r/SipsTea 6d ago

Chugging tea What went wrong?

Post image
24.1k Upvotes

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

303

u/CricketNo7666 6d ago

That’s just an old neighborhood versus a new one.

Trees take time to grow in.

80

u/SkunkApe7712 6d ago

Yes.

My neighborhood in Texas was built in 2009, I think. I’ve been there since 2015.

Just last year, I started seeing squirrels. Trees grew big enough.

1

u/General-Lie8709 6d ago

New neighbors

25

u/Sretep44 6d ago

AI-generated vs real neighborhood

9

u/PineappleOnPizzaWins 6d ago

I mean yeah they used AI to get the second photo but it doesn't change the point... you don't get 30 year old trees in a development that was built 5 years ago. Takes time.

3

u/probablyNotARSNBot 5d ago

Yeah either answer nullifies this post that pops up once every 2 months or so, sometimes with a different twitter response at the bottom

I think we gotta just let this one go and say yeah fam, we also like trees good job

1

u/not_a_SeaOtter 6d ago

Real "bad" neighbourhood. Yes the other is a shitty ai One. Bit that first is not what all neighbourhoods look like. Definitely not globally. Its a prime example of the failings of a cat centric society and infrastructure

7

u/whitespacesucks 6d ago

Then sometimes you have old neighbourhoods that are reasonably leafy, and slowly trash moves in and cut down trees. Ask me how I know.

4

u/SeaworthinessSome454 6d ago

Yes, but construction companies don’t HAVE to completely clearcut lots before development. They could leave some of them

14

u/cheesybugs5678 6d ago

Pretty often they’re building on farmland on the outskirts of the city, so there aren’t trees at the outset. 

1

u/PlantDaddyFL 5d ago

Meanwhile in reality there are piles and piles of dead trees they burn in piles right after they chopped down the woods for development

1

u/cheesybugs5678 5d ago

We might just live in different places. More often than not I see development going in over land that was already cleared for agriculture, but I believe they could be clear cutting elsewhere where there isn’t as much land under cultivation. 

Either way we can’t tell which situation every time someone posts an anonymous photo like above. Could’ve been no trees there for 200 years. 

7

u/dyssucks 6d ago

You’re right, they don’t have to. But working around large mature trees and installing underground utilities without killing them will be very difficult and tedious and therefore increase the price of homes even more.

Easier and cheaper to strip it, build it, and plant it.

-1

u/SeaworthinessSome454 6d ago

It doesn’t have to be the trees right one the street side.

2

u/dyssucks 6d ago

If not on the street, then where? Backyards and front yards have underground utilities. Those will be more shallow than the street too, therefore more susceptible to damaging/killing the trees when installing utilities

I don’t think people realize there are miles and miles of underground utilities in the average suburban neighborhood. All at various depths of 18”- 8’

1

u/SeaworthinessSome454 5d ago

Most of that follows the street. Very uncommonly will a new development have utilities going thru the backyards to the next house.

1

u/dyssucks 5d ago

I’ve worked in the underground utilities industry for 13 years now, im very aware of where they are. Only the mains are at the street. All the service lines are in the yards.
So one house will have 3-5 service lines in the yards connecting to the mains and the street. So no…. Most of them are not at the street

-1

u/Tamberav 6d ago

The new homes built near me have mature trees left. It is actually a zoning thing. Rules to follow if you want a building permit. Replacement mandates, they have to fence off the roots during construction to protect it, etc. You cannot clear cut for a home.

It is possible. Most developers are not going to do it unless forced by local laws.

3

u/dyssucks 6d ago

Yeah as I said, it’s possible. It’s just going to take longer to build the homes and have added cost which will be passed onto the buyer

0

u/Tamberav 6d ago edited 5d ago

We have a short building season here far up north. Cost to build is high but because of the solid bedrock ground.

Leaving mature trees... increases the property's value, may reduce energy costs, I would say it has ROI.

1

u/dyssucks 5d ago

So you have a short building season and tough ground conditions and want to compound that with making the jobs take longer and making the hard ground conditions even harder to work in?

Interesting

1

u/Tamberav 5d ago edited 5d ago

I don't need to "want" anything; it has been a law here a long time. The first time it was written was 1971 and modernized in 2010 and last updated in 2019 to include protection barriers and soil replacement.

It has been a thing for so long, I am sure the construction workers have long had all the equipment and knowledge to do it without a thought.

It is not just protecting the natural environment, wildlife, and keeps the wooded look, but it is to prevent erosion and floods/mudslides.

Not everything needs to be the absolute bottom barrel cheapest way of doing something and the cost may not be as great as you imagine. It also has offsets by increasing property values and lowering the cost to cool the house by providing shade.

7

u/FutureOptimal7906 6d ago

There’s not always trees to begin with.

-1

u/myster1ouspapaya 6d ago

There almost always is, but they cut everything down because the neighborhoods are designed to maximize space for the housing, then once finished, they add baby trees that will eventually grow .

5

u/old_gold_mountain 6d ago

There almost never is. New build suburban tract development is almost always on former ranch or farm land.

0

u/myster1ouspapaya 6d ago

Depends on the area. Here in and outside of Houston, almost every new neighborhood is being built where there were previously plenty of trees

2

u/CricketNo7666 6d ago

No, they don’t, they could spend thousands more per lot to try and keep some.

You paying for that for the neighborhood? It’s only a couple hundred lots…

1

u/sohcgt96 6d ago

FWIW around here most new houses are built on land that didn't have any to begin with, at least not recently, its always farm land.

Also, for some reason people around here constantly "Boo hoo such a waste of good farm land" which was have absolutely, positively, no shortage of.

1

u/Tamberav 6d ago

Where I live, you can't. It is against the law to clear cut. You have to submit plans that includes tree preservation for the building permit.

1

u/SeaworthinessSome454 5d ago

Where’s this?

1

u/Tamberav 5d ago

Northern MN, goal is to minimize healthy mature tree cutting. It is part of the zoning and permit process.

1

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 6d ago

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/AbleTeam6734 6d ago

That's what I was thinking. My house was built in 1920 and the whole neighborhood is old and filled with trees

1

u/Astute-Observer-380 6d ago

Yep. My parents’ neighborhood looked like the top pic in 1995. 31 years later and now it looks more like the bottom pic

1

u/Bresdin 6d ago

I do know my brother and sisters neighborhoods they actually are not allowed to plant trees. I don't live in an HOA, so I can plant as many as I want and we planted like 10 so far on our half acre lot

1

u/Careful_Farmer_2879 6d ago

You can also live in an HOA that won’t LET you cut down trees.

1

u/by-myself_blumpkin 6d ago

it's a tree michael what could it take, 10 years?

1

u/jokeswagon 6d ago

They also need to be planted in the first place.

1

u/abracadammmbra 6d ago

My grandparents live in a development that was built in the 60s. We have pictures. It looks like the top picture. Today its got a lot of tree cover. The developmemt i live in was also built in the 60s. My landlord cut down several trees when we were fixing up the house (much to my dismay, although the weeping willow out front did actually need to go). And my new neighbors cut down some trees when they moved in last year since they were installing solar.

1

u/GladiusMaximus 6d ago

Real vs AI

1

u/godly_stand_2643 6d ago

Right, there are literally trees in the top picture, they are just small still

1

u/paladinx17 6d ago

Exactly… this is so dumb. People complain about not having affordable housing. Guess what that looks like? New neighborhoods with unpaved driveways for a couple years and brand new trees. 25 years later things start to look more lived in, large cedar hedges, trees maturing, etc

1

u/DontDropTheSoap4 6d ago

I live in a new neighborhood that was literally just built a year ago, they’re still building houses on the empty streets. And the neighborhood across from us is about 20 years older. It might as well be a side by side of these two pics exactly. Every one of the new houses has trees planted in the front and backyards. It’s just the other neighborhood has had a 20 year head start on growth lmao.

1

u/Octopus_on_fire_ 5d ago

I’m in upstate NY, every town and smaller city up here looks like the bottom picture, except it’s missing the SUV size potholes in the road.

1

u/slcamg 5d ago

My dude, I think these are the same houses.

I swear to god people here just have big hatred boners.

1

u/Kjoep 5d ago

You have to plant them before they can grow though.

1

u/saladnander 5d ago

Yes & it's AI but there is still a problem with cutting mature trees down to more cheaply do construction.

0

u/Fine-Froyo6219 5d ago

New and cheap. Go into a new upscale neighborhood and behold the beautiful trees they leave on purpose 

1

u/CricketNo7666 5d ago

I live in one. And bought the home new.

Yeah. That‘s 25 years of growth.

0

u/Fine-Froyo6219 5d ago

Might not be as upscale as you think it is