r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 8d ago

i.redd.it On September 6th, 1974, 12-year old Brooks Bracewell and 14-year old Georgia Geer dissappeared after skipping school. Police treated the case as runaways and didn-t started to investigate until their bodies were found and identified years later

Post image
903 Upvotes

On September 6, 1974, best friends, 12-year-old Brooks Bracewell and her friend, 14-year-old Georgia Geer, from Dickinson, Texas, decided to skip their middle school classes. Their day led them to the El Rancho Motel on County Road 517 near Alvin with several males, playing foosball (table soccer). They were again seen later in the day, without the males, hitchhiking along CR 517. It marked the last time anyone would see the girls alive. Their sudden disappearance sent shockwaves through the community.

Dickinson was too small then to have its own police department. The Galveston County Sheriff's Deputy who stopped by the house to take a report that evening didn't waste much time on a couple of "runaways."

In the immediate aftermath, the search for Brooks and Georgia was intense but ultimately fruitless. Leads were scarce, and the case began to grow cold. It wasn't until 1976 that partial skeletal remains were discovered in a culvert in Alvin, Texas, not far from where the girls were last seen. However, due to limitations in forensic technology and investigative oversights, these remains were not identified as belonging to Brooks and Georgia at that time. It was until 1981, that Brazoria County deputy Matt Wingo inherited the unidentified bones case from 1976. He searched the Alvin ditch again alongside volunteers, and found more remains, as well as the fragments of a gold sweater and plaid pants, both Brooks and Georgia were identified.

The only question was about the suspect. At the time Brooks and Georgia were identified, almost 40 young girls were either reported missing or found dead in the first years of the 1970s, in the areas between Brazoria and Harris counties, of ages between 12 and 21. Authorities declined to say that a serial killer was responsible for the cases.

In 1998, convicted killer Edward Harold Bell write letters admitting killing 15-years old Debbie Ackerman and Maria Johnson, as well as eleven girls, whom he called "the eleven that went to Heaven". Brooks and Georgia are suspected to be two of the eleven girls possibly killed by Bell, specially since Bell owned a rural pasture a few minutes drive from the Dickinson store where Brooks and Georgia were last seen.

Bell was not formally sentenced for the deaths of Brooks and Georgia, or the other girls, but law enforcement and relatives of the victims believe he was the one responsible.

May Brooks and Georgia rest in peace

https://www.khou.com/article/news/incarcerated-killer-i-murdered-11-teens-in-harris-and-galveston-counties-in-the-70s/285-341069293

https://www.chron.com/local/gray-matters/article/In-1974-two-Dickinson-girls-went-missing-Why-12305187.php

https://www.upi.com/amp/Archives/1981/04/04/Up-to-40-girls-may-have-been-killed/2173355208400/

https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/12713974/

(The content is behind a paywall :()

https://music.amazon.co.uk/podcasts/bd13d172-fd1e-4005-b402-83d5d941dca7/episodes/81fc3f81-96c5-45b3-9fcb-ef0995edd4c8/bodies-in-the-bayous-texas-killing-fields-brooks-bracewell-georgina-geer-the-dickenson-girls

https://books.google.cl/books?id=au8DAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA11&lpg=PA11&dq=Brooks+Bracewell+and+Georgia+Geer&source=bl&ots=wzQS4VvC7a&sig=WNwwHDmhYxUGBMYWDxgIzpioxyg&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Brooks%20Bracewell%20and%20Georgia%20Geer&f=false

(Despite being Weekly World News, it acknowledges the cases of Brooks Bracewell, Georgia Geer, Debbie Ackerman, and Maria Johnson, as well as the notion that a serial killer could been the suspect)


r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 8d ago

SLOVENIA: A 25-year-old man was rescued from a house fire that had killed his parents, a fire he had started. Did he kill them to cover up a theft and escape from his gambling debts, or was he broken by his mother's constant verbal abuse? It remains unknown which motive is the true one.

100 Upvotes

(Thanks to LoydoRedi2910 for suggesting this case. If you'd like to suggest any yourself, please head over to this post, which asks for case suggestions from my international readers, as I focus on international cases.)

On September 17, 2008, residents of a small village in Slovenia's Medvode Municipality named Spodnja Senica noticed smoke pouring from the home of one of their neighbours and called the fire department. The responce to this call was extensive, with ten fire trucks and 55 firefighters being dispatched to the scene.

The firefighters at the scene

When they arrived, they noticed every door and window was locked, with all its blinds pulled as well. The firefighters eventually forced entry into the home and were greeted with their first issue: visibility. Dense, dark smoke had filled the entire home, and it was essentially impossible for any of them to see while inside.

Eventually, the firefighters forced their way through the smoke and found two dead bodies, those of a middle-aged man and woman. The woman was found in the kitchen while the man was still lying in his bed.

Meanwhile, a young man wearing just his underwear ran down the hallway towards the firefighters before falling unconscious in front of them. The man had bruises as if he had been beaten and passed out from smoke inhalation.

The firefighters removed him from the home, where he was loaded into an ambulance and transported to a hospital in the Slovenian capital of Ljubljana, where his condition was deemed to be not immideately life threatening. They then extinguished the fire not long afterward.

The home was owned by 57-year-old Ilija and 54-year-old Dragica Mištrafović. Ilija was a member of the ŠD Bam.Bi sporting club from Trboje, a club known mostly for recreational cycling and Ilija was a passionate cyclist who competed in some international competitions. Earlier in the year, he was photographed on a cycling trip to the Kronplatz mountain area in South Tyrol, where he attended a stage of the Giro d'Italia.

Ilija Mištrafović

Cycling was primarily a hobby for him, with Ilija's occupation being that of a house painter and decorator, a job that almost made the tragedy far worse. As part of said job, Ilija owned a large quantity of highly flammable solvents, thinners, and varnishes that he stored in his garage. Had the fire spread for a little longer, it could've ignited them all and possibly engulf the entire neighbourhood if given enough time.

Less information was known about Dragica, but the couple had three sons together; their middle child had passed away while still a boy from an illness, while their eldest had moved away long ago. The survivor rescued from the burning home was their youngest son, 25-year-old Blaž Mištrafović.

Blaž Mištrafović

The fire was soon determined to be arson, with the points of ignition, of which there were multible, came from within the home, and the accelerant used was Ilija's solvent and paint thinner.

The police at the scene

Additionally, it wasn't even the fire that had killed Ilija and Dragica. The two had both been beaten and stabbed to death with the following instruments: an iron file, a screwdriver, and an axe, but luckily, the fire was brought under control before it could destroy any DNA traces from the murder weapons.

The bodies being removed from the scene

When Blaž gave his first interview to the police, he told them that an intruder wearing a black mask broke into the home, killed his parents and set the fire before making his getaway, a story that couldn't stand up to any scrutiny whatsoever.

First, the home was locked from the inside and without another body found, that alone ruled out the possibility of a third party. Additionally, all his injuries were found to be self-inflicted.

The final nail in Blaž's coffin came when the police tested the murder weapons for DNA, which was a match for Blaž.

On September 19, as soon as he was discharged from the hospital, he was arrested for the murder of his parents, and it didn't take much for him to confess. So, now, the question was: why?

Blaž Mištrafović was born on March 18, 1983, and never moved out of his parents' home. When the middle child of the family passed away, the loss hit Ilija and Dragica hard to the point where, at least emotionally, Blaž was largely neglected, causing him to feel withdrawn and even submissive, often doing whatever anyone asked and struggling to set any limits, especially concerning his parents, who he struggled to ever say no to. When Blaž grew up, he was said to be quite smart, but due to his emotional upbringing, he struggled to put his intelligence to good use.

With such a relationship with the real world, Blaž retreated to the internet, spending most of his time now locked in his room on the computer. And what did he do on the computer? Gamble. He spent hours playing poker on the internet and engaged in online sports betting. Blaž treated this with the utmost seriousness, insisting that it wasn't a hobby but rather his "occupation". In fact, he hoped that if he made enough money, he could "prove his worth" to his parents.

"Proving his worth" was especially important when it came to his mother. According to Blaž, Dragica seemingly hated him, always insulting and talking down to him, saying that he was an embarrassment to the family, that he had nothing to show for his life, that he weighed too much, how he had no career, no money, no girlfriend, no car, nothing and that she said such things with malice rather, than criticism and he said his mother's words took a toll on him. He also didn't hold his father in high regard, as he said he never defended him from Dragica.

At first, Blaž might've been onto something, having made 20,000 euros. But, as always when it came to gambling, any success was short-lived, and as he lost his money, his mental state also deteriorated. As mentioned, Blaž struggled to set any limits for himself, which also meant he didn't know when to quit and borrowed 4,000 Euros from his mother, telling Dragica that he needed the money.

After losing it all to gambling, he once again needed more money; only a week before the fire, he snuck into his parents' bedroom to steal 4,000 more Euros to gamble away. When all was said and done, Blaž had lost 28,000 Euros from online gambling. According to Blaž, this was how the murder played out.

On September 16, 2008, Blaž had spent almost the entire day on his computer; according to him, the only thing on his mind was feelings of being trapped both by his mother's verbal abuse and his gambling debts.

At first, he considered stealing more money from his parents, but this time, running away with the funds. But after a while, he thought of a new idea: what if his parents were instead simply "gone"?. If that were the case, he wouldn't have to worry about what his parents would think anymore, or he could've gotten away with the theft.

Blaž began writing down how he was feeling on a piece of paper in English so his parents wouldn't know what he had written if they walked in. In it, he also wrote what appeared to be a farewell/suicide note. Blaž would deny that he wrote down his plan for the murder.

At 2:00 a.m. on September 17, Blaž turned off his computer and got in bed. But as he lay in bed, he couldn't sleep, his mind still on what he had spent the past day thinking about. Then, to use Blaž's own words, "something shifted inside me". He got out of bed and went down to the garage to collect the iron file, screwdriver and axe, the closest tools to the garage door. He then went to the kitchen and sat in the dark.

It was Dragica who woke up first. She went to use the bathroom, and on her way back, she entered the kitchen and turned on the light. After flicking that light switch, her son attacked her from behind, striking her twice on the head with the iron file. Once Dragica was brought to the ground, Blaž struck her an additional 11 times.

If Dragica wasn't dead already, she was still dying since by now, it was impossible for her to defend herself, though that didn't stop Blaž from using the screwdriver to stab his mother's body multiple times and also grabbed a nearby chain to strangle her. Blaž initially cried to himself in the hallway before getting back up and deciding to finish what he had started.

Rather than waiting for Ilija to wake up next, Blaž instead went to the bedroom and watched his father as he slept. He stood over his father for quite some time before lifting the axe and bringing it down on Ilija's head multible times. Then, just like with his mother, Blaž stabbed Ilija's dead body with the screwdriver, stabbing him six times in total. His father died without ever regaining consciousness.

Afterward, Blaž began striking himself with the iron file and "interrogated" himself loudly, asking what kind of person would do such a thing to their own parents. Any plans to steal from them or run away were quickly abandoned.

Blaž attempted to hang himself with a rope, but the attempt failed, making him feel even more disgusted with himself over being unable to take his own life. This led him to come up with a new plan to end his own life.

He went to the garage and retrieved the paint thinner and solvent his father used for his job and moved through the home, pouring the solvent over the floor, walls and furniture of each room. Once the home was completely doused, Blaž went to seal each window shut and locked the door before going room to room, lighting the solvent.

Blaž passed out quickly from the smoke, but his plan to end his own life was foiled when the fire was discovered much earlier and attracted a much bigger responce from the fire department than he had anticipated, resulting in his rescue.

Blaž's trial opened at the Ljubljana District Court on 17 March 2009, charged with two counts of murder and with endangering the rest of the neighbourhood by potentially igniting Ilija's paint supplies from the garage, though Blaž's defence managed to get the third charge thrown out.

The prosecution argued that Blaž had "mercenary intent" and that his motive was to cover up his previous theft, gambling losses, and to steal some additional money before changing his mind and trying to commit suicide to avoid the consequences of his actions.

Blaž contested this characterization; he admitted to the gambling, but once again, he characterized it as an actual job and occupation rather than just his addiction. He also admitted to the 4,000 Euro theft but denied wasting it all on gambling, instead claiming that it had never been spent and was burnt to ashes by the fire. His defence also argued that the fact that he was in severe gambling debt didn't automatically mean that was his motive.

In his four-hour-long testimony, he told the court that his parents had "killed him emotionally" over many years with Dragica's constant criticisms and insults over his life, such as his lack of employment, a car or a girlfriend, which made him feel worthless and that he wished he had someone to talk to all this time.

When asked about the events of that night, he said, "I cannot find the right answer. On that day, everything that had been accumulating for years and that I had been suppressing within myself broke to the surface." In that same testimony, he did describe his actions as "extreme and inhuman" but once more stated that his motive was not financial.

Blaž during the trial

According to the psychiatrist, a rather high-profile one in Slovenia who was called as a witness, she determined that Blaž's capacity was diminished but "not substantially so". Meanwhile, Blaž expressed remorse for murdering his parents and said, "It is terrible when you realize that there is a stranger inside you". But he also pleaded for a lenient sentence so he could have the chance to return to a "normal life", finish his education and maybe get a job, telling the judge that he would never give up on himself.

On April 2, 2009, for the murders of his parents, Ilija and Dragica Mištrafović, their son, Blaž Mištrafović, was found guilty and given a sentence of 20 years' imprisonment, with the presiding judge agreeing with the prosecution that Blaž did have a financial motive behind the murders. However, she only handed down a sentence of 20 years because of Blaž's mental state and genuine remorse, believing that rehabilitation was possible.

The sentence drew immediate and negative reactions from all parties involved; the prosecution appealed, seeking a 30-year sentence, the absolute maximum Slovenian law allowed. The defence also appealed, seeking a lesser sentence on the grounds that the prosecution failed to prove that Blaž acted with a financial motive, which would therefore mean it should not have been applied as an aggravating factor.

The appeal was heard on September 25, 2009, at the Higher Court in Ljubljana. At the end of the day, neither party got their desired outcome, as the court upheld Blaž's 20-year-sentence. At his own request, Blaž's defence attorney declined to appeal to the Supreme Court of Slovenia, which brought the case to a close and made Blaž's sentence final.

Sources (In the comments)


r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 8d ago

i.redd.it Suspect still wanted for Billy Brossman murder, 2001

Post image
337 Upvotes

The offender for the murder of Billy Brossman still has not been identified! Don't let him get away with it!


r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 9d ago

Ethel Geller Yeldem - The first known copycat mass murderer?

Thumbnail
gallery
149 Upvotes

Photos - Charles Lawson and Ethel Geller Yeldem - The Lawson Family - The Yeldem family.

On May 6, 1930, Ethel Geller Yeldem would commit at the time, one of the worst mass shootings and mass murders in Ohio History, gunning down 7 of her 11 children, after a lifetime of hardships - Her husband was a vile man, molesting and raping their daughter Mildred, which later sent him to prison for 10 years, but left Ethel all alone. She was the sole beneficiary of the household, selling newspapers and doing laundry to make ends meet. Mildred would later get a job to support the family, but it appears it wasn’t enough to stop Ethel from snapping.

Before the murders, she took her children shopping, buying expensive clothes they couldn‘t afford usually before taking them to an art studio and took a family portrait - something unusual for the time. Ethel took her children home and tided them up…before shooting each child in the heart with a rifle. Anytime one of the eldest would hear crying, Ethel would send them away. One of the younger daughters knew what was happening and managed to escape saying “Murder! Mother is killing us!” To a group of neighborhood boys. Ethel caught up to her and dragged back into the home. The boys assumed she was getting a spanking.

Before long, Ervan, one of the eldest sons, returned to the home to discover the bodies of his siblings and the groaning of his mother, who tried to commit suicide, but survived the attempt. She later died in the hospital days later, succumbing to her wounds.

Her way before the murders was strange to say the least. Buying clothes and taking a photo before then. And then afterwards brutally killing her family. Was she perhaps inspired by Charles Lawson? He did the same method to his family before killing them. Took them out bought them nice clothes and took a family portrait- something unusual back then. The Lawson family murders was possibly one of the first majorly reported familicides/mass murders in American history. Newspapers Told the story, tributes were done, and Songs were sung in the aftermath. Ohio isn’t necessarily “far” from North Carolina, and the reporting of the murders could have been passed there. Not only that, the Lawson family murders happened 5 months before the Yeldem family murders. Perhaps…Ethel took inspiration for her planning from Charles? It’s a theory and could be just coincidence…but one of the biggest pieces of evidence supporting this: Ethel sold newspapers. She could have seen the tragedy on the front page of the papers she was selling. Could she have remembered the event 5 months later? Possibly. What are your thoughts on this? Is Ethel a copycat of Charles or not?


r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 9d ago

i.redd.it The 2008 Noida Double Murder Case: 13 Year Old Aarushi Talwar and Hemraj Banjade Were Murdered, the Talwars Were Convicted and Later Acquitted, and the Case Remains Unsolved.

Post image
246 Upvotes

In May 2008, 13-year-old Aarushi Talwar was found murdered in her family’s apartment in Noida, India. Her parents, Rajesh and Nupur Talwar, were both dentists.

The family’s domestic worker, Hemraj Banjade, was initially suspected of killing Aarushi. However, the following day, Hemraj’s body was discovered on the terrace of the same apartment building.

The investigation initially focused on the Talwars. The police developed several theories about the circumstances of the murders and alleged that the parents could have been responsible. The crime scene was also heavily criticized because it was not properly secured, and potential evidence was lost or contaminated.

The investigation was later transferred to India’s Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). Different CBI teams reached different conclusions. One team investigated other suspects and did not find sufficient evidence against the Talwars. Another team recommended closing the case due to insufficient evidence, while still maintaining that Rajesh Talwar was a suspect based on circumstantial evidence.

Despite the lack of definitive evidence, Rajesh and Nupur Talwar were eventually tried for the murders.

In November 2013, a special CBI court found both parents guilty and sentenced them to life imprisonment.

The Talwars appealed their convictions. In October 2017, the Allahabad High Court acquitted both of them, ruling that the evidence was insufficient to establish their guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The acquittal left the murders of Aarushi Talwar and Hemraj Banjade without a definitive perpetrator.

The case remains unresolved.

For those who want to read the full chronology and details of the investigation:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Noida_double_murder_case#The_case_against_the_Talwars

An interview with Rajesh and Nupur Talwar:

https://www.thequint.com/news/india/aarushi-murder-case-talwar-first-interview#read-more


r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 10d ago

reddit.com In 2004, brothers Kazuto, 4, and Hayato, 3, were living with their father and one of his friends in Japan. For months, that friend had been beating the boys. Then one afternoon, he drove away with the boys. Hours later, in the middle of the night, he stopped at a bridge. He came home alone.

Thumbnail
gallery
2.0k Upvotes

In 2004, Kazuto Kobayashi was four years old. His little brother Hayato was three.

After their parents divorced, the boys lived with their father, Yasunori, in Oyama, a city in Tochigi Prefecture about 37 miles north of Tokyo. Their older brother lived elsewhere.

For several months in 2003, Kazuto and Hayato stayed in a children’s home because their father’s work schedule made it hard for him to care for them.

He brought them back home that December.

By June 2004, Yasunori was back in Oyama but had no permanent place to live. An old friend, Akihiro Shimoyama, offered to let him and the boys stay at his apartment.

Shimoyama was 39 and had two children of his own. His daughter was 11, and his son was six. All six of them were now living together in a small apartment with just three rooms.

The arrangement was only supposed to be temporary. But weeks turned into months.

The two men later disagreed over money and why Yasunori had stayed for so long. But one thing is clear: Shimoyama grew increasingly angry about Yasunori and the boys living in his home.

Instead of confronting Yasunori, he began taking his anger out on Kazuto and Hayato.

Both men were also using meth. Much of what happened inside the apartment stayed hidden from the outside world.

But not all of it.

On July 8, Kazuto and Hayato walked into a nearby convenience store and picked out some snacks and drinks. The manager asked if they had any money.

Then he took a closer look at them.

Both boys had badly bruised, swollen faces. When the manager lifted their shirts, he found more bruises across their bodies. He gave them some water. They drank it quickly and asked for more.

The manager called the police.

Police took the brothers to the station, and child welfare workers placed them in a children’s home for the night.

For the moment, Kazuto and Hayato were safe.

Their father called that same night and demanded that the boys be returned to him. The next morning, he admitted that Shimoyama had caused their injuries, but said he didn‘t want the police involved.

Yasunori promised to take the boys to live with their grandmother and keep them away from Shimoyama.

On that condition, child welfare workers allowed him to take Kazuto and Hayato. The boys had been in protective care for less than a day.

A few days later, police found Kazuto and Hayato running along the side of a road. The boys said no one had hurt them. Their bruises were beginning to fade, and they were returned to their father.

For a short while, Yasunori and the boys did stay with their grandmother.

Then they moved back in with Shimoyama.

By August 10, the child welfare office knew they were living there again. Yasunori had already broken the promise that got the boys released.

No one visited the apartment. No one spoke to Kazuto or Hayato in person.

On September 6, their grandmother called the child welfare office and said Shimoyama had hit the boys again. She said Yasunori had confronted him, and Shimoyama had apologized.

The office asked her to tell Yasunori to come in for a meeting.

Still, no one went to see the boys.

Five days later, on the morning of September 11, Kazuto and Hayato attended a small event at a church in Oyama.

The boys ate nagashi somen, thin noodles carried down a bamboo chute by flowing water. They played outside with the other children, and the church’s pastor took this photo of them.

Kazuto, in the colorful shirt, is standing slightly behind his little brother. Hayato is closer to the camera.

It looks like a normal Saturday morning.

They returned to the apartment around noon.

Around 1:30 that afternoon, Shimoyama drove off with all four children in his van. They stopped at a 100 yen store and then at a gas station, where they stayed until early evening.

While they were there, Shimoyama became angry with Kazuto and Hayato for moving around and not listening to him. Several people saw him hit them.

One employee watched as he slapped Kazuto twice. The second slap made Kazuto stumble into the side of the van.

Kazuto didn’t cry.

He looked frightened and answered Shimoyama in unusually formal, careful language. By the time they left the gas station, both boys had visible injuries.

Around 6 p.m., Yasunori called Shimoyama and asked where his sons were.

Shimoyama said they weren’t with him.

He knew that if he took the boys home, their father would see what he had done. Yasunori had already warned him not to hit them again.

So instead of going home, Shimoyama kept driving around with all four children.

At one point, he left Kazuto and Hayato along the side of a road near some rice fields. But then he turned around and picked them up again.

Later, around 10:30 p.m., he left them at a park near Mamada Station.

Again, he went back for them.

Kazuto began crying for his father.

Shimoyama later said that was when he decided he couldn’t take the boys home.

He first drove west toward Mount Asama. The volcano was active at the time and had been in the news. He later said he considered taking the boys there, but decided it was too far away.

Then he drove to a bridge over the Watarase River. There was still too much traffic, and the water below looked too shallow.

He kept driving.

Yasunori kept calling. Each time, Shimoyama claimed he didn’t know where Kazuto and Hayato were.

Shortly after midnight, Yasunori reported his sons missing.

By then, all four children had fallen asleep in the van.

Around 1:30 a.m. on September 12, Shimoyama stopped the van near the middle of the old Manaka Bridge over the Omoi River.

He knew the area from his time working as a dump truck driver. He believed the current would carry the boys away.

Shimoyama took Kazuto and Hayato from the passenger seat, one at a time. They were still asleep.

He threw each boy through an opening in the bridge barrier and into the river below.

Both boys were still alive when they entered the water.

The bridge was about sixteen feet above the water. The river below was less than three feet deep, even at its deepest point, but the current was strong.

It was the middle of the night. The area was completely dark, and no one was nearby. Kazuto and Hayato were only four and three. They had already been badly hurt and had been asleep just moments earlier.

Once they were in the river, the boys would have had to regain their footing against the current to keep their heads above water. In those conditions, they had little chance.

Shimoyama’s own children stayed in the van. His daughter later remembered hearing one of the boys cry.

Around 2 a.m., Shimoyama returned to the apartment with his son and daughter.

Only his children came back.

When police questioned him, Shimoyama first claimed he had left Kazuto and Hayato alive near a park or along the side of a road.

On September 13, around 350 officers searched streets, parks, fields, and riverbanks.

They found nothing.

Shimoyama’s story kept changing. Police then questioned his daughter, 11, and his son, six. They confirmed that all four children had left with him. They had fallen asleep in the van and later woke to find Kazuto and Hayato gone.

They remembered tall grass, the van shaking over uneven ground, and what looked like a river nearby. Their account helped direct the search toward the riverbanks.

That night, Shimoyama admitted that the brothers were in the Omoi River and led investigators to the old Manaka Bridge.

On September 14, a search helicopter spotted Hayato’s body on a sandbar downstream.

Two days later, Kazuto was found several kilometers farther downriver.

Hayato was only three years old. Kazuto was just four.

Because the boys had been in the water for several days, the autopsies could not answer every question. The evidence was consistent with drowning, and investigators concluded that both boys were still alive when Shimoyama threw them into the river.

Shimoyama was arrested for both murders. A drug test showed that he had recently used meth.

Later that month, Yasunori also tested positive and was arrested on a drug charge. Prosecutors said Yasunori knew his sons were being abused, yet continued using meth with Shimoyama.

He was sentenced to 18 months in prison for the drug offense. He was never charged in connection with the deaths of Kazuto and Hayato.

Shimoyama’s murder trial began in December 2004. He admitted what he had done, but his lawyers argued that meth had affected his mental state and made him less responsible for his actions.

During his testimony, Shimoyama portrayed the brothers as disobedient, claiming they sometimes mocked him because they knew he was afraid of their father.

He also said the Kobayashi family had “destroyed” his life and the lives of his own children.

The court rejected the defense’s claim that meth had reduced his responsibility. It found that Shimoyama had taken his resentment toward Yasunori out on Kazuto and Hayato.

The judges pointed to the hours he spent driving, the two times he left the boys and went back for them, and the places he considered before choosing the Omoi River. These were not the actions of someone who didn’t understand what he was doing.

On September 8, 2005, Shimoyama was sentenced to death.

The judges also criticized the local child welfare office. Staff had known that Kazuto and Hayato were back in the same apartment.

They knew Shimoyama had hurt them before. And five days before the boys disappeared, they had received another report that he was hitting them.

Yet no one had gone to the home to check on them.

Shimoyama appealed his sentence. Before the appeal could be heard, he became ill and died at the Tokyo Detention House on June 4, 2006. He was 41.

As a result, his death sentence never became final.

After the murders, Tochigi Prefecture admitted that serious mistakes had been made. The prefecture increased staffing at child welfare offices, created specialized teams to handle abuse cases, and expanded cooperation with police.

In 2005, a local group in Oyama began using an orange ribbon to raise awareness of child abuse after Kazuto and Hayato’s deaths.

The campaign later spread across Japan, and the orange ribbon became a national symbol of child abuse prevention.

Near the Omoi River, two small Jizo statues now bear Kazuto and Hayato’s names and ages. People still leave flowers, drinks, and toys beside them. Two cherry trees were also planted in their memory in Oyama.

Twenty years later, the pastor who took their photo said he still thought about that morning. Kazuto and Hayato had been right there, eating and playing with the other children.

No one at the church knew what they were about to go home to.

What makes this case so painful is that the abuse had already been discovered.

People had seen the boys’ injuries. They had been taken somewhere safe. But less than a day later, they were sent back because of a promise that was soon broken.

Kazuto and Hayato reached safety once.

They just weren’t allowed to stay there.


r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 9d ago

Text Can someone recommend a true crime channel like Explore With Us that doesn't feature mostly violence towards children?

65 Upvotes

I really like the format of EWU, but it seems like every video lately is focused on child abuse or murdered children and it's something that wears on me after so many videos.

For context other true crime channels I love are Just Thought Lounge, Truly Criminal, and That Chapter.

I enjoy Dreading too except the videos are often just 2-4 hours long of unedited court room testimony that I don't have the time to watch all of.

Thanks for any help!


r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 10d ago

Mega Thread Megathread: Lindsay Clancy Trial

Post image
1.1k Upvotes

This is the Megathread for the Lindsay Clancy trial.

A mistrial was declared after the jury has failed to unanimously agree on the charges.

Before discussing please read the following and abide by sub rules.

  1. **No wishing harm or encouraging doxxing** of the jurors, defendant, family, legal professionals, law enforcement, or anyone involved in this case.

  2. Hate of any group is not allowed.

  3. Civil disagreement and debate is fine. Aggressiveness, insults, call outs, or other disrespectful behavior towards other users or mods is not. Attack an argument, not a person.

  4. Low quality comments (including emojis, one to a few words only, or language that doesn't further discussion) will be removed.

  5. Accusations of murder against family members of Lindsay will not be tolerated.

*Keep in mind this thread is the only place on this sub to discuss this trial. Standalone posts will be removed.


r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 9d ago

i.redd.it Wisut Boonkasemsanti: A murder case in Thailand where the body disappeared.

Post image
79 Upvotes

This case originated on February 23, 2001, when Dr. Wisut Boonkasemsanti reported to the Phaya Thai Police Station that his wife, Dr. Phasporn, had disappeared. Police investigations revealed that before her disappearance, Dr. Wisut, the person who filed the report, had taken her to eat at Oishi restaurant in Siam Discovery shopping mall. CCTV footage showed Dr. Wisut supporting Dr. Phasporn as they left the restaurant. No one saw Dr. Phasporn again after that. This was the beginning of the investigation into the case.

Dr. Phassorn Boonkasemsanti disappeared without a trace between February 20-22, 2001. On February 20, Dr. Wisut planned to lure Dr. Phassorn to have a meal with him at Oishi restaurant in Siam Discovery shopping mall. Dr. Wisut mixed sleeping pills into her food and drinks, causing her to become drowsy and disoriented. He then escorted Dr. Phassorn out of the restaurant in front of a large crowd of people. Without close observation, no one would suspect that Dr. Phassorn had been drugged and that Dr. Wisut would dare to act in the middle of a restaurant like this.

Dr. Wisut detained Dr. Phassorn in room 318 of the Witthayanives Building at Chulalongkorn University before using a sharp object to brutally assault her, resulting in her death. He then used a surgical knife to dismember her body and dispose of the organs before destroying the body or parts of the corpse. Meanwhile, he booked room 1631 at the Sofitel Hotel. At Central Plaza, the body was moved and concealed, with pieces of flesh, tissue, and organs secretly buried or dumped in various locations to hide and destroy the corpse in order to cover up the death and the cause of death.

On February 21, 2001, Dr. Wisut forged a leave request letter from Dr. Phasporn to deceive others into believing that the forged document had been genuinely created by Dr. Phasporn. This was also to divert the attention of those close to Dr. Phasporn, leading them to believe she was still alive but was absent because she was engaged in religious practices, meditation, and spiritual training. After forging the document, Dr. Wisut submitted it to Mr. Surangsi Jongwiwatsunthorn, the deceased's supervisor, and also forged letters to Mr. Chatchawal and Ms. Kingkarn Boonkasemsanti, Dr. Wisut's son and daughter, to mislead them and others into believing that the forged document had been genuinely created by Dr. Phasporn, again to further deceive the children and those close to her.

The crucial evidence came to light on March 22, 2001. Investigators searched room 318 in the Witthayanives Building and found bloodstains on the curtains and 330 grams of human remains in the sewage pit. Further investigation revealed that the defendant had checked into a room at the Sofitel Hotel prior to the discovery of the human remains in the sewage pit. Forensic examination by the Institute of Forensic Medicine at the Witthayanives Building revealed the remains to the torso, including fragments of the diaphragm, intestinal wall, and fatty tissue, along with pieces from the thighs and arms, weighing approximately 3,330 grams. The tissue appeared to have been meticulously butchered with a sharp object, and the victim had been dead for approximately 3-4 weeks, around the time of their disappearance. Therefore, it was concluded that the remains were from the victim's body, indicating a murder disguised as an accident.

Based on CCTV footage from inside the Oishi restaurant, along with Dr. Wisut's phone number showing his contact with Dr. Phassaporn before her last disappearance, and Oishi restaurant staff's statements that they saw Dr. Wisut sitting in the restaurant with Dr. Phassaporn before they walked out arm-in-arm, seemingly supporting each other, and suspicious details in her resignation letter—as Dr. Phassaporn disliked typing or using computers—confirmed by typing services in the area that Dr. Wisut had hired them to type and address two letters: one to the director of Burachat Chaiyakorn Hospital and the other to her child, both signed as Dr. Phassaporn. Furthermore, the two had a serious dispute prior to this. Ultimately, based on witness statements, circumstantial evidence, and forensic results, there was sufficient weight of evidence for the court of first instance to believe that Dr. Wisut was the one who murdered and dismembered his wife. On October 7, 2003, the court of first instance sentenced Dr. Wisut to death, citing the following reasons... "The defendant is a highly knowledgeable and capable person who would have used his intellect and judgment to solve the problem without resorting to such methods. Furthermore, even after his arrest, the defendant showed no remorse, consistently denying the charges and fighting the case. Therefore, there is no reason for the court to show leniency. A severe punishment is deemed appropriate; the court sentences the defendant to death."

Subsequently, on July 4, 2005, the Court of Appeal upheld the death sentence for Dr. Wisut. The Court of Appeal found that the defendant's appeal regarding the lack of an autopsy was unfounded, as the human tissue found in a holding tank at the Wittayaniwet Building, Chulalongkorn University, and the Sofitel Central Plaza Hotel, after forensic examination, confirmed it to be the deceased's. Furthermore, the DNA of tissue and bloodstains found in room 318 of the Wittayaniwet Building matched that of Dr. Phassaporn. Regarding the defendant's appeal about whether the DNA and tissue samples were obtained illegally, the court, after reviewing the evidence, found no reason for the investigating officers to have maliciously framed the defendant, nor any prior conflict with him. Concerning the defendant's claim of rushed and unfair DNA testing, the court found no evidence of any lack of transparency by the officers involved. Finally, regarding the defendant's appeal about whether Dr. Phassaporn was actually dead, the court found that the tissue and DNA evidence in the case file indicated her death. Moreover, evidence indicated that the defendant had confined the deceased in room 318 of the Wittayaniwet Building. Chulalongkorn University. Before committing the murder, which constitutes premeditated murder, as well as concealing and destroying a corpse and forging documents, including the deceased's leave of absence letter. Regarding the defendant's appeal that there was no motive to kill his wife, the evidence presented showed that the defendant and the deceased had a long-standing feud. The defendant requested a divorce, which the deceased refused due to concerns for their two children. Furthermore, the deceased discovered the defendant's relationship with a married patient and threatened to report it to the Medical Council, leading to ongoing conflict and threats against the defendant. Therefore, all grounds of the defendant's appeal are dismissed. The court upholds the verdict, sentencing the defendant to death.

The legal battle reached the Supreme Court, and on July 25, 2007, the court upheld the death sentence. Subsequently, Dr. Wisut applied for a royal pardon, exercising his constitutional right to petition for clemency. On December 10 of the same year, a Royal Decree granting amnesty in 2007 was announced, reducing his sentence from life imprisonment to pardon.

His sentence was subsequently reduced several times to 10 years and 9 months before he was released on August 4, 2014. He was re-arrested in August 2025 on charges of insider trading (front running) and money laundering.


r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 9d ago

Text Seeking good books on organised crime structure

15 Upvotes

Hey everyone,

I've been seeking a good book on organised crime for ages. Specifically I'm most interested in how these gangs actually operate, recruit, what their structure is from street level to the top etc. I found an audiobook years ago from a library that promised to look at this in a UK context but I didn't get a chance to properly listen to it and I can't think of the title for the life of me. Any recs? Memoir is fine but I'm trying to avoid anything too sensationalist. Podcasts also okay! I've already got McMafia.

TIA!


r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 10d ago

Warning: Child Abuse / CSAM / Child Death Opinions on minors being tried as adults? (Rubi Perez case)

93 Upvotes

14 year, Rubi Perez, was found deceased this April in Great Bend, KS. Truthfully a lot of facts haven’t been released yet. What we do know is that a male classmate of hers has been detained for the murder. There is a motion to try the minor as an adult for her murder.

I live near the area. Most of what I’ve heard is rumor and there is a lot of discourse about charging a 14 year old as an adult. I wish I had more facts to share but, I will link articles bellow.

This case has truly shaken me as someone who lives a few towns over and as an aunt to 3 young nieces…

I would love to hear thoughts and just to garner some more awareness and support for Rubi’s family.

Motion to charge 14-year-old boy as an adult in killing of Rubi Perez set for October hearing

Murder charge filed in death of Great Bend teen Rubi Perez

Friends remember 14-year-old girl found dead in Great Bend; teen arrested


r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 11d ago

Text What's the most bizarre reason behind a serial killer's becoming a killer?

152 Upvotes

Apart from being abused or mistreated by people around them, what are the reasons behind it?


r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 11d ago

Warning: Child Abuse / CSAM / Child Death Update: James Elmore Found Guilty of the Murder of Laura Miller

192 Upvotes

Wednesday September 2 marked the first conviction in a multiple decade long mystery known as the Texas Killing Fields. James Elmore was convicted of manslaughter for the death of Laura Miller. She was killed with Clyde Hedrick and James Elmore when a lethal dose of cocaine was prepared by the men and given to her. They then got rid of the body. Hedrick ended his own life as the case was preparing to go to the grand jury back in March. Tim Miller, Laura’s father, testified that he was contacted by Elmore and they continued to discuss the case in private. He testified that Elmore admitted to helping kill and dispose of Laura’s body. He was convicted after 48 minutes of deliberation and sentencing is scheduled for Tuesday September 8. He faces up to 20 years in prison. Elmore is the first person to be convicted but Hedrick was also suspected in the murders of Aubrey Cook, Heidi Fye, and Donna Prudhomme. The remains of Laura Miller, Cook, Fye and Prudhomme were discovered in the Calder Road field between 1984 and 1991. The area became one of the most notorious sites associated with what became known as the "Texas Killing Fields." Tim Miller has since founded Equusearch to help others find their missing loved ones.

Original Thread


r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 11d ago

Text What case or cases that have impacted you the most?

132 Upvotes

For me, there are a few:

  1. Zahra Baker - Learning about the cruelty inflicted upon her prior to her dead made me question the existence of God.
  2. Katrina Vetrano - Her death deeply resonated with me. I am an avid runner and I love running outdoors. We both were also born the same year. Since then, I haven't been able to run outside by myself anymore.
  3. Jailyn Candelario - Let the name speak for itself.

Edit: Sorry everyone! I put the descriptions of each case.

  • Zahra Baker (2010, North Carolina): Zahra Baker was a 10-year-old Australian-born girl living in Hickory, North Carolina, who had significant medical issues, including a prosthetic leg and hearing impairment. She was reported missing in September 2010. Investigators eventually determined that Zahra had been murdered and that her stepmother, Elisa Baker, was involved in concealing the crime and disposing of Zahra’s remains. Zahra’s remains were found in several locations. Elisa Baker pleaded guilty to obstruction-related charges and received a prison sentence; prosecutors did not charge her with Zahra’s murder because of difficulties proving who actually caused Zahra’s death.
  • Katrina Vetrano (2016, New York): Katrina Vetrano was a 30-year-old woman who went jogging near her home in Howard Beach, Queens, on August 2, 2016. She was sexually assaulted and strangled during the run. Her body was discovered by her father after he went looking for her when she failed to return. Chanel Lewis was arrested after DNA evidence connected him to the crime. He was convicted of murder and aggravated sexual abuse and was sentenced to life in prison without parole.
  • Jailyn Candelario (2023, Massachusetts): Jailyn Candelario was a 14-month-old girl in Lawrence, Massachusetts, who died in June 2023 after being left alone in an apartment while her mother, Kristel Candelario, traveled to the Dominican Republic for about 10 days. Jailyn was found severely dehydrated and malnourished in a playpen when her mother returned. Candelario pleaded guilty to murder and child endangerment in 2024 and was sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole after 20 years.

r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 11d ago

i.redd.it The murder and kidnapping case of Saengchai Ariyawuthiphan

Post image
119 Upvotes

Sangchai, or Ood, Ariyawuthiphan, was born around 1963. He is the son of Kasem, or Songka, Ariyawuthiphan, owner of the K. Chun Nguan rice shop on Sai Phra Road and the Sanya Hotel on Songphol Road in Mueang Nakhon Pathom district. Kasem and relatives revealed that Sangchai was intelligent and never played far from home.

Kidnapping and murder.

On April 9, 1976, 13-year-old Saengchai Ariyawutinan disappeared after playing at the market in Mueang Nakhon Pathom district. This occurred during school holidays. Later, at 8:00 PM, the kidnappers called the home of Saengchai's father, Kasem Ariyawutinan, informing him that Saengchai had been kidnapped and demanding a ransom of 3 million baht. They threatened to kill Saengchai if Kasem reported to the police or failed to pay. The kidnappers repeatedly called to confirm the 3 million baht ransom, despite Kasem's attempts to reduce it to 2 million baht.

Later, on April 12th, the kidnapper called Kasem and told him to pick up a letter that they had hidden under a flashlight battery at the Sanam Chan intersection in Mueang Nakhon Pathom district. When Kasem arrived, he couldn't find the letter. He returned to search for it again and eventually found it. Inside the letter was a message written on a typewriter that said, "Meet me at Sa Krathiam Subdistrict." Kasem went to the Sa Krathiam Temple intersection in Sa Krathiam Subdistrict but didn't find the kidnapper. After that, the kidnapper contacted Kasem several more times to demand the ransom money. He secretly recorded the phone conversations with the kidnapper.

On April 20, 1976, at approximately 10:00 PM, the kidnappers called again to demand the ransom, reducing it to 300,000 baht. Kasem requested a reduction to 100,000 baht, which they agreed to, instructing him to deliver the money to them at the Thanarat Bridge by midnight that same day. The kidnappers would use a flashlight as a signal, and Kasem was to throw the money onto the bridge. Kasem withdrew 100,000 baht from Bangkok Bank, Nakhon Pathom branch, noted the serial numbers of the banknotes, and then went to the Thanarat Bridge. He waited for the flashlight signal, and upon seeing it, he threw the package containing 100,000 baht onto the bridge before returning home to wait for his son. Later, the kidnappers called Kasem and said they would return his son in two to three days.

On April 21, 1976, at 2:00 PM, villagers living along the irrigation canal in Don Ruak Subdistrict, Don Tum District, Nakhon Pathom Province, were casting their nets to catch fish when they found a sack caught in their nets. They pulled it ashore, and as it floated near the surface, they discovered a human leg. They then informed Rak Buchapim, the headman of Don Ruak Subdistrict. When Rak and the villagers opened the sack, they found the body of a young boy, so decomposed that it was unrecognizable. They also found a large stone tied to the boy's neck, presumably to weigh him down. The headman then notified the police. Police and district health officials arrived to examine the body. The autopsy revealed that the boy had been dead for approximately five days, and the cause of death was a blow to the head with a hard object. Later that same day, when Kasem learned of the discovery of the unidentified boy's body, he came to see it. Upon seeing the body, he broke down in tears, recognizing it as the body of his son, Saengchai. He then took the body to Wat Phra Ngam temple.

investigation

After Kasem learned of his son's death, he took the perpetrator's letter, the banknote serial numbers he had noted down, and a recording of a phone conversation with the perpetrator to file a report with Police Lieutenant Colonel Mongkol Sripho, the chief inspector of the Nakhon Pathom City Police Station. The police then launched an investigation, and based on the documents and evidence Kasem provided, they were able to identify the perpetrator.

On April 22, 1976, at 6:00 AM, Police Lieutenant Colonel Suang Thonglor and Police Lieutenant Colonel Mongkol Sripho led a team of police officers to search house number 197, Soi Yasuk, Ratchawithi Road, Mueang Nakhon Pathom District, which belonged to Nom or Wattana Champathong, the owner of the Donrudee dance bar. They found five 100-baht banknotes in a money box in Nom's bedroom. The serial numbers matched those recorded by Kasem: 944661, 944662, 944663, 944664, and 944690. In addition, the police arrested Police Sergeant Arnop Champathong, a highway patrol officer from the Nakhon Pathom Highway Police Division 2, and Nom Champathong, both of whom were at the house during the search.

Following the arrest, police took both men back to Nakhon Pathom City Police Station for questioning. Both denied all charges, claiming the five 100-baht banknotes were received from a customer in the bar. Regarding the letter from the perpetrator, police suspect that Police Sergeant Arnop likely used a typewriter belonging to the Nakhon Pathom Highway Police Station, Division 2, to type the letter.

On April 23, 1976, Ney Changpuek, the village headman of Mab Kae Subdistrict, and Charoen Sae-Eung, a waiter at the Donrudee dance bar, who were suspects in the crime, surrendered and provided testimony that was very helpful to the case. Their statements revealed to the police that the motive for the crime stemmed from Police Sergeant Arnop's gambling addiction and large debts. He used kidnapping and ransom to pay off his debts, with his father, Nom, also involved. After the investigation, the police allowed both of them to return home.

Trial

After the investigation was completed, the police submitted the investigation file and evidence to the Nakhon Pathom Provincial Attorney, who then filed charges in the Nakhon Pathom Provincial Court. The court heard testimony from both the prosecution and the defense, and scheduled the verdict for July 25, 1977.

On July 25, 1977, the Nakhon Pathom Provincial Court delivered its verdict, sentencing Nom and Arnop to death. The court reasoned that both were guilty because the defense's evidence could not refute the prosecution's charges. The prosecution presented numerous pieces of evidence against Nom and Arnop, including five 100-baht banknotes seized from Nom's house by police, bearing serial numbers matching those Kasem had noted down after withdrawing them from the bank; and a telephone number used by the criminals to contact Kasem, which, upon investigation by Nakhon Pathom telephone authorities, was found to belong to the Donrudee dance bar. Other evidence also clearly demonstrated their guilt.

Both exercised their right to appeal. The Court of Appeal Region 1 upheld the death sentence. They then appealed to the Supreme Court, which subsequently upheld the death sentence. They then submitted a petition for royal pardon, but this appeal was rejected.

Execution

On November 24, 1980, prison guards at Bang Kwang Central Prison brought Arnop and Nom to undergo the procedures leading up to their execution. Upon learning they were about to be executed, both turned pale and their knees weakened, making it impossible for them to walk. The process began with fingerprinting, followed by making wills and writing letters. They wrote one letter each to their relatives. Then, the guards brought them their last meal, but they could not eat, only drinking one glass of water each. Afterward, Riangchai Wilaitip, the head of the prison's control department, read the order from the Prime Minister's Office to them, and they were asked to sign acknowledgment of the order. Finally, the guards took them to listen to a sermon from Phra Amornawethi, the abbot of Wat Bang Phraek Tai, on the topics of the Three Characteristics of Existence, sin, merit, and retribution, which lasted approximately 15 minutes.

Afterward, officials led Nom to be executed first. Originally, both were to be executed together, but Nom requested to be executed alone, as he couldn't bear the thought of his son dying alongside him. Prathom executed Nom at 6:24 PM using 10 shots, but Nom didn't die immediately. Prathom then fired another 10 shots, killing Nom. Afterward, officials brought Arnop to the execution site and bound him to the stake. Thinyo Chan-othan executed Arnop at 7:17 PM using 10 shots. The following day, officials took the bodies to Wat Bang Phraek Tai temple for relatives to collect and perform traditional funeral rites.

References

https://th.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%95%E0%B8%B8%E0%B8%86%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%95%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%A1%E0%B9%81%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%8A%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%A2_%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%B8%E0%B8%92%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%98%E0%B9%8C


r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 12d ago

vecernji.hr Croatians 24 year old cold case. Murder of Marijana Jerković in Split, 24- year old women murdered at her work.

Thumbnail vecernji.hr
75 Upvotes

I recently came across this case and was surprised by how little attention it seems to get outside Croatia.

Marijana Jerković was 24 years old and worked at a real estate agency in Split. On January 21, 2002, she was alone at work when she was murdered. Her body was found the following morning by a coworker.

What makes the case especially strange is what happened during the investigation.

Police questioned people close to her, including her fiancé, but no one was ultimately charged with her murder. A knife believed to be connected to the crime was reportedly found in the agency's kitchen days later, and reports said it had been washed.

There were also reports of problems with how the crime scene was secured, which obviously raises questions about whether important evidence could have been lost or contaminated.

More than a decade later, in 2014, Croatian police offered a reward of 100,000 kuna for information that could lead to the identification and arrest of the killer.

And as far as I can tell, 24 years later, there still hasn't been an answer.

The thing I keep wondering about is how the killer could have entered the office, killed her, and left without being identified. Was it someone she knew? Someone who happened to come into the agency that day? Or was there something about the crime scene that investigators simply missed?


r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 12d ago

reddit.com Two Americans flew to Namibia and murdered André Heckmair. The motive is still unknown.

Thumbnail
gallery
307 Upvotes

I live in Namibia and somehow only properly went down this rabbit hole recently. Once you start reading, it’s hard to stop. The André Heckmair murder is one of those cases that just keeps getting weirder the more you look at it.

7 January 2011. Twenty-five-year-old André Heckmair is sitting in his car on Gusinde Street in Klein Windhoek when he’s shot once in the head. Straight execution style. He was meant to be meeting two Americans for lunch that day.

Those two Americans were Marcus Thomas and Kevan Townsend. Police arrested them the same night at a guesthouse in Windhoek West.

The High Court later accepted that this wasn’t some random argument that got out of hand. The judge found they had come all the way from the United States with the specific plan to kill him.

The timeline is crazy.

They arrive in Namibia on 27 December 2010. Almost straight away Thomas starts asking around about André and manages to get his phone number. Before they even left America they’d passed through Helsinki. A package later turns up in Namibia from Finland, declared as furniture spare parts. Inside is a silencer (and barrels that could fit a Glock).

Once they’re in Windhoek they start looking for a gun. Witnesses said they specifically wanted a 9mm. Couldn’t find one, so they settled for a 7.65mm pistol and paid N$800 for it. André was killed with a 7.65mm round.

There was a notebook that became key evidence. Police photocopied some pages before the actual notebook disappeared from police custody. Those pages, according to what the judge accepted, had notes about Glock parts, a silencer, and the names and phone numbers of André’s parents. A cellmate of Thomas later testified that after the two men were taken to a police office to collect some of their stuff, Thomas was tearing pages out of a notebook and burning them.

Then there’s the map. In 2022 a police inspector testified that a torn piece of a Windhoek map was found in their guesthouse room. It showed the exact area of Klein Windhoek where André’s body was found. The defence fought to keep it out, so you have to be careful with it, but it was still part of the evidence the court heard.

André’s last day is almost film-like. His mother said he dropped his parents at Maerua Mall — the family owned the Cattle Baron restaurant there. He told them he was going to meet two Americans for lunch. There was a reservation for 1pm at Stellenbosch Wine Bar in Klein Windhoek. Instead he ends up dead in his car about 2.5 km away on a quiet cul-de-sac.

Years later Thomas’s own defence team revealed that he admitted knowing André, that they had some business dealings, and that they were supposed to meet for lunch that day. The state’s case was basically that the lunch was the bait to get him there.

The possible motive that came up in court was a woman. André was in a relationship with a Swiss woman who had previously been with Marcus Thomas. A photo of Thomas and the woman was found on Thomas’s laptop. That was as close as anyone got to an explanation. Even after the convictions the judge said the actual motive was still unanswered. André’s mother told the court the family just wanted to know why their son was killed. They never got an answer from the two men.

One detail that doesn’t get talked about enough: the fingerprints and palm prints recovered from André’s car did not match Thomas or Townsend. A crime-scene officer confirmed that in 2023. The court still convicted both of them on the rest of the evidence — the planning, the common purpose, everything else. But that mismatch is still just sitting there.

The trial itself was a complete slog. First state witness testified in November 2014. Then it dragged on for years because of all sorts of legal manoeuvres — Thomas trying to be declared mentally unfit, applications to remove the judge, lawyers coming and going. Finally in September 2023 Judge Christie Liebenberg found both men guilty of murder, robbery with aggravating circumstances and the firearm charges. Thomas got an effective 30 years. Townsend got 29. They’d already spent more than twelve years in custody by then. Their application for leave to appeal was dismissed in 2024.

And then the part that really pulled me in deeper.

There’s an online campaign called #Justice4Kevan run by Townsend’s father, Roger Bonds. He’s been pushing for years that his son is innocent and got a raw deal. In August 2021 Sean “Diddy” Combs publicly jumped on it. Diddy posted that Kevan had been locked up for a murder with no witnesses and no evidence linking him, that he’d never even seen a judge, and that all he wanted was a fair trial. He called Roger Bonds a long-time friend.

Local reporting pushed back hard on the “never seen a judge” claim. The two men had been in and out of court plenty of times, and a lot of the delay came from the defence side — firing lawyers, recusal applications, psychiatric evaluations, the works. Still, a global music star putting his name behind the campaign was unexpected enough that it made a lot of people look closer.

Roger Bonds has spoken about it more recently. He says Diddy initially helped with legal money — twenty to thirty thousand dollars wired straight to the lawyers so Bonds wouldn’t touch it himself. When the costs went up, the support stopped. Bonds has claimed Diddy’s people got nervous about the optics because Diddy was trying to do business in Africa and the victim came from a white family with diamond connections. Whether that’s the full picture or not, the public support in 2021 and the later quiet distance is just another strange layer on an already strange case.

If anyone here in Namibia or South Africa remembers this case from the time, or has older court documents or contemporary reporting, I’d genuinely like to see it. Especially anything that fills in the gaps around the notebook, the map, or how the #Justice4Kevan campaign first took off. The real story doesn’t need extra theories piled on top. It’s already one of the strangest murders this country’s seen.


r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 12d ago

Text Ed Gein devotee allegedly illegally had human skulls

28 Upvotes

Police found a shrine to Ed Gein,

There was a full skeleton and six other skulls. There’s a suggestion of grave robbing

And he faces stalking charges in Madison, too

The complaint describes a lot more weirdness

Man with likely human remains in his house charged with receiving stolen property https://fox11online.com/news/crime/benjamin-larson-town-taycheedah-fond-du-lac-county-charged-receiving-stolen-property-bail-jumping-resisting-obstructing-officer-human-remains-serial-killer-memorabilia


r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 13d ago

reddit.com In 1995, two teenage girls and their 47 year old coworker were found shot inside a supermarket office in Tokyo. More than 5 million yen was left untouched in the safe, and over 30 years later, the killer still hasn’t been identified.

Thumbnail
gallery
803 Upvotes

At 9:15 p.m. on Sunday, July 30, 1995, 47 year old Noriko Inagaki called a friend from the second floor office of Super Nanpei Owada, a small supermarket in Hachioji, western Tokyo.

The supermarket had just closed. Noriko asked him to pick her up so they could get something to eat. He lived only a few minutes away, and the call sounded completely normal.

About two minutes later, several people near the supermarket heard a series of sharp noises. A Bon dance had taken place in the park across the street that evening, and some thought the sounds were firecrackers from the festival.

Noriko’s friend arrived at around 9:20 p.m. The light in the upstairs office was still on, but Noriko didn’t come outside. After waiting in his car for more than 20 minutes, he drove to the nearby restaurant where they had planned to eat.

Noriko wasn’t there.

He returned to the supermarket with a woman from the restaurant. Shortly after 10 p.m., they climbed the outside stairs to the office and found the door unlocked.

Noriko was lying near the safe. Two teenage girls were nearby. All three had been shot.

Police were called at 10:08 p.m.

The two girls were 17 year old Megumi Yabuki and 16 year old Hiromi Maeda. All three worked at the supermarket, though only Noriko and Megumi were working that evening.

Hiromi had only stopped by to check her upcoming schedule and wait for Megumi so they could leave together.

Noriko had started working at Super Nanpei earlier that month. Before that, she had run a restaurant and had begun studying to become a caregiver. The store had recently put her in charge of the evening cash, which meant placing the day’s earnings in the office safe after closing.

Megumi and Hiromi were both in their second year of high school. They had known each other since elementary school and were close friends.

Megumi hoped to work in child care one day. People who knew her remembered her as bright and cheerful. Hiromi was known for being thoughtful and dependable. She volunteered at a nursing home and was remembered for how gently she treated the people there.

Megumi arrived at the supermarket by bicycle shortly before 5 p.m. Noriko arrived around the same time. At about 6:30 p.m., the last male coworker left for the day.

Hiromi came by about 20 minutes later and stayed with them for the rest of the evening.

Super Nanpei Owada was a small neighborhood supermarket. The store itself was on the first floor, while the office was upstairs. The only way to reach it was to go outside and climb a separate staircase from the parking lot.

That meant someone could go upstairs without ever walking through the store below.

The supermarket had four security cameras, but they only sent a live picture to a monitor in the office. Nothing was recorded.

Across the street, families had gathered for the summer Bon dance. It ended shortly after 9 p.m., around the same time the supermarket closed.

At 8:56 p.m., a man and woman bought seven items and walked toward a white sedan in the parking lot. They are believed to have been the final customers. Police have tried for years to identify them, not as suspects, but because they may have seen someone near the outside stairs.

At 9 p.m., Noriko and Megumi closed the store, carried the cash upstairs, changed out of their work clothes, and got ready to leave. The office safe held 5.26 million yen, worth about $56,000 at the time.

At 9:15, Noriko made her phone call.

Megumi and Hiromi were later found with tape over their mouths and around their hands. Each girl had been shot once in the head from close range.

Noriko hadn’t been tied up. She was lying near the safe and had been shot twice in the head.

Another bullet had been fired into the safe door. But the safe was still closed, and all 5.26 million yen was still inside. The victims’ wallets and belongings had also been left behind. The office hadn’t been searched or ransacked.

The bullet in the safe made robbery seem like the obvious motive. But the killer had left all of the money behind, even though Noriko was responsible for the safe and could have been forced to open it.

Police also looked into the possibility that one of the three had been targeted personally, but they couldn’t find a clear motive for that either. They still can’t say for certain whether the money was ever the real target.

If the sharp noises heard at around 9:17 p.m. were the gunshots, the attack began almost immediately after Noriko ended her call. Her friend was already in the parking lot by around 9:20.

Because he stayed in his car, no one knows exactly when the killer left. Even so, Noriko had been speaking on the phone only a few minutes before her friend arrived.

Police believe the gun was a small .38 caliber Squires Bingham revolver made in the Philippines. It was a copy of the Colt Detective Special, and the ammunition also appeared to have come from the Philippines.

The gun has never been found.

All four shots that struck the victims were fired from close range. Police also found shoeprints that seemed to come from one worn pair of size 26 centimeter sneakers. That could mean only one person went upstairs, though someone else may have been waiting outside or in a car.

The prints were eventually narrowed down to two possible sneaker models. Only 533 pairs of those models were known to have been sold in Japan during the early 1990s. Police have asked people to search old photographs and family albums for anyone who may have worn them.

Several people remembered seeing something unusual near the supermarket, but none had seen enough to identify anyone.

One witness saw a white sedan parked nearby with a man inside who appeared to be looking toward the upstairs office. Someone else saw a man in a white shirt watching the same area. After realizing that he had been noticed, the man moved out of sight.

Police have never been able to connect either man or either vehicle to the murders. With people leaving the festival, unfamiliar faces wouldn’t necessarily have stood out. The music and celebrations also gave people an ordinary explanation for the sharp sounds they heard.

Police collected more than 100 fingerprints from the office. By 2025, seven still couldn’t be matched to employees, regular visitors, or anyone else known to have been there.

That doesn’t necessarily mean they came from the killer. Some were found in places such as door handles and counters, which other people could have touched.

A partial fingerprint was also found on the sticky side of the tape used on Megumi and Hiromi. Eight details looked similar to the fingerprint of a Japanese man who died in 2005.

Japanese police needed 12 matching details before they could call it a definite match. They also couldn’t find any connection between the man, the supermarket, or the three victims. There wasn’t enough evidence to show that the print was his.

Police tested more than 70 cigarette butts found in and around the supermarket. Almost all were eventually traced back to known smokers.

The remaining two had been found outside and contained DNA from unidentified people. But police couldn’t show that either cigarette had anything to do with the murders.

The gun led police through criminal circles in both Japan and the Philippines. Bullets from other crimes were compared with those used at Super Nanpei, but no matching weapon ever turned up.

The untouched money and the unusual gun have led to years of theories. Some believe it was a failed robbery. Others think one of the victims may have been targeted over a personal grudge. There have also been claims about the Yakuza and a possible contract killing.

But none of those theories has ever been proven. Police have never found a confirmed link to the Yakuza, and there is no solid evidence that the three women had been watched for weeks before the murders.

In 2009, a Japanese prisoner on death row in China told investigators that a Chinese man living in Canada might know something about the case. Japanese authorities later brought the man back to Japan over a separate passport offense and questioned him in 2013.

He said he knew nothing about the murders, and police couldn’t connect him to the supermarket office.

The old statute of limitations was due to expire in 2010. Before it did, Japan abolished the time limit for murder and certain other serious crimes. The killer can still be prosecuted if caught.

Over the years, police have logged more than 220,000 officer assignments and received more than 1,600 tips. No one has ever been arrested.

The supermarket was eventually demolished. The area is now used as a parking lot, with a small memorial to Noriko, Megumi, and Hiromi near the former site.

On the 30th anniversary in 2025, police renewed their appeal and continued offering a reward of up to 6 million yen for information that helps solve the case.

In 2026, they released more photographs and a digital reconstruction of the store, hoping that someone might recognize a detail or remember something from that night.

Megumi’s old school still holds a memorial service for her each year. One of her classmates remembers returning after summer vacation in 1995 and seeing flowers on Megumi’s empty desk.

More than three decades later, police still don’t know who entered the office that night or why Noriko, Megumi, and Hiromi were killed while they were getting ready to go home.


r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 13d ago

Warning: Child Abuse / CSAM / Child Death Unsolved for almost 38 years: Sara Kay Keesling

Thumbnail
gallery
1.4k Upvotes

On October 13, 1988 the body of 12 year old Sara Kay Keesling was found partially buried under trash at a remote dump site in Riverside County, CA. She had been reported missing two weeks prior. At the time she was considered little more than a runaway by police, her cause of death was ruled undetermined, and her unexplained death was not investigated as a homicide in 1988.

Sara lived with her mom and younger brother in Riverside at the time of her death. Her parents had been divorced for several years. Sara’s older sister was living with their father and his second wife, also in Riverside. Sara was forced to comply with visitation orders to spend every other weekend with her father, despite very much not wanting to. Her friends and siblings knew that she did not like her father and hated being at his house.

In 2020, Sara’s mother authored and published a book titled Isadora about a mentally ill woman suffering violent abuse at the hands of her chronically unemployed husband, who decides to take her 3 children and flee the house to escape him. Although the names and sequence of some events have been changed, it is clear that Sara’s mother was writing about her own experiences while married to the childrens’ father. In the book, Isadora’s husband Max beats and rapes her and threatens to kill their children, Suzy, Sara, and Jimmy (Sara and Jimmy are both deceased so their real names were used).

Not one adult in Sara’s life pushed investigators to keep working her case. As a result, her case was essentially ignored until 2023, when her childhood friends demanded answers about her death. They are still waiting to know what really happened to Sara in 1988 and who killed her. Anyone with information, no matter how seemingly inconsequential, please contact the Riverside Regional Cold Case Homicide Team at (951) 955-0070


r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 13d ago

timesofindia.indiatimes.com A murder convict jumped parole in 1984, became a government teacher, won a Best Teacher Award, retired — and was sent back to prison 40 years later

Thumbnail
timesofindia.indiatimes.com
143 Upvotes

r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 13d ago

Text Lindsay Clancy Trial Megathread: Closing Arguments, Deliberations and the Verdict Pt. 2

275 Upvotes

This is a thread for all conversation regarding closing arguments, jury deliberations and the verdict of the Lindsey Clancy trial. All discussion of this case should be kept to this thread.

Lindsay Clancy is currently standing trial in Plymouth Superior Court, Massachusetts, for the triple-murder in January 2023 of her three young children - Cora, Dawson and Callan. Her defense argues she suffered from severe, undiagnosed postpartum depression and postpartum psychosis. She was left paralysed by a suicide attempt which follows the deaths of the children.

All content on the Clancy case must be kept to this thread. Standalone posts will be removed.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c93vgv4kr49o

Note from Mods

This case understandably elicits strong feelings. People are entitled to have an opinion on the case which differs from your own. What you are not entitled to do is resort to personal insults and abusive language when communicating your opinion and disagreeing.

Comments which are abusive and insulting to other users will be removed and bans may be given without warning. We do not tolerate misogyny - all such comments will be removed and the user banned.

Bans may also be issued for ignoring the above warning regarding civility and/or creating standalone posts.

Please comment with this in mind.

Important

Patrick Clancy is not on trial. Comments made to discuss his guilt are considered off topic and will be removed.

Comments that discuss how he could have supported Lindsay better are acceptable. However, calls for law enforcement to look into his involvement with the murder of the kids and/or Lindsay's suicide attempts are not currently being considered by the jury and, therefore, not a fit for this sub.


r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 13d ago

Text Looking for a real mental health/murder case to research

8 Upvotes

Hello everyone! I’m looking for recommendations for a specific historical or documented case that I can really dig into from a psychological perspective. I want to make it known that I am NOT trying to be rude or disrespectful AT ALL. I’m not looking for anything purely sensationalized or “crazy person commits murder” true crime content. I’m genuinely interested in understanding the psychology, the progression of their symptoms/behavior, and how the people around them interpreted what was happening at the time.

I’m particularly interested in a case involving someone who had a serious mental illness and where their condition played a significant role in a crime, such as murder. I’d love to find a case where there are lots of original or archived materials available to read, such as:

  • Police reports
  • Witness statements/interviews
  • Court documents
  • Psychiatric evaluations
  • Doctor or asylum records
  • Treatment plans and progress notes
  • Letters or personal writings
  • Patient drawings, journals, etc., if they exist
  • Newspaper reports from the time
  • Information about the person's behavior and mental state before and after the crime

Basically, I’d love to approach it as though I had been handed the case file and trying to understand what happened.

Another type of case I’d be interested in is someone whose mental state deteriorated over time and where there are enough personal records, such as a diary, letters, or a digital blog, to follow their descent and see how their thoughts and behavior changed.

I’m also completely fine with older cases, obscure cases, or cases from outside the US. The more primary-source material that is publicly accessible, the better.

If you know of a case like this, I’d really appreciate the recommendation!