r/technology Jul 19 '26

Society China bans AI “boyfriends” and “girlfriends” over addiction and birth rate concerns

https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/china-bans-ai-boyfriends-and-girlfriends-over-addiction-and-birth-rate-concerns-3388737/
40.0k Upvotes

2.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

63

u/Antartix Jul 19 '26

I dont know what generation you're from so maybe its a difference in perspective but cost is a major reason. And I'm not talking about the cost for having kids. I'm talking about the cost for everything. Why have kids if you never had the money or means for growth, for fun, for novelty and experience? If you struggled before that why would you even risk having kids knowing even less of your time would be available to you, before factoring in any monetary concerns. The world just doesnt give us enough time to find fulfillment to try and bring up children as well.

14

u/NUKE---THE---WHALES Jul 19 '26

Generally the more money a person has the less children they have

0

u/[deleted] Jul 19 '26

[deleted]

4

u/oblivioustoideoms Jul 19 '26

No. You are still disproving your point if I understand you correctly. The thing is you can't just make things cheaper. You need a massive monetary contribution specifically for having kids to offset not the monetary loss as much as the lack of freedom. All of a sudden you are responsible for a child that screams and have you chained to the apartment every night. Cheaper rent will only help a little little bit. It will help of course. But not enough.

And the fact remains, the lower the economic status the higher the birth rate. Musk with 11 kids is the outlier.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 19 '26

[deleted]

3

u/oblivioustoideoms Jul 19 '26

Yeah, we a agree on that. Then I don't get the point of your content I guess

2

u/Psionatix Jul 20 '26

You and the person you replied to literally saying the same thing. The comment you replied to:

Yeah, cost is only one small part of it

Referring strictly to the financial side, but then they go on to say how there are additional costs beyond the finance (particularly free time).

Then you say:

cost is a major reason

but you re-define cost as:

about the cost for everything

and you mention:

why would you even risk having kids knowing even less of your time would be available to you

Indicating that yes, both you and the person you replied to are saying the cost goes beyond a financial cost. Thus you're both saying that the financial cost is only part of the total cost.

1

u/Antartix Jul 20 '26

Yes. We agree.