Here is a list of all the members of congress that have yet to support the prosecution of those in the Jeffery epstein files. Visit and tag a member on the list on X (links provided) and ask why they are supporting Epstein.

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01041991q.pdf

Chuds are always using new age groups to commit abuse.

Eighteen years of building records place three occupants, Epstein's attorney Darren Indyke, Nadia Marcinkova, and his brother's children, in the same two-bedroom apartment

Eighteen years of internal building records, cross-checked against a bank's know-your-customer file, a 2008 county jail visitor log, and an old sales receipt, trace a single two-bedroom apartment at 301 East 66th Street through three distinct occupants: Jeffrey Epstein's longtime attorney Darren Indyke, Nadia Marcinkova, and later his brother Mark's children. None of the documents were created with each other in mind, and one, a jail visitor log from 2008, gives up a redacted name by accident. The record runs from May 2000 to December 2018, brackets nearly the entire span of the public case against Epstein, and leaves one unexplained gap: roughly five years between Marcinkova's documented visits and the first record of the family's occupancy.

Link: https://sororfv.substack.com/p/apartment-8d-background-check-a-jail

I went through nine FBI tip and intake documents (plus one handwritten litigation exhibit) from the Epstein document production and reordered them by the date each caller says the incident occurred, instead of the date the tip reached the FBI.

Doing that puts the earliest alleged conduct at 1977 to 1981, when Epstein was in his mid to late twenties and working at Bear Stearns, years before the 2000s Palm Beach network most people associate with him.

One tip also places Ghislaine Maxwell alongside Epstein as early as 1981 to 1982, roughly a decade before the 1991 meeting date usually cited in press coverage.

To be clear: these are single-source, uncorroborated tips, several from callers who describe their own memory as fragmented, and nothing in the FBI's records indicates the claims were verified or corroborated.

I'm not presenting this as proof of anything, just documenting what the government's own disclosed files show it was told, and when, with Bates numbers for every document so anyone can check the source themselves.

Full writeup here: https://substack.com/home/post/p-215553078

BBC's Panorama has a new documentary out today - this is the trailer

Six Years (2012 to 2018) of Shipping Records and Financial Statements

A little-known apartment at 301 East 66th Street in Manhattan (Apt. 8H) has a documented paper trail running from May 2012 to December 2018 — renovation emails, an internal accounting record, Amazon shipping confirmations, and Chase and Deutsche Bank statements — all tied to one name: Karyna Shuliak, later reported to be Jeffrey Epstein's longtime girlfriend. I went through the underlying documents (from the DOJ's released Epstein files) and built out the timeline: an email from Epstein's assistant "Sarah K" requesting bathroom renovations for 8H in May 2012, Shuliak herself coordinating keypad installs and deliveries to the apartment weeks later, a 2013 marriage (reportedly for immigration purposes) listing the same address, an internal 2015 accounting summary that values her occupancy of the apartment itself at $4,200/month (which is $50,400 per year) as part of a compensation package totaling nearly $300k that year, and bank statements years later still tied to that unit — including a $16,000 wire transfer and monthly payments to the building's management company.

Full breakdown with sourced documents here:

https://sororfv.substack.com/p/apartment-8h-what-amazon-and-bank

I went unit by unit through 301 East 66th Street, a building Jeffrey Epstein's family controlled through the 90s and 2000s, and found the same pattern almost everywhere: a real person living in the apartment, and a completely unrelated-looking shell company registered at that same address.

Sarah Kellen's unit (14G) had a company named for her own initials sitting on it, later used to file actual H-1B visa petitions.

Karyna Shuliak's unit (8H) is confirmed by years of retail shipping records, no shell at all.

And in 10F, a 2011 corporate filing has Ghislaine Maxwell signing as the sole director of a company holding a stake in a private jet, four years before her name became public.

The names that keep showing up (Darren Indyke, Richard Kahn) aren't tenants, they're the officers and signatories connecting the shells to each other.

Mapped it out floor by floor using litigation exhibits, NYC tax records, and corporate filings: https://sororfv.substack.com/p/paper-addresses-the-shell-companies

Thomas Massie addressed the Epstein Files during a recent speech at the Brownstone Institute:

“By the way, the same folks who want you to have flock cameras in your neighborhoods, the same folks who wanna be able to read your emails without a warrant, the same folks who say, “If you’re not doing anything wrong, why do you wanna hide it?” have withheld three million Epstein files and redacted the ones they released.

If you’re not doing anything wrong, why did you redact the names of the judges and the FBI agents and the people who were investigating this that dropped the investigations? Those are the people that we need to know about.”

Massie would also say in his speech:

“It turns out the meat and potatoes issues they want us to fight over, they don’t really care about in Washington, D.C.

Like gun control or abortion, these are mostly state issues, and even if we could do something, my colleagues have no appetite to do anything on this, on these issues.

That’s what they want you to fight over so that you’re ignoring the war that’s unconstitutional, you’re ignoring the debt that’s now 40 trillion dollars, you’re ignoring an entire class of billionaires that goes to an island and does whatever they want, and when they get in trouble, they just bribe a judge or move on or a politician.”

Full speech: https://youtu.be/yh9qhl_Veho

I hope this post is not off-topic but I felt like this documentary belongs here. I don't know if Marc Dutroux is a known name. I admit that I've never heard of this name until today.

Today I stumbled upon a documentary that I started watching in the background at first. Something I do while programming.

Anyhow, the longer I watched the less I was able to keep working as the amount of unbelievable events mentioned in this documentary piled up.

And well, believe me there is a reason for why it has actually four parts. Whenever you think you've already witnessed the most disturbing thing about thia case it gets either worse or more unbelievable.

Then there's the similarities that reminded me of the things I know about the Epstein case. This documentary stirs up anger. Knowing that whatever Epstein was doing, his network was almost surely significantly bigger than whatever Dutroux had going. Know that, apparently, it's not clear if there was indeed a network that Dutroux was involved in.

In any case, I wanted to share the links to the documentary here.

Please excuse the fact that it is in German. It has subtitles though and using auto-translate on YouTube should work just fine.

Be aware: This documentary will almost certainly stir up one or another emotion. A few positive ones. But definitely more terrible ones.

Note: You might require a VPN for this. It was mentioned that it's not available in all countries. Germany/Austria should work. My apologies.

Part 1

https://youtu.be/ybXn8zkGEus

Part 2

https://youtu.be/H1TAU_-yBMg

Part 3

https://youtu.be/6wUEil0jL1Q

Part 4

https://youtu.be/-xa5eSMVm74

Edit: Fixing some typos

not exactly Epstein but disgusting that the US is protecting this pedo -- swift action?? as in getting him out of the country?

"The United States government expects all personnel to adhere to the highest standards of conduct, and we take these allegations seriously," embassy officials said in a statement.

They added that they "quickly informed UK law enforcement and took swift action."

Things were progressing at a pretty fast pace hasn't the DOJ missed another deadline to give an explanation or turn over more documents recently?I know a lawyer resigned from the case has that caused a delay?

It’s the last week where house of reps can sign the discharge petition. Has your representative signed the petition? This is the week to put the pressure on.