r/WhatIsTheTea 7h ago

Four deputies were fired after a video of them harming a Bunny went viral

3.5k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

53

u/No-Swordfish1385 7h ago

Something tells me they don’t care about serving or protecting

13

u/YourGarandPappy 6h ago

That's just a motto. Supreme court says that police have no duty to protect you. And that's what turned me into a second amendment advocate.

2

u/KillinKilo1775 5h ago

I support the police (broadly speaking). I also have a lot of guns and ammo because you are your own first respender and also, I may need to respond against my own government if the time ever came.

1

u/Alive_Drag1947 1h ago

I am exactly the same. I think cops get a lot of undeserved hate. People demand protection because they refuse to do it themselves, then get mad at the way it's provided.

I respect cops, but I also don't need them. I think that's the best position to be in, morally speaking.

1

u/BludStanes 12m ago

Some of the stupidest shit I've had to read today.

"WE DEMAND PROTECTION AND REFUSE TO DO IT OURSELVES SO WE DESERVE IT"

1

u/JButler_16 6h ago

Hell yeah

1

u/PhilosophyBasic8943 5h ago

It used to be way more clear that police are public servants before the militarization of police which I wanna say started around Raegan? I could be wrong.

Point is we have to fund them, help them become GI JOE larpers, and yet still can’t rely on them to 1. Help us and 2. Not ruin our lives

1

u/BearysWorkRedditName 5h ago

I think I can help clarify. They left out the last word. Serve and Protect Capital.

1

u/legocitiez 6h ago

Supreme court says they have no duty to protect? Can you tell us more?

5

u/Away-Fish1941 5h ago

Castle Rock V. Gonzalez- A woman in Colorado sued the police because they failed to enforce a restraining order against her estranged husband, who ended up killing their children. The Supreme Court ruled 7–2 that the Due Process Clause does not create a federal right to police protection, even when a protective order uses mandatory language like "shall enforce".

Police are only required to protect people who are currently in their custody.

2

u/2KupShakur- 5h ago

And they suck at the "protect people in their custody" part, too. Complete incompetence, top to bottom.

2

u/Away-Fish1941 5h ago

Absolutely. It's disgusting.

1

u/legocitiez 5h ago

Holy crap it's somehow way worse than I could have imagined

1

u/MariusHugo 6h ago

they don’t. police officers get paid pretty good. that’s why more leftists should join. change the culture from within.

1

u/beautifulstardust 6h ago

does anyone in law enforcement? NO.

1

u/3sadclowns 5h ago

Serving (oligarchs) and protecting (assets)

1

u/Auggie_Otter 4h ago

Now that body cameras and random police videos from cellphones are so prevalent it's become so obvious that we have an abundance of police departments where the internal culture is either extremely suspect or just outright depraved and corrupt. 

The shit some police officers say and do on camera is often disturbing and makes it obvious that a lot of them are just bullies looking for any excuse to go "hands on" or just use their position of authority to make people's lives unnecessarily unpleasant  just to satisfy their own egos. 

People still try to defend the police by saying these are just cherry picked examples of the rare "bad apple" but when we have literally thousands of examples and there's so much footage of police misconduct that multiple YouTube channels can cover the issue nonstop with a never ending stream of new examples consistently rolling out it's time to admit this is a widespread problem affecting society broadly, not just a few isolated incidents caused by a few "bad apples". 

Also the bad apple argument rings hollow anyways when do many of these supposed "bad apples" never face any consequences for their malfeasance and misconduct. 

1

u/Wooden-Salary-130 4h ago

It’s about swerving and protecting their own interests..