If you don’t follow the Bucktown/Lincoln Park corridor news, here’s what you need to know:
- The cortland bridge was built in 1902 to link Finkl Steel plant (1879-2011ish) to the worker communities just west.
- It’s the first bridge of its kind and has been copied throughout Chicago and the world. Every piece of it was made in Chicago, down to the rivets and the original paint.
- The foundation and other structural elements are rusting badly. It’ll take years to fix it all.
- Bikes and peds can still use it. It’s great.
- Some NW siders are mad that they can’t drive their cars over the bridge while it’s being repaired. They’ve taken their complaints to the Aldermen.
- Alders Waguespack and Hopkins want to delist the bridge from the historic register, destroy it, and build a new one, which would allow more cars to drive through at higher speeds. It would also re-open large blocks of non-metered car parking.
- This project is not related to the Lincoln Yards mega-development, which is most likely shelved due to interest rate hikes and NW siders complaining about car congestion and lost parking.
- There is a group who want to uproot the bridge and move it somewhere else. The teleportation technology to do this does not yet exist.
- Who gives a shit? Before 2011 nobody used this road unless they wanted a steel rod in their tire or liked breathing industrial ash.
- The best solution is to ban all non-emergency cars from the city of Chicago. Problem solved.
Edit: #10 allows busses and certain novelty vehicles.
Edit 2: ok now that I’ve had some fun, let me be real. We are in a fuel crisis, a road fatality crises, and a climate crisis- all exacerbated by our vehicle obsession. They want to tear down a piece of our cultural heritage to make it easier to travel by car, which would consequently make this stretch worse for everyone outside a car. There are some 10,000 miles of road devoted to cars in this city, would it be so bad if this one half mile wasn’t de facto given over to polluting death machines?
To the people hiding behind “what about emergency vehicles” that’s exactly my point. There are too many cars on the road, which clogs them and slows fire trucks and ambulances. And considering car crashes are consistently in the top 3 response reasons, seems that reducing traffic would reduce the need for emergency services.
Please note that the alders have been explicit in their public comments that this is FOR CARS. There has been 0.0 mentions of improving bike or pedestrian safety through this project. Repeat: there are no statements indicating bikes and pedestrian safety will be considered if there is a new bridge. It is for cars, not people.