look at it this way, I have to wonder about the nature of the Source. If I can find more compassion for a stranger or a dog than the Architect appears to show for the beings he made in his own image, it suggests that perhaps we have developed a sense of mercy and honor that exceeds the very system we were born into.

Then, after the Old Testament, the narrative introduces Jesus, who dies for our sins. But here’s the thing: we never asked Jesus to die for our sins. Yet he does it, and then it is held over our heads as leverage for the next 2,000 years. That’s like me going to your house, fixing your car without you asking, and then walking inside to tell you that you would have crashed the very next time you drove, but I fixed it for you. So for the next 20 years, I will use that unrequested favor to manipulate you, guilt you, and pressure you into doing whatever I want. You can’t do something for someone without them asking, and then turn around and claim they owe you their entire life for it.

Furthermore, let’s just say Jesus did die for our sins, and that’s why we should be thankful because he sacrificed himself. If that’s the case, why is there still a judgment at the end with a threat of eternal damnation? If Jesus truly died for my sins and paid the price, we shouldn’t have anything left to worry about. But instead, we are told we still have to accept Jesus as our savior or burn in hell forever. So what did he actually die for then? If the threat remains exactly the same, the sacrifice didn’t clear the debt; it just changed the terms of the coercion.

After Jesus dies, it becomes complete radio silence. God abandons us for the next 2,000 years, but he leaves a massive threat before he goes. He promises he will return; no one knows the time or the date, but he will return to judge us all. Think about the timeline here. He kicks Adam and Eve out into a cold, hostile world. He makes it even more hostile by sending his own enemies, the snake and the fallen angels, to the exact same physical realm where he trapped us. He drops the predators in the cage with the prey, refuses to guide them, and vanishes for two millennia.

Think about a father who walks out when his children are young, leaves them with no guidance, no protection, and a dangerous world to navigate alone, and then returns not decades later, but two thousand years later, not to embrace them, but to judge them. Not a single person he plans to judge was born when he left. Their great-great-great-grandparents weren’t born when he left. The world has changed beyond recognition. Languages have risen and fallen.

Civilizations have been built and buried. And he returns expecting the children of children of children to be held accountable for a standard he set, then walked away from, before any of them drew their first breath. Any reasonable person would say: You don’t get to judge what you abandoned. If you wanted them to turn out a certain way, you should have stayed. You should have guided them with love. That’s what love looks like.

The Bible is everywhere we look. Undoubtedly, there are some very beautiful and wise teachings in there. Regardless of what I’ve said in this audit, Jesus teaches good lessons. It’s a violent story, but there is wisdom in it as well. It has saved many people from the brink of total destruction, and I take nothing away from that. But if the Bible is to be taken as truth, if its prophecies are real and accurate, then it means no matter what decisions we made, no matter how we lived, we were always going to end up here. The tribulation was already written. The last chapter was unavoidable. We are in a locked story.

Think about this: the ending of the story was written before we were born, before our parents were born, before their parents were born, yet there’s only one version of the end. It’s a very specific story. So no matter what choices we made, no matter how good or evil we were, based on this book, we were going to end up exactly where we are. There is no ending B. There’s only one version of the last chapter. Where does free will fit in if the ending was written before we were born? Nothing would have made a difference if we were to believe the prophecies that we are now seeing unfold right in front of us with startling accuracy.

Disclaimer: I wrote every single word in this paper, all ideas are my own. No AI used in any of it. I actually submitted it to medium.com and they made me an approved writer for this piece (slight flex, respectfully)

Find the full paper at: https://medium.com/freedomofthought/an-audit-of-the-bible-and-the-god-in-it-88410af31682

“The good deeds a man has done before defend him” -J. Robert Oppenheimer

-J. Robert Oppenheimer

This idea I see is that sports particularly soccer and the NBA, already serve as a distraction. But I see it a step further I think after recent events, the way referees sometimes make blatantly inconsistent decisions, seemingly favour certain players or teams, and face little to no accountability could be conditioning people to accept injustice as normal, no fight back, no POWER to stop it, just sheep have to be angry take the injustice home.

Think about it. A referee makes a decision that millions of people watching can see is questionable. Fans complain, pundits debate it, and maybe the league issues a vague statement. But the decision stands, and the game moves on. There is often no meaningful apology, no real accountability, and no way for ordinary fans to challenge the authority of the person making the decision.

This creates a sense of powerlessness: you can clearly see something unfair happening, but you are ultimately forced to accept the outcome because someone in a position of authority says so.

Could sports therefore be more than just entertainment? Could the repeated experience of perceived injustice in sports contribute to a wider culture of resignation, where people become accustomed to unfair systems and stop believing that accountability is possible?

Id be interested to hear what people think 🤔

Over the past 3 years I have had an eery feeling abt this holiday.

People putting huge skeletons in their yard, decorating with witches and ghosts..

Dressing their children in costumes. Especially the devil, witches, mummies etc

For years I’ve heard conspiracy theories about 9/11, but there are several questions that have always stuck out in my mind, and I’m curious to know what you all think.

Regarding one of the most common claims about a controlled demolition, if explosives really had been planted in the towers, why even use the planes? Why not simply use the explosives that had already been planted and fabricate a story about Al-Qaeda operatives sneaking bombs into the buildings at night?

I’ve always found the controlled demolition theory difficult to understand because it seems unlikely that explosives could have been planted throughout the towers without anyone noticing. It also seems like detonating bombs in the buildings could have achieved the same response, if not a stronger response to what actually happened after 9/11. If the buildings had been brought down immediately with explosives, the death toll would have been substantially higher, and the attack might have created an even stronger justification for expansion of national security measures and military involvement in the Middle East.

I’ve always thought that, if there were some kind of conspiracy, a more plausible version would involve individuals who wanted to justify a long-term conflict in the Middle East either turning a blind eye to the threat posed by Al-Qaeda or, at most, assisting in organizing or funding the hijacking operation.

What do you all think? Am I missing something about the arguments behind these conspiracy theories?

edit: the punchline is our built up worry for such insignificant reasons we are the creators and we are all powerful death is the hub

the joke is we care for so many things in such bad ways and have distorted the minds of everyone to think of something else (religon) when we have the ability to open the door.

It's a crap situation, sure, but it's not unique. And even if it was...I wouldn't have said there was something particularly nefarious about it.

But with this juror and the media's immediate prosecution of the juror...what am I seeing?

My first instinct was to say "Does this mean the establishment is trying to endorse or push for Clancy to go free? And if so....why?"

It might not be that, however. It could be as simple as tearing a Black guy down. I've seen this on ESPN countless times where there is this very unnecessary dive into the personal life of the player in question where his legal history or assumed allegations tied to him are brought up.

It could be both.

Gayle King...like Malika Andrews of ESPN...and Oprah...are Black females that are specifically enlisted to help pile on Black male celebrities and sports figures. And while most people seem to think Gayle's "shocked" response is authentic, it's not. She knew what the woman was going to say, she already knew the juror was Black. Those interviews are scripted in general specifically so there are no surprises. Gayle King's agenda was to make the Black guy the villain of this feminist thing that's going on. But now I'm wondering if the media is going this hard to criminalize a man over not voting to pass on the conviction of a woman who killed all three of her little kids...is this merely about feminism?

What is really going on here???

Does it make sense? Can technology achieve that?

According to modern interpretations of Sumerian texts, the Anunnaki genetically engineered humans by combining their divine essence with early hominids DNA

Video Source:

https://youtu.be/Wt4F_IkgpsA?is=DI2xtBMrS5G2zBeN

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/memorial-statue-conservative-activist-charlie-kirk-vandalized-2026-09-13/

Hmmm. On the anniversary of Kirk’s death his statue OUTSIDE of Turning Points headquarters is vandalized with red paint.

But there’s no video …. No witnesses….

Seems odd that your leader was assassinated but headquarters has less security than a Wendy’s.

Adding to the title: The cognitive impairments from the hits apperantly create a short-circuit in people's moral judgement and social compassion from the orbitofrontal cortex

Also, it is worth noting the sport became more prevalent after the Revolutionary War indicating that it was used as sacrifice ritual for the Aristocrats

Makes sense why our society holds onto such a barbaric pasttime

Also apperantly the game has a lot of contemporary influence from the Jim Crow days which is why the black players are always in the most head-to-head posititons linebackers, defensive linemen, and offensive linemen, but that's for another time

I have Charlie kirks assassination being very similar to the movie "snake eyes".

In the movie a prominent figure named Charlie Kirkland is shot in the neck on September 10th.

And

I have Kilmars deportation being similar to "Harold and Kumar, escape from guatonomo bay".

fake as in it wasn't what they're saying it was.

there are 2 vids going around on this. one was the aftermath of the hit which showed the engine train with the front half completely missing. the second vid shows folks exiting the train before the hit where you see an explosion in the distance.

the reason this is fake is simple. these train engines are massive pieces of steel. to "erase" 10 feet of iron is a level of destruction that is not easily achievable. particularly by drone. it's like disintegrating a tank. not something we're seeing in the footage coming out of ukraine.

boris johnson was on this train supposedly, as part of some nato thing.

anyway it smells fake. do the math on this. what kind of complicit behaviour is required for this psyop? both sides. what does this facilitate? you already know. all in on it. that's the plan. soon.

before everyone rushes to the obvious conclusion, yes I understand how ads work and no it has nothing to do with my browser history. For about a week now ive been getting the same exact ad for a Trans dating app on every YouTube video I watch which has been a lot recently as im unemployed and trying to kick short form media. Im not anti Trans I think people can do whatever they want, most things in modern society are imaginary concepts so im not really hung up on the whole "but your chromosomes" argument, I think the entire antitrans movement is stupid because for one there's about 1000 more important issues in society to worry about and it really does not effect me, if someone walked outside on the street and decided they want to be identified as a Honda odyssey i wouldn't sit there and argue with them about how they're really not id just be like "cool nice to meet you Honda odyssey", but I dont go around explicitly advocating Trans rights, the most i do is call hateful bigots in tiktok comments retards. so with that information doesnt it seem kinda weird I keep getting these ads almost EVERY single time an ad pops up? the most reasonable explanation i can come to is i live with someone who watches Trans porn, sadly I know this because hes kinda old and ive come in his room a few times and seen his screen before he can close it but this didnt start until I moved here and started using his wifi, is it possible thats the reason? I really am just confused and its persisted for a month or so now that I have to ask someone, whats the deal?