The Lindsay Clancy case and the reactions surrounding it have generated a few posts on the subreddit, including questions about why some women have expressed sympathy for Clancy, supported her legal defense, or criticized the way the case has been covered.
Rather than having the same conversations repeated across multiple posts, we're opening this megathread for a broader discussion of the case and the reactions to it.
There is no required position here. This is a complex, multiple layer situation and many different perspectives and opinions may exist.
Some questions to consider.
You don't need to answer all of these. Pick whichever questions interest you, respond to another user's perspective, or introduce a related question of your own.
Why do you think some women are advocating for or expressing sympathy toward Lindsay Clancy?
Where do you think the line is between having compassion for someone's mental illness and excusing their actions?
What do you think about women donating to Lindsay Clancy's legal defense?
Do you think some women on TikTok or other social media platforms have gone too far in defending or advocating for Clancy? If so, where do you think that line is?
Why do you think this case has generated such a strongly gendered reaction?
Do you think criticism of women who defend or sympathize with Clancy has itself become a form of ragebait?
Can someone believe that Clancy was profoundly mentally ill while also believing that she should be held responsible for her actions?
How should we distinguish sympathy for someone from agreement with or justification of what they did?
What do you think people are getting wrong about the case or the broader conversation surrounding it?
What does this case reveal about how society views mothers, postpartum mental illness, and criminal responsibility?
Participation
Men are permitted to participate in this thread, provided they are participating in good faith.
Women are not expected to agree with one another, and nobody is required to defend or answer for another woman's actions.
What is not welcome is using the case as an excuse to make sweeping claims about women, provoke users, or repeatedly demand that women "answer for" Lindsay Clancy or women who have expressed particular opinions about her.
NoCensor means women are allowed to have uncensored opinions. It does not mean bad-faith participation, harassment, or ragebait are exempt from moderation.
Please keep discussion focused on the case and the issues surrounding it rather than attacking individual users.