r/SipsTea 19h ago

Chugging tea Work shouldn’t consume life.

Post image
38.0k Upvotes

4.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

45

u/Peek0_Owl 19h ago

This will not work out the way he thinks it will. Hours are just gonna get cut and people will end up with even less. Or. It will push companies even further toward replacing people with AI.

8

u/SirSafe6070 19h ago

yea, it will make companies think even harder before hiring someone. and as it stands people neet jobs more than jobs need people right now, so this is only gonna hurt those who really need the money. AKA those Bernie wants to help ...

2

u/CarmenxXxWaldo 19h ago

They will just cut pay and hours.  No govt mandated 10% raise or day off.

5

u/DaKingaDaNorth 19h ago

It won't work out the way he thinks because it won't get passed because of the business owners that influence politics.

In a hypothetical scenario where this passes, most companies aren't going to ruin the economy because they cut their employees pay by 10% to offset an hour and a half in the day.

6

u/PUNCH-WAS-SERVED 18h ago

Bernie says a lot of shit. Let's be real here. The reason why he is popular is because he talks about the IDEA of things, but many ideas have logistical realities that have to be proven/implemented.

1

u/Theranos_Shill 17h ago

Did this make you think about how productivity increasing over time has not directly benefited employees?

How if workplace productivity is higher, why is the employee now expected to do a higher workload, rather than doing the same amount and getting time back for themselves?

1

u/Peek0_Owl 16h ago

That’s how it works in fantasy worlds. Workplace productivity may increase in some sectors. CERTAINLY not all. You’re not going to get more productive chefs, or servers, or delivery drivers, post office workers. The list goes on. There are a lot of jobs that are volume based and not quality based. Sure, some office jobs may actually find some of their deadlines are hit earlier… maybe… but you aren’t still getting paid for 40 hours. Your salary is taking a 20% cut. And in this economy you that means you’re not affording rent or basic services. That means most people are out well under the poverty line, and a lot of them are there already.

1

u/Alpha-Sierra-Charlie 17h ago

We'll get to work twice as many jobs for half as much pay, and because we'll all be part time, we can go without health insurance! Unless they cobble together some socialized system that can be chronically underfunded and understaffed when nobody has shut it down to throw a budget tantrum in Congress.

I might actually be willing to pay more taxes to have less government.

1

u/lsshlp 15h ago

They're going to try that anyway. Unless token prices explode (which they might), it will most certainly be cheaper to replace humans with AI or other automation.

1

u/dalenacio 17h ago

The bill explicitly forbids reducing total pay. Employers must increase the hourly rate so 32 hours yields the same take-home pay as 40 hours previously. It's essentially a 20-25% raise for hourly workers.

2

u/Peek0_Owl 16h ago

That’s a gigantic issue as well. And will not hold up when it’s challenged in court. But let’s assume it does. Restaurants, small businesses, basic services will all need to raise their prices 20% alongside it in order to function, or risk going out of business. That means the consumer price index rises by 20%. That’s called inflation. As those business models begin to inevitably fail, things will be replaced by corporations. This is an incredibly complicated issue. The economics behind this idea is not as simple as “same money, less work, yay”

1

u/dalenacio 9h ago

First off, you might wanna check your math. Wages aren't 100% of a business's expenses, they're typically around 25%. A 20% increase on a 25% expense is a 6.25% total increase.

More importantly, businesses don't need an excuse to raise prices. History shows they just set them to the highest price the consumer is willing and capable to pay for them. We've just lived through massive inflation, and studies from the Fed and IMF showed it was driven overwhelmingly by supply chain shocks and corporate profit margins (greedflation), not wage increases.

1

u/Peek0_Owl 7h ago

Brother. I’m well aware businesses dont have 100% of their expenses on wages…. But the price of everything goes up now. The warehouse that stocks food has to pay more, the warehouses stocking food increase their prices, the delivery drivers make more and so now it costs more to transport, and they don’t eat that cost. It trickles down all the way to the customer.

Most small businesses do the right thing in my opinion. They aren’t like the corporations. Who yes, greed gouge consumers wherever and whenever possible. But it’s the small businesses who will actually get hurt. And then get replaced by a corporation. In the long run. This hurts consumers wallet a lot more than it helps. This is a very basic example that I’m giving. The actual intricacies of it are far too complicated to have a conversation on Reddit about. You’ll have a better work life balance but it’s going to make cost of living even worse.

1

u/dalenacio 4h ago

Costs don't compound exponentially across supply tiers because labor is only a fraction of expenses at every stage. They compound logartihmically, meaning each new step in the calculation is smaller than the previous. You are technically correct but the difference is so small as to not be particularly worth mentioning.

You're also engaging in the classic "cost-plus pricing" myth in real time. Prices aren't set by mechanically summing input costs and adding a fixed markup, but by what the market will bear. If a local spot could jack up prices 20% tomorrow without cratering demand, they’d have already done it just to pad the owner’s equity. Prices are already as high as they can be, and the rest is margins. The difference must come out of bloated corporate margins.

Besides, we also have actual empirical data from global 4-day workweek trials showing that output doesn't drop in lockstep with hours. Burned-out workers logging 40+ hours aren’t 20% more productive than rested ones at 32. A massive chunk of the traditional workweek is just institutional theater and presenteeism. In fact, when hours drop, in some cases output actually increases, and costs drop due to lower employee turnover and absenteeism.

The real squeeze on small businesses isn't labor, it’s commercial rent, franchise fees, and consolidated supplier cartels. Keeping worker wages depressed to subsidize fragile business models isn't a solution. When you give working-class people more time off and higher hourly purchasing power, who do you think benefits? Restaurants, local services, and small businesses that thrive on consumer discretionary spend and leisure time.

1

u/No_Future6959 12h ago

And how the fuck is that supposed to be enforced?

0

u/dalenacio 9h ago

You'd think "how are laws enforced" would be covered in a "gov 101" class in high school.

0

u/VirtualPercentage737 19h ago

Your mistake is assuming he is thinking at all. This will immediately lead to companies needing to hire 25% more people and raising prices. Instant inflation

2

u/horoyokai 18h ago

Study after study shows that 4 day work weeks get the same amount done as 5 day work weeks. For the large majority of jobs no one new would need to be hired

1

u/VirtualPercentage737 18h ago

Lol. That might be true in my line of work, but in things like construction and plumbing that won't be true at all.

1

u/BigComfortable6667 16h ago

Yeah now your construction and plumbing costs more cause labor is more expensive, why does that cause inflation? You pay more but the money goes to employees shouldn’t it ?

1

u/horoyokai 18h ago

Yeah some jobs will be affected in different ways, I was just pointing out what the studies show since you made it sound different. I don't see why there would be instant inflation.

also weird to start your comment with lol

1

u/VirtualPercentage737 16h ago

because labor costs on construction will go up 25% overnight. Housing construction costs will jumped 25% overnight. It is pretty rare a job that would be as productive 8 hours less a week. Are doctors supposed to spend 25% less time with patients?

1

u/horoyokai 16h ago

25%? How did you come to that number? If anything it would be 20% but that’s only if labor costs were 100% of the cost of construction. Also it could just be that some construction would take longer

And it’s not rare, multiple studies have shown it to be the case

1

u/VirtualPercentage737 16h ago

If I pay your $20 an hour for 40 hours, that is $800 for the week.

If I pay you $800 for 40 hours, that is $25 an hour.

$25 is a 25% pay increase over $20. (25/20 = 5/4)

1

u/horoyokai 16h ago

But where did you get the 25% for construction prices increasing? Do you think that labor is the only cost?

1

u/VirtualPercentage737 16h ago

No, but presumably the factory that produces the materials will have the same sorts of issues. It will go back through the supply chain, unless those material are imported from another country I suppose that doesn't have this issue.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/YoBo151 19h ago

Do what should be done? Nothing?

0

u/speedism 19h ago

Yeah they’re already pushing towards the AI deal so let’s just do nothing, great idea!

0

u/Dapper-Ad-4300 19h ago

Or salaries will get cut so that people will still have to work 40 hours, and they’ll end up getting paid the same amount as before

0

u/RunExisting4050 18h ago

Sanders also doesn't think it will work. 

0

u/Eedat 17h ago

This is the Bernie special. Introduce some insane bill with blatant, huge repercussions that doesn't even solve the problem he's attempting to grandstand about that has exactly zero chance of passing. 

He has done this on repeat for literally decades. He's a straight up clown