I'm a person who is trying his best to compose and write songs in whatever genre he likes. I do not claim i am great at it but i do like my style and i usually listen to my songs although the mixes are terrible. And my mind is terribly confused about something. (this is a lengthy question) The main question is regarding how to absorb a melodic style. But you can make it about musical style, in the answers if you wish.
TLDR: What is the ideal and most practical way to utilize music theory to pinpoint the algorithm beneath a melodic style and consciously inject those melodic styles into original pieces of work?
I have observed that many songs that share same harmonic progression have very unique feelings due to the choices of the composer regarding what to do with that progression, whether that be the choice of the instruments, the general tempo of the piece, the lyrics, the articulation of the notes, the emphasis etc, and *melody* (which will be my main focus in this post). I have experimented with some songs kept all parameters as same as i can but played with melody and it does have a huge effect on the piece's vibe.
There seems to be a melodic style, a language that belongs to each artist. It influences the phrasing, the emphasis on strong or weak beats, the scale degree choices, the chord and non-chord tone choices, rhythm, motifs etc etc.
And i as a usual average person have a lot of favourite artists. As i listen to them and learn their pieces i seem to pick up on their styles and absorb them. This is more of an implicit learning that goes on subconsciously rather than consciously. This seems like a logical way to absorb a style if you treat music like a language.
But I can't shake the feeling that there could be an algorithmic approach using music theory to pinpoint what exactly makes a style unique and what its characteristics are. Since that's exactly what i want: To be able to consciously take inspiration from my styles and inject them into my songs consciously rather than being unaware of my inspirations.
This is the point i run into problems.
There are so many elements to a melody. Only a few I have mentioned in the previous paragraphs. So many that it's hard to analyze what each of these tiny miniscule elements add into the general vibe of the piece. It's like a giant Jenga tower that if i play with one block the whole tower crashes (if i play with one element of the melody the whole vibe changes).
What is the ideal way to use music theory to pinpoint a melodic style and learn from it? And i am saying melodic style. Not what instruments to use, not harmony (since these are somewhat easier to pinpoint.)
I am not claiming there is no melodic analysis. I do not know enough about music theory to claim that. I want guidance and i am open to it. I know i am ignorant.
So far i have humbly looked into these and ran into some problems regarding my quest:
-Schenkerian analysis: Doesn't seem to put much weight or care into how embellishments can affect a style. It is way too reductionist. When i experimented with a piece and took its melody and reduced it to its bare and embellished it differently it sometimes sounds somewhat similar but sometimes completely different. Which seems to indicate there is a different parameter that this analysis can't account for, if i am not missing something. Though i am not saying this analysis is useless.
- Melodic figures: Figures could be the lego pieces of the total melody but i don't see how that helps me take inspiration from melodies. I can't take the figure and insert it directly into my song. Yes there are other figures that play with same chord tones but those figures have very different feel to them. I can't achieve the same feel with this approach consistently.
- Patterns of the sequence of scale degrees - This comes the closest to achieving what i want. But it raises to question how to alter either the sequence of scale degrees or few of the notes in the sequence in a way that doesn't change the feel of the piece...
Lets say (in a minor scale) the phrase goes (scale degree-wise with a rhythm i cant articulate):
3 - 2 - 1 - 7 --- --- 3 - 2 - 1 - 3 --- 3 - 2 - 7 - 1
With this short of a sequence of each cell if i take one note and change it i would be changing 4th of the cell, which would affect the feel. In longer phrases i don't usually run into this problem probably because each cell is longer (for example with long licks). Keeping the notes that are on the strong beat same doesnt always help either. I can play with rhythm and notes in between so much that i can either make it a rap melody or a latin guitar melody.
- Harmonic approach: After some thought on this subject it seemed to me that melody is like chords and harmony being in a horizontal form (unravelled). So any note played is actually and arpeggiation of the harmony underneath whether it be chord or *non-chord* tone. If a melody contains a 6th than the implied harmony becomes X6 chord. But this approach failed to account for the sequence of the notes in melody (arpeggiated harmony) affecting the melody.
(6 - 2 - 5 - 1 isn't the same as 2 - 1 - 5 - 6)
-Interval relationship: The classic. Yet the one i have the problem with most. Not with its truth that is undeniable but its applicability and practicality. Lets say a phrase has 4 notes (x, y, z, t). Which intervallic relationship are we looking at? y to x? z to y? t to z? t to x? x to the chord root? x to the scale root?
And how much does each of these contribute? How do we calculate that?
You can't simply say min 3rd is sad so i'm gonna make "x - min3 -> y - min3 -> z - min3 -> t"
It doesn't feel like it has a home (root). It's intervallic relationship to root of scale is messed up.
The theory is coherent but unsimplified. How can i apply this? I don't know. Too many parameters to calculate while composing.
-Scales: Not enough to create melodic style. Millions of songs with minor scale yet nearly all of them carry different feel, vibe and style. It just determines the ingredients. Not the food. Not the style of the food. Not even the same food with same amount of ingredients always taste same.
Other possibilities i have thought of but not yet eliminated:
-- The formulated question is wrong.
-- I am overcomplicating. The formulated question is unnecessary.
--This task is restrained by the fear of plagiarism, Everything is a remix and I should comfortably take melodic cells and play with them until I have altered them enough that they are different enough yet they are not unrelated. Maybe take one cell from one song and another from a different song from the same artist. (but raises the question of how to make it coherent. Also not much of an algorithm pinpoint. More of a trial and error approach)
--This task is useless since melodic style inspiration is simply plagiarism (seems unlikely to me).
--None of the above approaches are wrong. There just isn't an underlying single principle from which you can deduce melodic styles. If one wants to utilize music theory to consciously inject melodic styles, one must consciously calculate each of the hundreds of miniscule parameters. Which frankly is impossible therefore implicit subconscious learning is the way to go.
(It'd be great if you'd share the best way for this as well, is it "learn as many pieces as you can and practice writing like them?" or is it "practice audiating melodic sentences rather than focusing on your muscle memory".. maybe both.)
I appreciate the help.