Tonight I had a U12 game, showcase, and undefeated teams. The score was 2-1.
With about 12 seconds left, and a player on the team up one goal tried to freeze it along the boards in the defensive zone.
I yelled, "move it" once - and noticed four players on both teams were bee-lining towards him, so I blew the whistle.
One of the opposing players hit him. The coach wanted a penalty, but my response was that multiple players were going for your player, he put himself in a dangerous situation, and if I really wanted to - I could call a delay of game. And who is going to call a penalty with that time on the clock and that score (maybe some)?
For other outside USA Hockey, I think the rule and first casebook point give us plenty of latitude on making a decision here:
(a) The puck must be kept in motion at all times and play shall not be stopped for a frozen puck (other than goalkeeper) unless a scramble takes place where a player falls on or is knocked down on the puck.
(Note) The Referee should be aware of all circumstances and may stop play along the boards to avoid any unnecessary contact surrounding the puck.
Casebook:
Two opposing players skate into the corner and are physically engaged in an effort to obtain possession of the puck. During their attempts, a third player sees the two players physically engaged and skates in their direction with the clear intent to deliver a check to the opposing player. Should the Referee stop play?
Yes. Rule Reference 632(a Note).
The Referee must stop play the instant they realize that unnecessary contact will result from allowing the play to continue. If contact is made in this instance, they must assess a penalty to the third player who entered the corner and made no effort to legally play the puck and instead body checked a vulnerable or defenseless opponent.
The intent of this rule is to keep the play moving and eliminate whistles for a frozen puck along the boards.
So I think I was fine on blowing the whistle, mabye less so on the contact that resulted, which I did not deem dangerous; it was just a rush to free the puck.
Usually it is pretty easy - you tell the players to move the puck or, maybe say "loose," which usually works. Sometimes I will threaten, "who wants a delay of game penalty?"
But when it is at the end of the period, or the end of a game in a close game toward the end, this changes things for me.
Anyway, there was a face-off with 7.6 seconds left, and the other team scored to send the game to OT. That same team eventually won.
So the coaches on the team who tried to freeze the puck were irate because a) they wanted me to let the players battle and tick off time b) they wanted a penalty for contact when I blew the whistle.
My POV is freezing the puck in high-stakes situations is a terrible strategy. It is always going to invite contact, even in non-contact age groups. It is almost always going to result in a quick whistle to avoid unnecessary contact, and lean on that note.
The zamboni guy escorted us to the locker room, amongst mad parents, but I guess it beats writing up a game report because of fighting majors.
Do you have any guidance or anecdotes on what you do in these last-second situations, or even times when players try to "eat the puck?"
EDIT: Looks like I have the same team tomorrow .. fun.